It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TetsuoIronMan
reply to post by staticarium
Nick Griffin, is that you? Seriously, I am sick of all the nationalists in this country, why do you feel we need an "identity" at all, we are all human right? And where on earth do you get the idea that any jobs were "stolen" this would imply that some Indians came to your workplace and told you to take a hike, and I see no evidence to implicate this. Furthermore, the UK has been considered the worlds safe haven for 100s of years and we are a huge melting pot of different races so to single out one in particular is just pathetic.
Back on topic though, I think it is a disgusting practice removing any organ from a child without the parents consent.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
My outrage on this topic and subject isn't from the practice of Body parts being harvested and kept for science or training. It's ignorant to think it doesn't happen and naive to think a world can exist with doctors and medicine where learning isn't advanced this way.
I'd noted that there are plenty of unclaimed bodies in any major city. Prisoners are another class where unclaimed bodies are not unheard of. If shortages still exist, fine.. throw prisoners some commissary funds or something for signed consent when the time comes. There are ways to get what is needed.. but not like this.
This isn't just immoral...it's just a violation at the deepest level imaginable. This is suggesting an acceptance that nothing..but absolutely NOTHING is ours. Not even our own bodies or the parts therein. If we're ready to give even that last thing...that last ownership of self for, as some have said 'the good of society'..then what is left?
Really...have we sunk that low?edit on 17-1-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TetsuoIronMan
reply to post by staticarium
Wow, still stuck in the left/right paradigm I see.
I don't see where this quote came from "You don't support the destruction of the English identity and nationality so you must be a fascist!" I never stated this. In fact I am neither for or against the destruction of the English identity, I just believe humanity is a whole being that does not require 100s of separate "identities" based on land borders which are really human farms anyway. Cheering on your own enslavement is for the deluded. I end this here so as not to derail this thread.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by Unity_99
I know what you are saying and honestly i am split on this issue. Mostly i am in your camp but i do see the counter argument. And, as a poster above me has pointed out, the organs were taken before there was a ban put in place on this sort of thing - so it isn't a new story per say, just new that the story has come out.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by Unity_99
I know what you are saying and honestly i am split on this issue. Mostly i am in your camp but i do see the counter argument. And, as a poster above me has pointed out, the organs were taken before there was a ban put in place on this sort of thing - so it isn't a new story per say, just new that the story has come out.
There is no counter argument. People do not stand under others, and you cannot take their body parts legally in any way, without consent. Its a CRIME. Its a well established crime, its one that fits into basic common law, ie. do not harm laws. Their corporate law IS NOT EVEN LEGAL. Its crimes against humanity. Only basic common law is legal, the other is slavery.
They cannot just take and use people's body parts, any more than your neighbor can, because it benefits them, they have to do it legally.
There is no other side to this.
Unless there was consent given by the parents they cannot access those brains. They are going to be charged and see the insides of a court house.edit on 17-1-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
I'd wondered if someone would make a point of the fact the story happened to be based in the UK, but I didn't expect it would come up this way.
Originally posted by staticarium
At the end of the day, the ludicrousness of an American lecturing us English on "human rights" and "morality" is absolutely blinding.
Originally posted by TetsuoIronMan
reply to post by staticarium
I said that because I actually thought your original post was something Nick Griffin might say. It's exactly the type of knee-jerk response you would expect from a member or voter of the BNP, and implies that you are a nationalist. You are the one going around shouting fascist so perhaps that reveals something more about yourself than you originally let on? But frankly I don't care I just felt that your initial comment was irrelevant to this topic.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I'd wondered if someone would make a point of the fact the story happened to be based in the UK, but I didn't expect it would come up this way.
Originally posted by staticarium
At the end of the day, the ludicrousness of an American lecturing us English on "human rights" and "morality" is absolutely blinding.
Yeah, it happened in the UK, and to those who ask about the law and when it did or didn't go into effect vs. what happened, I'd refer back to my OP where I'd asked where a law needed to be passed to know how wrong this is?
Now back to the main issue though, It happened under the National Health System, I presume, but it's the attitude and the reckless approach to such a private matter of self and property, if one can't see it in any warmer terms than that. It's still valid though.......yet could have happened in Canada under that system or the United States as we're running headlong to join the same cattle care single payer type system where people are simply broken meat machines to fix or dispose of.
It's that latter cold attitude that is so bad...the nation it happened in is secondary and could have been a number of places in this day and age. Things have fallen so far, so fast.
Originally posted by staticarium
So you attempted to use the Left/Right paradigm as a weapon, which clearly failed, so you attempt to lecture me on the Left/Right paradigm which also failed, and now you go back to using the Left/Right paradigm again as a weapon. You are a fool of the highest order, not worthy of any more of my time on this matter.
Originally posted by TetsuoIronMan
Originally posted by staticarium
So you attempted to use the Left/Right paradigm as a weapon, which clearly failed, so you attempt to lecture me on the Left/Right paradigm which also failed, and now you go back to using the Left/Right paradigm again as a weapon. You are a fool of the highest order, not worthy of any more of my time on this matter.
Not at all. I have no need for weapons of any sort, I have no reason to lecture anybody for that matter either. I was merely poking at you to figure out why on earth you feel the need for a national identity at all, and you have failed to provide me with any good reason.
Tetsuo out.