It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
Why is it that the mass media makes mistakes on EVERY major news story day ("Jim Brady has died" "11 of 12 miners found alive" "Columbia was traveling at 18 times the speed of light" etc) and that is expected and accepted. When the BBC screws up one thing on 9/11, it becomes conspiracy fodder, why is that?
Why is it when it takes professional demolition crews MONTHS to wire small buildings for demolition, people think that both Towers and WTC7 were wired in less than a day, why is that?
Why is it, that when throughout history engineering projects prove to have fatal flaws (Challenger, Tacoma Narrows Bridge, KC Hyatt walkways, Ford Pinto), people will accept the word of an engineer that a building would survive being hit by an airliner without question, why is that?
That should be a decent start.....if I think of others, I will add them, but for now......lets discuss.....
Originally posted by vipertech0596
Been awhile since I have started a thread and after reading several threads this week, Ive come up with some questions for discussion.
Why is it that the mass media makes mistakes on EVERY major news story day ("Jim Brady has died" "11 of 12 miners found alive" "Columbia was traveling at 18 times the speed of light" etc) and that is expected and accepted. When the BBC screws up one thing on 9/11, it becomes conspiracy fodder, why is that?
Why is it when it takes professional demolition crews MONTHS to wire small buildings for demolition, people think that both Towers and WTC7 were wired in less than a day, why is that?
Why is it that when George Bush, on a good day, could hardly string together two sentences without mangling the rules of grammer, people expect him to be English Professor perfect on one of the worst days in American History, why is that?
Why is it, that when throughout history engineering projects prove to have fatal flaws (Challenger, Tacoma Narrows Bridge, KC Hyatt walkways, Ford Pinto), people will accept the word of an engineer that a building would survive being hit by an airliner without question, why is that?
That should be a decent start.....if I think of others, I will add them, but for now......lets discuss.....
Originally posted by vipertech0596
people think that both Towers and WTC7 were wired in less than a day, why is that?
Originally posted by vipertech0596
people will accept the word of an engineer that a building would survive being hit by an airliner without question, why is that?
Because saying a building has collapsed when it hasn't, and then lo and behold it does, is more than a 'mistake'.
Furthermore, the continued singling out of the most outrageous theories that are not accepted by the greater truth movement, and then trying to associate those outrageous, unaccepted theories with the entire truth movement, shows there is an agenda in progress
How did 3 buildings defy physics.
Originally posted by Myendica
Why is it, that you appear to just be trying to mimic Ron Paul with this thread? What if your questions go unanswered? Nothing! What happens if you refuse a new investigation? Nothing good!
ANOK got it right. End of discussion.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
Really? Hmm....since im not a Ron Paul fan, I wouldn't know if I was doing what you accuse me of.
As for my questions, I dont really expect an HONEST answer from someone on the "truther" side of the debate. Too great a chance they would have to admit their positions aren't logical.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by vipertech0596
Why is it that the mass media makes mistakes on EVERY major news story day ("Jim Brady has died" "11 of 12 miners found alive" "Columbia was traveling at 18 times the speed of light" etc) and that is expected and accepted. When the BBC screws up one thing on 9/11, it becomes conspiracy fodder, why is that?
Because saying a building has collapsed when it hasn't, and then lo and behold it does, is more than a 'mistake'.
Especially in light of all the evidence of controlled demolition.
As far as I know no one is claiming that. IMO they could have been set up months before 911.
I don't think anyone is believing that without question. Anyone with an engineering background can see why that would be a fact anyway, it's only questionable to the layman. But regardless what difference does it make to anything? There is more to the collapses than just what the planes did, or didn't do.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by Myendica
You might want to research my posts. I've stated on numerous occasions why you will never see an "honest" investigation and why an "honest" investigation would not be in the countries best interest due to the witchhunt it would become.