It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In America and other like countries we tend to think things through to the point of finding these differences to be able to say things like "I support the Jews, but not Israel" But go to another mid eastern country and see if anyone there holds a difference between Jews and Israel. I bet they do not.
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
As far as muslims go the only Jew they will tolerate is one living in subservience to them, paying the jizzya - at least up until the arrival of the Mahdi when they can all be slaughtered.
Most of the Koran deals with hatred of infidels, especially jews - this is not about 'anti-zionism' - it is about unsubservient jews living in land formerly conquered by Islam - and therfore considered to be Islamic land foreverafter.
All this nitpicking about distinctions is merely to obscure from western cretins the real basis of their hatred.
Originally posted by Jermicide
Like I mentioned on another thread today dealing with some of the same things.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Just because WE can realize a difference between Anti-Zionism as a political movement and Anti-Semitism does not mean that those that ARE anti one or the other sees a difference.
In America and other like countries we tend to think things through to the point of finding these differences to be able to say things like "I support the Jews, but not Israel" But go to another mid eastern country and see if anyone there holds a difference between Jews and Israel. I bet they do not.
Ask the same what the difference in being Jewish and being a Zionist is, and again I bet that they don't see a difference. Even if some of the rest of us do.
Anti Zionism is not Racist
Originally posted by jcord
The Mahdi is an idea that is only accepted by the minority Shia and not even all of them. Yet you make no distinction and just lump them all together.
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
As far as muslims go the only Jew they will tolerate is one living in subservience to them, paying the jizzya - at least up until the arrival of the Mahdi when they can all be slaughtered.
Most of the Koran deals with hatred of infidels, especially jews - this is not about 'anti-zionism' - it is about unsubservient jews living in land formerly conquered by Islam - and therfore considered to be Islamic land foreverafter.
All this nitpicking about distinctions is merely to obscure from western cretins the real basis of their hatred.
"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews)
en.wikipedia.org...
"It is not anti-Semitic to criticize the policies of the state of Israel."
- Colin Powell, former US Secretary of State
Originally posted by jcord
I know antizionist Jews. They are not hard to find. Antizionist Jewish websites explain very succinctly why that zionism causes the blurring of the distinction between the Jews and zionist Jews and increases anti Jewish sentiment toward all Jews. It is like zionism is designed to make people hate Jews.
Originally posted by Jermicide
Like I mentioned on another thread today dealing with some of the same things.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Just because WE can realize a difference between Anti-Zionism as a political movement and Anti-Semitism does not mean that those that ARE anti one or the other sees a difference.
In America and other like countries we tend to think things through to the point of finding these differences to be able to say things like "I support the Jews, but not Israel" But go to another mid eastern country and see if anyone there holds a difference between Jews and Israel. I bet they do not.
Ask the same what the difference in being Jewish and being a Zionist is, and again I bet that they don't see a difference. Even if some of the rest of us do.
en.wikipedia.org...
American journalist Michael Massing argues that there is a lack of media coverage on the Israel lobby and posits this explanation: "Why the blackout? For one thing, reporting on these groups is not easy. AIPAC's power makes potential sources reluctant to discuss the organization on the record, and employees who leave it usually sign pledges of silence. AIPAC officials themselves rarely give interviews, and the organization even resists divulging its board of directors." Massing writes that in addition to AIPAC's efforts to maintain a low profile, "journalists, meanwhile, are often loath to write about the influence of organized Jewry. In the end, though, the main obstacle to covering these groups is fear." Steven Rosen, a former director of foreign-policy issues for AIPAC, explained to Jeffrey Goldberg of The New Yorker that "a lobby is like a night flower: it thrives in the dark and dies in the sun."
Immigrants don't hunt BP they avoid them.
"Five illegal immigrants (Firstly their Cartel and not immigrants if they are) armed with at least two AK-47 semi-automatic assault rifles (and) were hunting for U.S. Border Patrol agents"
No it isn't a coincidence, many are state (Israel) sponsored stooges. The transparency of the tactic is so unbelievable obvious I doubt any intelligent neutral would not see this. However, anti-Zionism is not racist at all and all ant-Zionists are not anti-Semitic - an example being me.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
If you've read this board long enough you will see that many of the people who are anti-semitic in general also happen to be..."coincidentally"...anti-zionist.
But its not really a coincidence. Before Israel existed they hated the Jews who wanted to move back to their homeland. Same thing.
You have spent at least three years studying a topic and still managed to come to an utterly contrived, illogical and state sponsored conclusion? What are you doctored for proving exactly? That PhDs are handed out for making things up?
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
Originally posted by Vardoger
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
reply to post by Pimander
Are Anti Zionism and Anti-Semitism the Same?
Yes.
Anti-Zionism is the new Anti-Semitism.
Please tell us.....why? How have you come to this conclusion?
Years of research.
In fact sooooooo much research I should have phd in this stuff.
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
What is this nonsense?
All Germans are Nazis now?
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
reply to post by Pimander
Are Anti Zionism and Anti-Semitism the Same?
Yes.
Anti-Zionism is the new Anti-Semitism.
The land "belongs" to the native Palestinians and other ethnic groups - not to any religion.
Originally posted by Pimander
SOURCE: en.wikipedia.org...
This article presents a list of notable historical references to the name Palestine, and cognates such as Filastin and Palaestina, through the various time periods of the region.
The term Peleset (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in numerous Egyptian documents referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c.1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. The first mention is thought to be in texts of the temple at Medinet Habu which record a people called the Peleset among the Sea Peoples who invaded Egypt in Ramesses III's reign.[1] The Assyrians called the same region Palashtu or Pilistu, beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c.800 BCE through to emperor Sargon II in his Annals approximately a century later.[2][3][4] Neither the Egyptian or Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term.
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the region synonymous with that defined in modern times was in 5th century BC Ancient Greece. Herodotus wrote of a 'district of Syria, called Palaistinê" in The Histories, the first historical work clearly defining the region, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley.[5][6][7][8][9][10] Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition in Meteorology, writing "Again if, as is fabled, there is a lake in Palestine, such that if you bind a man or beast and throw it in it floats and does not sink, this would bear out what we have said. They say that this lake is so bitter and salt that no fish live in it and that if you soak clothes in it and shake them it cleans them," understood by scholars to be a reference to the Dead Sea.[11]
Originally posted by CharlesMartel
The land "belongs" to the native Palestinians and other ethnic groups - not to any religion.
Originally posted by Pimander
Theft is the rule of law in your primitive world is it?
Originally posted by IblisLucifer
Land Belongs to whomever is Strong enough to take it and keep it.
Its all about the team one plays on showing who and what there goals are for or against
But nothing lasts forever
The first clear use of the term Palestine to refer to the region synonymous with that defined in modern times was in 5th century BC Ancient Greece. Herodotus wrote of a 'district of Syria, called Palaistinê" in The Histories, the first historical work clearly defining the region, which included the Judean mountains and the Jordan Rift Valley.[5][6][7][8][9][10] Approximately a century later, Aristotle used a similar definition in Meteorology, writing "Again if, as is fabled, there is a lake in Palestine, such that if you bind a man or beast and throw it in it floats and does not sink, this would bear out what we have said. They say that this lake is so bitter and salt that no fish live in it and that if you soak clothes in it and shake them it cleans them," understood by scholars to be a reference to the Dead Sea.