It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If people die when hearts, kidneys and livers fail, then how did anyone live while those organs “evolved?” The obvious answer is that they didn’t. Man began as he is today.
Those organs evolved as an assistance to living, not as a necessity.
Why? Well, those organs aren't necessarily for all life. Those organs evolved as an assistance to living, not as a necessity. Humans are also not the only species that have those organs, our direct ancestors almost certainly had them.
Originally posted by unbanable123
well, until proven otherwise i will stick with the god theroy lol,
would rather believe that then believe we evolved from monkeys.
but then i think monkeys are just a freak mutation caused by a nuke or some other radiation a from some past ancient civilization.
an evolution brought on by nuclear radiation nothing natural.
im still waiting to see some proof of tru evolution.
and dont try and say lucy was that proff with parts from humans and monkeys they just thru together.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by rhinoceros
Hell, there's documentation that humans have between 100-200 mutations separate from their parents...
Almost all were harmless, with no apparent effect on our health or appearance, and only four mutations accumulated over 13 generations.
These four mutations gave us the exact mutation rate - one in 30 million nucleotides each generation - that we had expected,” said Dr Tyler-Smith.
...there ends up being a reproductive barrier.
I'm not sure if I fully understand you, but are you suggesting that because Reproductive Isolation exists solely because of a genetic change that occurred over several million years?
How would such genetic differences to the point where reproductive isolation occurs happen without there being genetic change? This is change to the DNA. Selective breeding? It works through changing the gene pool in a population via artificially selecting out those that don't have the genetic traits.
Selective breeding? It works through changing the gene pool in a population via artificially selecting out those that don't have the genetic traits.
Evolution is merely a natural version of what we do with selective breeding. Nature selects for what survives and populations select for what is most desirable to mate with.
As I just posted, they are too insignificant to have any affect on us, even in the long run - because even if there were a massive genetic change occurring over millions of years, it wouldn't explain how all species came from a single celled organism.
Also, the fact that there are papers citing mutations means that they occur...which means that genetic code changes.
Originally posted by Solomons
reply to post by unbanable123
We did not evolve from monkeys and evolution is a fact. If shutting out parts of reality to make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside is your thing then by all means go ahead, just don't attempt to drag children into it by robbing them of a good education and being unable to appreciate and understand the wonders of nature and variety of life on this planet.edit on 10-5-2011 by Solomons because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lionhearte
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
...there ends up being a reproductive barrier.
You're referring to Reproductive Isolation, right? I don't see how I made any reference to it whatsoever, I'm well aware that two different species cannot breed and produce offspring.
I'm not sure if I fully understand you, but are you suggesting that because Reproductive Isolation exists solely because of a genetic change that occurred over several million years?
How would such genetic differences to the point where reproductive isolation occurs happen without there being genetic change? This is change to the DNA. Selective breeding? It works through changing the gene pool in a population via artificially selecting out those that don't have the genetic traits.
Selective breeding? It works through changing the gene pool in a population via artificially selecting out those that don't have the genetic traits.
Evolution is merely a natural version of what we do with selective breeding. Nature selects for what survives and populations select for what is most desirable to mate with.
That's exactly right - Survival of the Fittest, no? I have no argument against this, it's present in everyday life that the strongest survive. What it -doesn't- suggest, is how you can get all the species in the world today from a single celled organism that was, essentially, the first thing on Earth.
As I just posted, they are too insignificant to have any affect on us, even in the long run - because even if there were a massive genetic change occurring over millions of years, it wouldn't explain how all species came from a single celled organism.
Also, the fact that there are papers citing mutations means that they occur...which means that genetic code changes.
I will read that link about changes to DNA as soon as possible, but don't expect a response until I actually finish it. Wouldn't want to cut corners