It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If there was every any question that the top Brass are in favor of the North American Union: these insignia indicate that they have already accepted the idea and are implementing it. This might be the payback for supporting the Obama regime: top Brass get military power over entire continent!
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 5. United States defined
The term “United States”, as used in this title in a territorial sense, includes all places and waters,
continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except the Canal Zone.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 685.)
TITLE 49 - TRANSPORTATION
SUBTITLE VI - MOTOR VEHICLE AND DRIVER PROGRAMS
PART A - GENERAL
CHAPTER 303 - NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER
§ 30301. Definitions
(7) “State” means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands,
Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and
any other territory or possession of the United States.
TITLE 4 - FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES
CHAPTER 3 - SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT
§ 71. Permanent seat of Government
All that part of the territory of the United States included within the present limits of the District
of Columbia shall be the permanent seat of government of the United States.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 643.)
No Zip Codes
(Use invokes Federal Jurisdiction)
(Author unknown)
Use of the Zip is voluntary. See Domestic Regulations. Section 122.32 as amended. You should
also know that the Postal service cannot discriminate against the non-use of the Zip Code. See
"Postal Reorganization Act ", Section 403, (Public Law, 91-375). The federal government
utilizes the ZIP code to prove that you reside in a “federal district of the District of Columbia”.
This is why the IRS and other government agencies (state and federal) require a Zip code when
they assert jurisdiction by sending you a letter. They claim that this speeds the mail, but this is a
sly and subtle TRICK. It is also prima facie evidence that you are a subject of Congress and a
"citizen of the District of Columbia " who is "resident " in one of the several states.
The receipt of mail with a ZIP code is one of the requirements for the IRS to have jurisdiction to
send you notices. The government cannot bill a Citizen of Texas, because he is not within the
purview of the MUNICIPAL LAWS of the District of Columbia. In fact, the Internal Revenue
Service has adopted the ZIP code areas as Internal Revenue Districts. See the Federal Register,
Volume 51, Number 53, Wednesday March 19, 1986.
You must remember that the Postal Service is a private corporation, a quasi-government agency.
It is no longer a full government agency. It is like the Federal Reserve System, the Internal
Revenue Service, and the United States and the United States Marshall Service. They are all
outside the restrictions of the Federal Constitution, as private corporations. They are all powerful
in their respective areas of responsibility, to enforce collection for the federal debt. So, if you are
using a ZIP code, you are in effect saying openly and notoriously that you do not live in the State
of Texas, etc, but instead are a resident in the Texas area of the District of Columbia (a federal
district). There are some so-called Patriot groups that I consider Patriots for money. They
advocate the use of Title 42 suits (which are for federal citizens only), send mail to you with a
ZIP code, and ask you to do things that place you within the municipal jurisdiction of the District
of Columbia.
Remember these individuals may be agents of the government or, even worse, are advocating a
one world government by the use of the Social Security number and the ZIP code.
So you must be aware of the movement towards a one world government through annihilation or
elimination of State Citizens by use of the so-called 14th Amendment and its related laws.
It is this writer's opinion, both as a result of study, e.g. of page 11 of the National Area ZIP code
Directory, of 26 U.S.C. 7621, of Section 4 of the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, of
(TDO) 150-01; of the opinion in United States v LaSalle National Bank, 437 U.S. 298, 308, 98, 5
Ct 2d 2357, 571. Ed. 2d 221 (1978); of 12 U.S.C. 222; of 31 U.S.C. 103, and as a result of My
actual experience, that a ZIP code address is presumed to create a "Federal jurisdiction " or
“market venue” or “revenue districts” that override State boundaries, taking one who uses such
modes of address outside of a State venue and its constitutional protections and into an
international, commercial venue involving admiralty concerns of the "United States ", which is a
commercial corporation domiciled in Washington, D. C.
The term “United States”, as used in this title in a territorial sense, includes all places and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except the Canal Zone
includes all places and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
all places and waters, continental or insular...
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by daddio
The only hangup I see is Canada. Specifically Quebec. They seem to be pretty happy with their status quo, and I don't believe they will readily accept the NAU. I could be wrong, and they could be insignificant in number and resistance, but I think they are the existing snag in the operation going full forward.
The Maritime Command and Air Command will again be known as the Royal Canadian Navy and Royal Canadian Air Force, while the Land Force Command will be renamed the Canadian Army.
"The current reversion to the Royal Canadian Air Force and Royal Canadian Navy merely re-establishes a nominal link between the military and the Crown that has always existed in law," he said via email.
The 5th Army was organized in North African, which shows in the design of the patch. The design of the patch was submitted by General Mark Clark. The 5th Army fought along the west coast of Italy, until the Allies reached the Po Valley, where it spread out in both directions. The 5th Army bore the brunt of many of the battles as the British 8th Army was tired from fighting in North Africa.
Worn from: 2 April 1943 - Current.
The first Fifth Army design was abandoned at the request of Commanding General Mark Clark who wanted a patch that was more representative of the area in which the Fifth was formed. The second design is an outlined figure of a mosque, represen- tative of Morocco, North Africa, where the army was activated in January 1943. The letter "A" indicates army. From Operation Avalanche -- the invasion of Italy at the Gulf of Salerno -- to its final push across the Po Valley, the Fifth Army engaged in 604 continuous days of combat.
UPDATE — Nov. 3, 9 pM ET: See my comment below; there is solid evidence that this insignia does not have a nefarious signification; only one which is apt to be misunderstood in the present political climate.
CE says:
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by daddio
The only hangup I see is Canada. Specifically Quebec. They seem to be pretty happy with their status quo, and I don't believe they will readily accept the NAU. I could be wrong, and they could be insignificant in number and resistance, but I think they are the existing snag in the operation going full forward.
Originally posted by daddio
If there was every any question that the top Brass are in favor of the North American Union: these insignia indicate that they have already accepted the idea and are implementing it. This might be the payback for supporting the Obama regime: top Brass get military power over entire continent!
The "U.S.", as DEFINED 450 times in the "USC" and the "CFR" is THIS and THIS only.....
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
...
§ 5. United States defined
The term “United States”, as used in this title in a territorial sense, includes all places and waters,
continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except the Canal Zone....
Now, does it say ANYWHERE in that text, "to include the 50 states of the union" or "the 50 union states of America" or anything of the like? No?
Being that each state has its own legislature, they are foreign countries TO the "Federal united States", yes that IS spelled correctly, dot your "i's" and cross your "T's".
I went through most of the code again and noticed that the definitions for the "U.S." and for "U.S. citizen" had been removed.
Could it be that TOO many people are reading?
Could it be that too many people are using these definitions to put a stop to the intrusions on their lives? Remember, YOU are NOT a "U.S. citizen" UNLESS you were born in a federal ZONE. You are an American National, a free and sovereign entity which does NOT owe its existence to ANY government.
It is like the Federal Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service, and the United States and the United States Marshall Service. They are all outside the restrictions of the Federal Constitution, as private corporations.
Originally posted by daddio
I went through most of the code again and noticed that the definitions for the "U.S." and for "U.S. citizen" had been removed. Could it be that TOO many people are reading? Could it be that too many people are using these definitions to put a stop to the intrusions on their lives? Remember, YOU are NOT a "U.S. citizen" UNLESS you were born in a federal ZONE. You are an American National, a free and sovereign entity which does NOT owe its existence to ANY government. We lose sight of that and we are done for!!!!
Originally posted by Alethea
Originally posted by daddio
I went through most of the code again and noticed that the definitions for the "U.S." and for "U.S. citizen" had been removed. Could it be that TOO many people are reading? Could it be that too many people are using these definitions to put a stop to the intrusions on their lives? Remember, YOU are NOT a "U.S. citizen" UNLESS you were born in a federal ZONE. You are an American National, a free and sovereign entity which does NOT owe its existence to ANY government. We lose sight of that and we are done for!!!!
Not quite right. You BECOME a US citizen by accepting their monopoly game pieces. Once you accept the corporate identity that has been compelled upon you, you become a property of the corporation. Thus, a US citizen is a human resource that belongs to the company. This makes that person an owned possession. You all say you are not owned? Have you read the fine print on all your cards? Did you realize you signed away your life and your labor as bailment for privileges for the monopoly game pieces?
Originally posted by GringoViejo
The term “United States”, as used in this title in a territorial sense, includes all places and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except the Canal Zone
Um, this explicitly includes the 50 states. That's what the words you posted mean when used together in that particular order. Just because they didn't say "the 50 states of the union" isn't indicative of anything.
Specifically, this part:
includes all places and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
Get that?
all places and waters, continental or insular...
The part that pretty much wraps it up:
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
edit on 25-10-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius; A maxim of statutory interpretation meaning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325; Newblock v. Bowles, 170 Okl. 487, 40 P.2d 1097, 1100. Mention of one thing implies exclusion of another. When certain persons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclude all others from its operation may be inferred. Under this maxim, if statute specifies one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects of a certain provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded. Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition (emphasis mine)
Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius; /inklũwzh(iy)ow yanáyəs ést əksklũwzh(iy)ow oltíriyəs/. The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325. Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition (emphasis mine)
"When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are supposed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts." - YICK WO v. HOPKINS, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)