It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Two skeletons from Cladh Hallan, on South Uist in the Western Isles Scotland, seem to have been deliberately mummified – and one was only buried an estimated five hundred years after he died, both of the skeletons provide evidence of mummification and post mortem manipulation of body parts. Perhaps these practices were widespread in Bronze Age Britain?
DNA tests on British prehistoric mummies revealed they were made of body parts from several different people, arranged to look like one person.
He said as part of ancestral worship, the mummies probably would have been asked for spiritual advice to help the community make decisions.
In order for the bodies to have been found as articulated skeletons as they were, rather than piles of bones, some soft tissue preservation had to have taken place. Further tests showed that the bones had become demineralised, a process caused by placing a body in an acidic environment like a peat bog. The degree of demineralisation on the bones found showed that after death, the bodies had been placed in bogs for about a year to mummify them before being recovered.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
I wrote a thread ages ago that failed miserably, but remains my favourite. It's all about the 'mummies' and has some great pictures...Ancient Crimes and Sacrifices.
When somebody died in the Iron Age, the body was cremated in a funeral pyre, the ashes and the bones were placed in an urn and buried. However, this is not what happened to the Tollund Man or the other bog bodies which have been discovered. It is a strong indication that they were sacrifices to the gods.Source
Originally posted by Mimir
Very nice and interesting find. Most of the bronzeage mummies are bog-mummies, not mummified on purpose.
Originally posted by Versa
Originally posted by Mimir
Very nice and interesting find. Most of the bronze age mummies are bog-mummies, not mummified on purpose.
These are also 'bog mummies' but they were removed from the bog after about a year.
I think what Kandinsky is pondering is how many of the bog mummies were also intended to be exhumed but for one reason or another remained in the bog.
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
I wonder if some of the random hills in the UK could be ancient pyramids covered with vegetation now?
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
I wonder if some of the random hills in the UK could be ancient pyramids covered with vegetation now?
I've suspected that many hills in the UK might be tombs, not necessarily strictly pyramids.
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
I wonder if some of the random hills in the UK could be ancient pyramids covered with vegetation now?
Source: www.hotspotsz.com...
Silbury Hill may well have been a tomb, not for bodies, but for the souls of the dead. The English Heritage dig [2007], which cost £1m, tunnelled 85 metres into the 40-metre-high man-made hill, discovering that its Neolithic builders had incorporated hundreds of heavy sarsen stones into its matrix. Sarsen, the silicified sandstone still found in greatquantities in Wiltshire, was also used to build Stonehenge and Avebury [stone circles].
Source: www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk...
The Uffington Horse, Uffington 'Castle' and Dragon Hill are all located beside the ancient track called the 'Ridgeway'. Dragon Hill itself is an artificially levelled chalk outcrop below and immediately in front of the Uffington White Horse. Tradition claims the bare chalk patch on the top of the hill to have been caused by the blood spilled when St. George slew the dragon.
Originally posted by Pimander
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c4b9108b0901.jpg[/atsimg]
Source: www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk...
The Uffington Horse, Uffington 'Castle' and Dragon Hill are all located beside the ancient track called the 'Ridgeway'. Dragon Hill itself is an artificially levelled chalk outcrop below and immediately in front of the Uffington White Horse. Tradition claims the bare chalk patch on the top of the hill to have been caused by the blood spilled when St. George slew the dragon.
Don't you just love the ancient Britain stuff. So mysterious.
Oh yes, what do you think folks? Could sacred hills like Dragon Hill be tombs?
Originally posted by Pimander
Of course, we mustn't forget Glastonbury Tor. It is after all the supposed resting place of King Arthur. Although probably a load of baloney, these types of story do show an association of hills with the dead....
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/36304d463ad3.jpg[/atsimg]
Well you can hardly say I didn't give you a nudge.
Originally posted by Versa
lol I dont know how I didnt bring up Glastonbury Tor, its a couple of miles down the road from me
ETA if I could star you twice for that I would That goes to show you often don't see what's under your own nose