It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
It's stupid. Just making sure that's clear before people post.
Why is it stupid? Well, if everyone was a woman we wouldn't have children either. Same with if everyone was born male. Hell, if everyone was born sterile we wouldn't have children. Does this make being a woman, man, or sterile wrong? Of course not.
In fact, there simply isn't a good argument for calling homosexuality immoral. All of them are as ridiculous as the aforementioned.
Originally posted by redoubt
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
It's stupid. Just making sure that's clear before people post.
Why is it stupid? Well, if everyone was a woman we wouldn't have children either. Same with if everyone was born male. Hell, if everyone was born sterile we wouldn't have children. Does this make being a woman, man, or sterile wrong? Of course not.
In fact, there simply isn't a good argument for calling homosexuality immoral. All of them are as ridiculous as the aforementioned.
It's all based on individual opinion. Just making sure we are clear on this.
Why is it just opinion? Because we can offer no more than that. Regardless of how smart we might think we are, we don't really have anything to offer but personal interpretations of various theories... scientific or religious, etc.
Now then, let's pretend that nature intended sex first and foremost as a means of reproduction. Yes, we know that is silly. Sex was really meant for our personal enjoyment only. But for the moment, we'll imagine that it was intended to assure the continuance of the species.
Oh, and as for religion? We won't even bring that into play because religion is basically an act of faith and is not as scientific as our sexual desires regardless of whatever they may be.
Sex for fun and hobby is always first... and anyone who disses this opinion is wrong because we are perfect in our knowledge otherwise.
But IF sex was meant for reproduction, then homosexuality would indeed run counter to that purpose because it simply and plainly defeats it. It kills it deader than an a cold stone. So, it's a good thing that we know better.
Now, if we were stupid enough to assume that sex was meant primarily for reproduction, then how would we defend homosexuality in a culture that is smart enough to know that sex was meant for pleasure first?
Well, we could say that as individuals, we are all in charge of how we use our bodies and if we were inclined to homosexual relationships, that is the right of that individual. after that, we would not need to defend it any further or cast insults at people who disagree.
But here again, we know that sex was also meant to amuse us so we COULD insult those who disagree.
Anyway, in closing... morally speaking... the greatest sin here on this thread is human arrogance. beyond that, what you do with your body should be up to you.
Oh... and the same goes for your personal opinion. You have a right to it but... in some circles, you don't so... nevermind. I wasn't here and I didn't say any of that.
Have a nice day
Originally posted by WeAreAWAKE
Originally posted by Turkenstein
reply to post by WeAreAWAKE
You're gonna love me for this one! No, some people are just weaker minded than others and prefer the safety of what they know, which is their own sex. I think it is a fear of having to compete with other men for females or vise versa that drive them into the arms of an unatural lover. If you tell yourself something enough you can convince yourself that you have always "just been that way." NOT A HATER JUST A STATER.....LOL
Then your position is that it is a choice? I basically agree, but I've seen many people with disorders or delusions and (IMO) being gay fits that better then a simple choice. Besides, if being gay is a choice...what a commitment
Originally posted by voidla
reply to post by infiniteobserver
But it does.
Dolphins, sheep, goats, ducks, primates, some of many animals that engage in homosexual and solo-pleasure.
Research is your friend.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by AngryOne
Here, do some scientific reading about how homosexuality has evolutionary benefits.
And again, so what if it's 'unnatural'. The internet is unnatural. Automobiles are unnatural. Corrective lenses? Unnatural. Houses? Also unnatural.
Natural doesn't mean good. Rape? That's perfectly natural...and it's also not good.