It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Starchild23
I think if Ron Paul is elected President, I will personally train beneath the watchful eye of the Al Qaeda so I may have the exquisite honor of personally "terminating" his Presidency myself.
Originally posted by Talltexxxan
As we all know, the PTB hate Dr.Paul and everything he stands for
Originally posted by Starchild23
I think if Ron Paul is elected President, I will personally train beneath the watchful eye of the Al Qaeda so I may have the exquisite honor of personally "terminating" his Presidency myself.
No politician deserves to be worshipped like a freakin' priest. It's a dirty game, and to get as far as he's gotten, ya gotta play dirty or you go home broke.
Originally posted by Starchild23
I think if Ron Paul is elected President, I will personally train beneath the watchful eye of the Al Qaeda so I may have the exquisite honor of personally "terminating" his Presidency myself.
No politician deserves to be worshipped like a freakin' priest. It's a dirty game, and to get as far as he's gotten, ya gotta play dirty or you go home broke.
Originally posted by Starchild23
I think if Ron Paul is elected President, I will personally train beneath the watchful eye of the Al Qaeda so I may have the exquisite honor of personally "terminating" his Presidency myself.
No politician deserves to be worshipped like a freakin' priest. It's a dirty game, and to get as far as he's gotten, ya gotta play dirty or you go home broke.
What better way to destroy Rons presidency than have him dealing with a massive world war that he has no choice but to have the US involved in.
Originally posted by inivux
reply to post by Talltexxxan
I think, assuming such shadow governments do exist (in the context you imply; that is, the context that isn't merely giant, public, "evil" corporations), and regardless of the fact I am a laymen in global political dynamics, your idea is highly possible.
I rationalize it as follows:
Assuming there was some government "negligence" involved in 9/11, and combined with the fact "the PTB" are engaged in an overt, blatant information war against Dr. Paul, it stands to reason that nothing would hurt his stated position of non-intervention more, than for the same PTB to instigate a conflict with Iran, and then claim the opening move was made by Iran (when it was actually cased by the PTB, and them blamed on Iran).
The ironic part is, his position of non-intervention is being successfully, intentionally misconstrued into a position of pacifism or isolationism. Thus, when "Iran" does attack, and we become involved in a war, Ron Paul's growing plebeian resistance will scream at the top of their lungs "I TOLD YOU SO!", which is more division, and exactly what TPB want.
Besides, the fact of the matter is, the POTUS is really nothing more than a figurehead. A talking head. A voice and a face for the masses to associate themselves with. The real power lies in the hands of "the PTB" or the "shadow government". Most of us would agree with that.
Further, the position itself is independent from the men that fill it. Once a man does fill it however, that man soon realizes how little control he actually has, despite their good intentions (if any). That is why they "all end up the same". They are forced to play by the rules.
So, all of this bi-partisan talk and hatred spewed forth from both sides is a diversion from the real issue. That is one of ATS' main problems, as "outside the norm" as we claim to be. It is another example of the division TPB create.
"Keep the sheeple at each other's throats, and at the throat of the candidate opposite to the individuals' personal political association."