It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
YES! This same phenomenon of people being obsessed with that which they insist is not real occurs on other topics too, especially theism and creationism. People who don't believe in God seem unable to stop flaming and bashing every single thread or comment about it, they stay parked in the Religion section and travel around in gangs it seems. Pathetic or psychotic or whatever, it isn't healthy for people to focus on things they don't believe in.
Originally posted by SaberTruth
YES! This same phenomenon of people being obsessed with that which they insist is not real occurs on other topics too, especially theism and creationism. People who don't believe in God seem unable to stop flaming and bashing every single thread or comment about it, they stay parked in the Religion section and travel around in gangs it seems. Pathetic or psychotic or whatever, it isn't healthy for people to focus on things they don't believe in.edit on 22-6-2011 by SaberTruth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NightGypsy
OP, the fact that there are a number individuals on ATS who jump on these topics or continuously post threads to debunk the chemtrail theories at any given time of the day or night and rarely show up in any other threads gives reason enough to believe there is something to be concerned about.
If a person thinks the chemtrail theories are pure nonsense, why would he bother? Why spend your day arguing with people you believe to speak nonsense? Why vehemently defend the government is there is truly nothing to defend? Why do they care what allegations people make about the government if the government has nothing to hide?
Either they are assisting in the cover-up, or it makes them feel important. Anyone with a shred of self-esteem wouldn't feel the need to spend so much time arguing an issue if they truly believed it was a joke.
I believe one would find the definition of such a person under the word "pathetic" in any dictionary of the English language.
Originally posted by DJW001
What about the people who go around bashing people who don't believe what they believe? You know, the ones who park themselves in the Religion forum travelling in gangs ripping on evolution? Are they pathetic or psychotic? It seems to me if one holds an opinion, one should welcome criticism; by overcoming objections, one can formulate a clearer picture if one is right, or, if the criticism is valid, reject one's false beliefs.
Having read the report apart from the temp error and the fact that we are to believe that contrail's last beyond 1-2 hours is the items i disagree with especially as this time last year there where no persistent contrail's hat so ever in the area in which i live.
For contrail's to form you need a temp of -40/-60 degrees to form how long they persist is a subject to debate and has been with no real prof on either side but the fact is that you need that temp to start with otherwise no contrail will form.
Also when clouds become oversaturated then the produce rain which in turn reduces the size of the cloud and if memory serves that is also due to a change in temp also so in affect how a cloud behaves is very different than how a contrail acts even though on a submicron level it would be hard to tell them apart after a 30 minute time frame.
Originally posted by SmoKeyHaZe
I wish this post could be used for every troll, sock puppet & purposeful dis-info agent around here, on all the major topics in ATS
I was a jet engine mechanic in the Navy and I can assure you that there is no such thing as "excess water" coming from jet engines. Gas turbines operating on principles discribed by Daniel Bernoulli and commonly referred to as Brayton or Joule cycle engines, generally burn JP3, 4, and 5 which have only infintesimal H2O content if at all.
Originally posted by djcarlosa
For contrail's to form you need a temp of -40/-60 degrees to form how long they persist is a subject to debate and has been with no real prof on either side
Originally posted by djcarlosa
I was a jet engine mechanic in the Navy and I can assure you that there is no such thing as "excess water" coming from jet engines. Gas turbines operating on principles discribed by Daniel Bernoulli and commonly referred to as Brayton or Joule cycle engines, generally burn JP3, 4, and 5 which have only infintesimal H2O content if at all. Con trails are formed by a process of cavitation especially with turbofan style jets in which not all the air goes into the compustion progess. Much of the air is driven by the intake turbine blades which drives the air around the combustion stage.
Originally posted by djcarlosa
reply to post by Uncinus
that site has no real information on time lines what so ever i have read reports thet do have timeline's its nothing better than a press release put together to Shepard you back into the flock.
Sometimes [contrails] are ephemeral and dissipate as quickly as they form; other times they persist and grow wide enough to cover a substantial portion of the sky with a sheet of cirrostratus“ (Page 137)