It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by rwfresh
Figured out that he could run? hide? live off the good graces of others?
Stand up guy.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Let us discuss the real issue rather than simply label the individual with a pejorative derogatory phrase which essentially functions as a thought-terminating-cliche.
By saying "deserter" you are avoiding the issue completely and just using a mere insult to ridicule. There is no logical conclusion to a debate, no retort of intellectual substance.
Originally posted by KILL_DOGG
reply to post by Six6Six
It's those of us who stand up for our country and aren't afraid to spill a little of our own blood to ensure our families get to sleep safe at night that don't need to spout off about our own courage.
Aw c'mon, that described a soldier in the two World wars, but not today. They fabricated an enemy with a good PR propaganda plan, then sent you people to go after them. Search YT on this point, if you don't believe how the war in Iraq and Afghanistan got started. If your family doesn't feel safe, perhaps you ought to begin to question just why they would feel that way. Perhaps it's too much unjustified soldiering and interference in other sovereign countries maybe? I certainly don't want to dimish your courage, and I grieve the loss of everyone who is killed in this senseless slaughtering, both soldiers and civilians. However I do wish you'd think about a better way to use that courage.
The "My country (government) right or wrong" is also not applicable any more. The entire planet is now seeing that. I disagree with the statement that everyone who signs up knows what they are getting into. If that were true, then there'd be no PTSD among so many vets. Just like marriage and parenthood, no one really knows just what it will be like until you enter those two institutions.
Is it just possible that by softening soldiers to shoot at civilians, it fulfills a purpose, namely that of being able to shoot their own countrymen when their governement tells them to, as things decline everywhere according to the NWO plan? While it's loyalty to your squad in theater is necessary, each person is an individual and part of growing up is being able to make hard and unpopular decisions. I love my country, and my people, but my government is setting us on a course that I really abhor. I am truly in fear for my children's future. And soldiers are but pawns in that dominance game, while civilians are expendable, so it would seem.
edit on 6-10-2011 by aboutface because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KILL_DOGG
He deserves what he gets and I hope he serves as an example to anyone who takes an oath of service and then runs out on his squad mates. In short...I hope he rots.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by KILL_DOGG
He deserves what he gets and I hope he serves as an example to anyone who takes an oath of service and then runs out on his squad mates. In short...I hope he rots.
War is stupid and many people are just pawns. There is a reason that there are dehumanizing strategies upon enlistment...so that the soldiers are first and foremost trained to obey the chain of command without question.
As well, there is a specific push by military recruiters to target low income areas for new recruits...emphasizing the compensation and not the reality of war. Truth be told, the mainstream media/entertainment industry do the same thing and we are subtly taught that war is good and necessary and all of that good stuff.
Good for him for bailing; I hope he gets to stay in Canada or has the wherewithal to get the hell out of dodge before he is deported into U.S. custody...and you sir, [SNIP] thinking that an oath should mean the same to everyone in every life circumstance. Last I checked, life and people change all of the time. There is also a very low tolerance I have for people who wish ill on other people who wish to not impose undue will or violence upon others.