It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Actually, I got a better idea. Since you are "exactly sure" the burden of proof is upon you.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
First of all no one denied that the chemtrails came from an airplane. The confusion is about whether or not the object seen at the 10 second mark is what caused one of the chemtrails for the first few seconds of the video.
So your argument is pointless really. But I would still love it if you could prove what everyone else already agreed upon
Originally posted by adeclerk
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Actually, I got a better idea. Since you are "exactly sure" the burden of proof is upon you.
Nope. The claimant of "these are not normal contrails that have been around since the beginning of aviation" has the burden of proof. You are claiming something out of the ordinary, I'm going with the evidence (and lack of "chemtrail" evidence).
It's like if you started to claim that the sun was another planet. Burden of proof is on you to support your claim, could you support your "chemstuff" claim?
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
First of all no one denied that the chemtrails came from an airplane. The confusion is about whether or not the object seen at the 10 second mark is what caused one of the chemtrails for the first few seconds of the video.
So your argument is pointless really. But I would still love it if you could prove what everyone else already agreed upon
No "chemtrail" has ever been shown, supported, or proven to have come out of an airplane. It's hilarious that you have lapped up what the charlatans are selling you, though.
Either way I can't be exactly sure. None of us can.
I also had trouble believing it could be another plane at higher altitude because of how it was in synch with the other two planes that appeared to be lower.
Do you understand math?
That plane is a perfect example of a plane that can put out multiple trails.
The "two" trails on the left at the beginning of the video are actually from one airplane....
The plane to our right is only spraying one.
Cirrus aviaticus
www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org...
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Snarky, much?
Do you understand math?
Now, this is odd, since everyone should already realize this:
That plane is a perfect example of a plane that can put out multiple trails.
Yes, one per engine. Thought that was obvious (??)
Still talking about the A-340 video?:
The "two" trails on the left at the beginning of the video are actually from one airplane....
Again, note the A-340 has FOUR engines, two each wing.
Still talking about the A-340 video?:
The plane to our right is only spraying one.
Huh? The video shows two A-340s, each form different airlines. You did notice the cut in the footage, when the camera was turned off, then turned on later for the second airplane?
Please clarify....because you are not making any sense.
Point to a time reference, it's only polite, rather than making blanket claims and expecting people to just guess (though, I see there is always a reflexive star-giver....:shk: )
edit on Sat 15 October 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
That plane is a perfect example of a plane that can put out multiple trails.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by luxordelphi
I think you made him mad
(or so-called "persistent
contrails" — a term that was coined in the 1990's to describe the "new phenomenon" that was being seen in our skies)
(or so-called "persistent
contrails" — a term that was coined in the 1990's to describe the "new phenomenon" that was being seen in our skies)
didn't read the poem;
skipped to the circles in the sky or should I say cirrus aviaticus?