It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
U.S. mega bomb MOP weighs 14 tons and has cost over 100 million pieces to produce. But it still seen as wimpy against Iran's nuclear facilities.
Now requested extra money to make the bomb even more powerful.
An important goal for the U.S. right now is that, if necessary, to reach Iran's nuclear bunkers, in which the West fears that efforts are under way to develop nuclear weapons.
STOCKHOLM. U.S. mega bomb MOP weighs 14 tons and has cost over 100 million pieces to produce. But it still seen as wimpy against Iran's nuclear facilities.
Now requested extra money to make the bomb even more powerful.
An important goal for the U.S. right now is that, if necessary, to reach Iran's nuclear bunkers, in which the West fears that efforts are under way to develop nuclear weapons.
While Iran's facilities have strengthened America's weapons are not really kept up with, fear the military. The focus on bombs that can drill deep into the soil will therefore increase by $ 82 million, according to a request by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) explains.
Primarily it is about the giant MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator - something like "Colossal Penetration play"). Its construction began last year and delivered by Boeing under a contract for 20 copies. The project has cost $ 330 million, equivalent to over 100 million pieces.
Israel
As late as 2009 said that U.S. Air Force to settle for a dozen of the giant bombs, to be able to drill down up to about 60 feet into the ground before it explodes.
The rumors about a military attack on Iran, it has also been mentioned that the U.S. would allow Israel to do the heavy lifting. According to the WSJ thinks, however, the U.S. does not export the bomb."
So US is getting ready to bomb Iran? Why else would they be alarmed about their bombs being to "wimpy"?
I don't like any of this since they probably already have bigger bombs and just want money to other stuff.
Some statements in the threads I put in are also saying "It's not just aimed at Iran. Frankly, it's aimed at any enemy that decides to locate in some kind of impenetrable location.". So guys? Is it nearing WW3? Since now they are talking about bombing Iran in the news.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
So the MOP is 30 000 lbs.
The B-2 can carry at most 50 000 lbs.
So they can make it at least 50% bigger. Will that be enough?
Or just to hell with it, use tactical nukes already.edit on 28-1-2012 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Britguy
Originally posted by Vitchilo
So the MOP is 30 000 lbs.
The B-2 can carry at most 50 000 lbs.
So they can make it at least 50% bigger. Will that be enough?
Or just to hell with it, use tactical nukes already.edit on 28-1-2012 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)
Good point! I also believe this is the biggest bomb any of their current aircraft can carry. So, they'd either have to develop another aircraft capable of carrying a newer heavier bomb, or use a nuclear warhead on the existing bomb to get the job done!
The Defense Department has spent about $330 million so far to develop about 20 of the bombs, which are built by Boeing Co., the report pointed out.
The Pentagon is seeking about $82 million more to make the bomb more effective, The Journal said.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Well I remember seeing a pentagon document back in 2006...
It was a presentation done to the Pentagon about hitting Iran's nuclear facilities with bunker buster nukes. And it said it was all safe for civilians because the nuke went off underground...
Apparently the Pentagon called BS on that and developed the MOP. Now it seems it won't do the job... so hopefully it's not back to ``Plan A with nukes``.
Since there is going to be a high potential for nuclear fallout even if conventional weapons could do the job [which apparently they can't :shk: ] then using a nuclear bunker buster to do the same job better is a no brainer!
Personal Disclosure: It's propaganda because they want more money for what can already be done!
Originally posted by FejkNick
So US is getting ready to bomb Iran? Why else would they be alarmed about their bombs being to "wimpy"?
I don't like any of this since they probably already have bigger bombs and just want money to other stuff.
Some statements in the threads I put in are also saying "It's not just aimed at Iran. Frankly, it's aimed at any enemy that decides to locate in some kind of impenetrable location.". So guys? Is it nearing WW3? Since now they are talking about bombing Iran in the news.
www.aftonbladet.se
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 28-1-2012 by FejkNick because: (no reason given)edit on 28-1-2012 by FejkNick because: (no reason given)
...according to U.S. officials briefed on the plan
Some experts question....
A senior defence official said...
Another senior U.S. official said...
According to Air Force officials....
In very limited circumstances, anonymity is valuable and justified (e.g., when someone is risking something substantial to expose concealed wrongdoing of serious public interest).
But promiscuous, unjustified anonymity -- which pervades the establishment press -- is the linchpin of most bad, credibility-destroying reporting. It enables government officials and others to lie to the public with impunity or manipulate them with propaganda, using eager reporters as both their megaphone and shield. It is the weapon of choice for reporters eager to serve as loyal message-carriers and royal court gossip columnists. It preserves and bolsters the culture of secrecy that dominates Washington -- exactly the opposite of what a real journalist, by definition, would seek to accomplish.
“They (anonymous officials) said the new money was meant to ensure the weapon would be more effective against the deepest bunkers, including Iran's Fordow enrichment plant facility...”
The official said some Pentagon war planners believe conventional bombs won't be effective against Fordow and that a tactical nuclear weapon may be the only military option if the goal is to destroy the facility. "Once things go into the mountain, then really you have to have something that takes the mountain off," the official said.