Anders Behring Breivik's Video Manifesto Titled Knights Templar 2083 (Watch)

Haven't seen this yet so I'll put it up.

This would be Berwick's video to back up his 1500 page Manifesto that was posted earlier but removed. The manifesto itself is quite telling in that this was apparently a man that has been planning an event for a long time and not just a random or sudden action.

Without going into putting the 1500 pages here, this is an example of what can be found within the pages:

Knights Templar 2083 - Movie Trailer
www.veoh.com...

From the first pages of that Manifesto:

“The men the European public admires most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.” You can see a movie presentation of the compendium by visiting the below links. It will not be available for a long period so consider taking a backup copy of it:

www.youtube.com...
www.veoh.com...

After years of work the first edition of the compendium “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence” is completed. If you have received this book, you are either one of my former 7000 patriotic Facebook friends or you are the friend of one of my FB friends. If you are concerned about the future of Western Europe you will definitely find the information both interesting and highly relevant.

I have spent several years writing, researching and compiling the information and I have spent most of my hard earned funds in this process (in excess of 300 000 Euros). I do not want any compensation for it as it is a gift to you, as a fellow patriot. Much of the information presented in this compendium (3 books) has been deliberately kept away from the European peoples by our governments and the politically correct mainstream media (MSM).

More than 90% of the EU and national parliamentarians and more than 95% of journalists are supporters of European multiculturalism and therefore supporters of the ongoing Islamic colonisation of Europe; yet, they DO NOT have the permission of the European peoples to implement these doctrines. The compendium, - “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence” - documents through more than 1000 pages that the fear of Islamisation is all but irrational. It covers the following main topics:

1. The rise of cultural Marxism/multiculturalism in Western Europe
2. Why the Islamic colonization and Islamisation of Western Europe began
3. The current state of the Western European Resistance Movements (anti-Marxist/anti-Jihad movements)
4. Solutions for Western Europe and how we, the resistance, should move forward in the coming decades
5. + Covering all, highly relevant topics including solutions and strategies for all of the 8 different political fronts

Photo from the bottom of the Manifesto. Does anyone recognize these badges?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7f6906ee3cc3.png[/atsimg]

I just downloaded his 1,500 page manifesto and it is honestly one of the most eerie things that I have ever read. He also included pics of himself with the gun that he may have possibly used in the shooting...he is a VERY disturbed individual.. Not sure what the badges are though...

www.abovetopsecret.com... I think he beat you to it bro .

Originally posted by hyperion.martin
I just downloaded his 1,500 page manifesto and it is honestly one of the most eerie things that I have ever read. He also included pics of himself with the gun that he may have possibly used in the shooting...he is a VERY disturbed individual.. Not sure what the badges are though...

The whole thing is eerily strange yet intelligently written.

The video is also mesmerizing.

The document lays out fertilizers and how to use them, store etc. Makes me think something else was in the works.

reply to post by jude11


I agree, it almost seems probable that the killings were just for the purpose of gathering attention for his manifesto...he is a blond hair, blue eyed intelligent man who committed an atrocity involving motives that include protecting his motherland. I would imagine many neo- radicals have already read his manifesto...in a way he already won.

Did you notice the part where it says "stage one" is shock and awe (bad paraphrasing) and "stage two" is sabotage...

I have been skimming/scanning the 1500 page manifesto for the last 5 hours or so. Here are some preliminary impressions, in no particular order, subject to revision upon deeper reading of course.

-He appears to draw from many sources. Much of that 1500 pages is copied and pasted from elsewhere. However, he definitely has a plan and has organized it systematically.

-A very systematic mind, seems almost a cliched bulesque of the "extreme paranoid"/compulsive-sadistic personality type, so to speak.

-The document contains disturbing plans in detail for the creation of advanced explosives, chemical agents, and even more along such lines.

-The most disturbing thing of all: I believe he wants to create a meme. He wants to create a viral movement of self-appointed anonymous members sharing the same ideals, who can "plug into" his organizational framework. Sound familiar?

-Everything about it is far more detailed than I could have imagined. This man spent ten years planning this event and acting systematically toward his goals. Ten years. He had the patience of a true human predator. For example, he describes how he delibrately began distancing himself from close friends in a series of laid-out steps, starting four years before the event, as just one example

-He had money at his disposal. He estimated that the cost at over EUR 300K and seems to have paid most or maybe all out of pocket. EDIT: Not sure about that, just came across a section where he talks about credit cards. So its hard to say where his resources came from.

-The document contains ambitious and detailed plans for a three-part 100-year war to defeat "Cultural Marxism" and drive Islam from Europe "for the third time."

reply to post by silent thunder


I agree with the meme idea, I am tempted to destroy it but...the intellectual force in me is reminding me that even tragic events are a learning experience...as any "manifesto" it is rife with propaganda, the best thing we can do now is to disprove it rather than ignore/erase it.

Originally posted by hyperion.martin
reply to post by silent thunder

 

I agree with the meme idea, I am tempted to destroy it but...the intellectual force in me is reminding me that even tragic events are a learning experience...as any "manifesto" it is rife with propaganda, the best thing we can do now is to disprove it rather than ignore/erase it.

I agree with you. I have believed all my life it is an absolute wrong to burn books and suppress ideas of any sort. Balance is reached not by attempting an impossible retrogression into ignorance but by adding the requisite new information needed to climb out and see the light of truth.

reply to post by silent thunder


You said it better than I could good sir.

Question is was he an ATS member. I hope not I think this guy brainwashed himself possibly through the internet. I just hope he was a lone nutter and not part of a wider group all with the same mission.

reply to post by tarifa37


I have been looking through the threads and I can's seem to find anybody that may have been him. The mods seem to be pretty good at finding out these things though.

Originally posted by jude11
"...Photo from the bottom of the Manifesto. Does anyone recognize these badges?..."
[photo omitted]

According to the manifesto, he consideres himself something called a "Justiciar Knight". This apparently is a "Judge, Jury, and Executioner" on behalf of "the free indigenous peoples of Europe." A sort of neo-medieval Judge Dredd, I suppose, if you will. Actually, along more serious lines it reminds me of the ideology 1970s US extremist group Posse Comitatus, who derived their supposed legitimacy from a tortured reinterpretation of the justice system that collapsed all authority into one person.

The patch on his arm in the photo is explained as below in the text:

The badge of the Justiciar Knight illustrates a white skull, marked with the symbols of communism, Islam and Nazism on the forehead, impaled on the cross of the martyrs. The background is black. The badge of the Justiciar Knight illustrates our patriotic struggle/ opposition against all three primary hate ideologies of our time: Islam, Multiculturalism (Communism) and Nazism.

reply to post by silent thunder


Yeah I am beginning to think that the killing spree was just for shock value. The strange thing is...it is almost as if he had a fear reaction that his culture would be wiped out, yet he attacked a youth camp of his own people.
Is there any info as to whether he had reason to believe there were large numbers of "foreigners" at the camp? Or do you think he was just trying to make a point and taking out an opponents future supporters was just a bonus? It just seems like there is a disconnect between what he is saying and what happened...

Originally posted by hyperion.martin
reply to post by silent thunder

 

Yeah I am beginning to think that the killing spree was just for shock value. The strange thing is...it is almost as if he had a fear reaction that his culture would be wiped out, yet he attacked a youth camp of his own people.
Is there any info as to whether he had reason to believe there were large numbers of "foreigners" at the camp? Or do you think he was just trying to make a point and taking out an opponents future supporters was just a bonus? It just seems like there is a disconnect between what he is saying and what happened...

He saw the children at the camp as the children of the liberal elite who were being indoctrinated with the values he hated. He believed by killing them he was eliminating future members of Norway's leadership class, who he condemned as "traitors" for upholding multiculturalism.

Originally posted by silent thunder

Originally posted by hyperion.martin
reply to post by silent thunder

 

Yeah I am beginning to think that the killing spree was just for shock value. The strange thing is...it is almost as if he had a fear reaction that his culture would be wiped out, yet he attacked a youth camp of his own people.
Is there any info as to whether he had reason to believe there were large numbers of "foreigners" at the camp? Or do you think he was just trying to make a point and taking out an opponents future supporters was just a bonus? It just seems like there is a disconnect between what he is saying and what happened...

He saw the children at the camp as the children of the liberal elite who were being indoctrinated with the values he hated. He believed by killing them he was eliminating future members of Norway's leadership class, who he condemned as "traitors" for upholding multiculturalism.

edit on 7/24/11 by silent thunder because: (no reason given)

If this turns out to be true, it would seem that he is taking lessons from Hitler himself.

Trying to eliminate an entire race by going after the children.

Originally posted by silent thunder


He saw the children at the camp as the children of the liberal elite who were being indoctrinated with the values he hated. He believed by killing them he was eliminating future members of Norway's leadership class, who he condemned as "traitors" for upholding multiculturalism.

THEY ARE TEACHING THE NEW GENERATION TO HAVE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.
IN OTHER WORDS TO LOVE THOSE WHO WOULD DESTROY THEIR SOCIETY.
AMAZING.




page 18 of 1500 of the Norwegians manifesto


TORRENT LOCATION; www.demonoid.me...

Introduction to the compendium - “2083” -


The introductory chapter explains how “cultural” Marxism gradually infiltrated our post-WW2 societies. It is essential to understand how it started in order to comprehend our current issues. The chapter was written for the US specifically but applies to Western Europe as well.




Introduction - What is “Political Correctness”?

One of conservatism’s most important insights is that all ideologies are wrong. Ideology takes an intellectual system, a product of one or more philosophers, and says, “This system must be true.” Inevitably, reality ends up contradicting the system, usually on a growing number of points. But the ideology, by its nature, cannot adjust to reality; to do so would be to abandon the system.

Therefore, reality must be suppressed. If the ideology has power, it uses its power to undertake this suppression. It forbids writing or speaking certain facts. Its goal is to prevent not only expression of thoughts that contradict what “must be true,” but thinking such thoughts. In the end, the result is inevitably the concentration camp, the gulag and the grave.

But what happens today to Europeans who suggest that there are differences among ethnic groups, or that the traditional social roles of men and women reflect their different natures, or that homosexuality is morally wrong? If they are public figures, they must grovel in the dirt in endless, canting apologies. If they are university students, they face star chamber courts and possible expulsion. If they are employees of private corporations, they may face loss of their jobs. What was their crime? Contradicting the new EUSSR ideology of “Political Correctness.”

But what exactly is “Political Correctness?” Marxists have used the term for at least 80 years, as a broad synonym for “the General Line of the Party.” It could be said that Political Correctness is the General Line of the Establishment in Western European countries today; certainly, no one who dares contradict it can be a member of that Establishment. But that still does not tell us what it really is.

We must seek to answer that question. The only way any ideology can be understood, is by looking at its historical origins, its method of analysis and several key components, including its place in higher education and its ties with the Feminist movement.

If we expect to prevail and restore our countries to full freedom of thought and expression, we need to know our enemy. We need to understand what Political Correctness really is. As you will soon see, if we can expose the true origins and nature of Political Correctness, we will have taken a giant step toward its overthrow.







How it all began - Political Correctness is Cultural Marxism

Most Europeans look back on the 1950s as a good time. Our homes were safe, to the point where many people did not bother to lock their doors. Public schools were generally excellent, and their problems were things like talking in class and running in the halls. Most men treated women like ladies, and most ladies devoted their time and effort to making good homes, rearing their children well and helping their communities through volunteer work. Children grew up in two–parent households, and the mother was there to meet the child when he came home from school. Entertainment was something the whole family could enjoy.

What happened?

If a man of the 1950s were suddenly introduced into Western Europe in the 2000s, he would hardly recognise it as the same country. He would be in immediate danger of getting mugged, carjacked or worse, because he would not have learned to live in constant fear. He would not know that he shouldn’t go into certain parts of the city, that his car must not only be locked but equipped with an alarm, that he dare not go to sleep at night without locking the windows and bolting the doors – and setting the electronic security system.

If he brought his family with him, he and his wife would probably cheerfully pack their children off to the nearest public school. When the children came home in the afternoon and told them they had to go through a metal detector to get in the building, had been given some funny white powder by another kid and learned that homosexuality is normal and good, the parents would be uncomprehending.

In the office, the man might light up a cigarette, drop a reference to the “little lady,” and say he was happy to see the firm employing some coloured folks in important positions. Any of those acts would earn a swift reprimand, and together they might get him fired.

When she went into the city to shop, the wife would put on a nice suit, hat, and possibly gloves. She would not understand why people stared, and mocked.

And when the whole family sat down after dinner and turned on the television, they would not understand how pornography from some sleazy, blank-fronted “Adults Only” kiosk had gotten on their set.

Were they able, our 1950s family would head back to the 1950s as fast as they could, with a gripping horror story to tell. Their story would be of a nation that had decayed and degenerated at a fantastic pace, moving in less than a half a century from the greatest countries on earth to Third World nations, overrun by crime, noise, drugs and dirt. The fall of Rome was graceful by comparison.

Why did it happen?

Over the last fifty years, Western Europe has been conquered by the same force that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany and Italy. That force is ideology. Here, as elsewhere, ideology has inflicted enormous damage on the traditional culture it came to dominate, fracturing it everywhere and sweeping much of it away. In its place came fear, and ruin. Russia will take a generation or more to recover from Communism, if it ever can.

The ideology that has taken over Western Europe goes most commonly by the name of “Political Correctness.” Some people see it as a joke. It is not. It is deadly serious. It seeks to alter virtually all the rules, formal and informal, that govern relations among people and institutions. It wants to change behaviour, thought, even the words we use. To a significant extent, it already has. Whoever or whatever controls language also controls thought. Who dares to speak of “ladies” now?

Just what is “Political Correctness?” Political Correctness is in fact cultural Marxism (Cultural Communism) – Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. The effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture did not begin with the student rebellion of the 1960s. It goes back at least to the 1920s and the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded an institute devoted to making the transition, the Institute of Social Research (later known as the Frankfurt School). One of its founders, George Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, “Who shall save us from Western Civilisation?” The Frankfurt School gained profound influence in European and American universities after many of its leading lights fled and spread all over Europe and even to the United States in the 1930s to escape National Socialism in Germany. In Western Europe it gained influence in universities from 1945.

reply to post by jude11


According to wikipedia the ribbon at the top left corner is the medal for heroic deeds

Wikipedia

Although military service in Norway is common, in form of national service. It makes you wonder whether all these are actually his. Or just a vanity photo!

Suspect that the top ribbon might be the Order of St Olaf (Knight)
Wiki

reply to post by JakiusFogg


Cnn said that he never served in the military so he probably just bought them. I wonder if the fact that he never served in the mandatory military service in Norway had some psychological effect... if so he has this in common with some of the American homegrown terrorists (trying to get in the military but not being accepted).

Originally posted by silent thunder

-The most disturbing thing of all: I believe he wants to create a meme. He wants to create a viral movement of self-appointed anonymous members sharing the same ideals, who can "plug into" his organizational framework. Sound familiar?

edit on 7/24/11 by silent thunder because: (no reason given)

I am 100% following you on that point.
This is what hive mentallity brings about. It detaches people from humanity so that they are capable of the most heinous acts.

I am sure there are plenty of sheeple who will eat this garbage manifesto up, they are already trained to think this way from the Anonymous herding.

reply to post by TinfoilTP


The other thing with something like this is that it is modifiable. This presents special problems as well. For example, any other extremist at all could take his book, chop out the ideological parts and imagery, insert their own, and use the weaponry plans and terror tips plus his concept of open-ended anonymous membership roles to create their own loony movement.

The idea is aready out of the bag so even if nobody follows this particular nutjob, chances are somebody else somewhere down the line puts the same concept to work in a way that resonnates with a larger number of people.

We're doombed.