It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TXRabbit
Thank you for pointing out evidence that an object roughly the same size and weight of a missile will leave next to 0 debris upon impact.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Personally, I find it disappointing that someone genuinely needs to point out to plane crashes like this to "convince" these conspiracy people that, yes, a plane really did hit the Pentagon. The thing hit during rush hour and there were hundreds of eyewitnesses, so the claim that secret conspirators would shoot a cruise missile and plant hundreds of phony eyewitnesses to falsely testify it was a plane, and then plant so many bits of aircraft wreckage on the Pentagon lawn in broad daylight in front of all the rubber neckers gawking at what was going on without anyone noticing is beyond asinine.
What I don't understand is why the conspiracy people aren't simply claiming the plane that hit the Pentagon was remote controlled by expert CIA drone pilots. It would conform with all the empirical evidence (I.E. aircraft wreckage), fill in the blanks they think they're seeing (I.E. how the plane was expertly flown into the Pentagon) AND still satisfy their need to wallow in abject paranoia (IE. it's all a false flag operation in a sinister secret plot to take over the world).
If they wanted to insist they were really "expert Jewish World Order drone pilots" instead, fine, the point is still the same.edit on 23-9-2011 by GoodOlDave because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
So how could a plane do much damage to the core after hitting the STEEL of the exterior of the towers?
One step forward two steps back.
psik
Originally posted by Saltarello
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
So how could a plane do much damage to the core after hitting the STEEL of the exterior of the towers?
One step forward two steps back.
psik
It must have been the molten aluminium reacting with the water in the steel of the towers.
Truthers make the claim that the tail always survive a crash.