It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TechUnique
Source
I wonder how long it will be until the UN does some 'Peacekeeping' in Libya.
Actually scratch that, I wonder how long it will be until TPTB Rape the country and put a puppet in charge.
It also authorised "all necessary measures" -- code for military action -- to protect civilians against Gaddafi's forces.
The resolution appears to give legal weight to attacks against Col Muammar Gaddafi's ground forces.
4. Authorises member states that have notified the secretary-general, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in co-operation with the secretary-general, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the member states concerned to inform the secretary-general immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council;
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by RadicalRebel
Why don't you put the effort in. Have you read the actual resolution?
It explicitly prohibits ground forces.
EDIT: To save you the effort, wouldn't want you to hurt your fingers, after all... I've highlighted the relevant part in paragraph 4 of UNSC Resolution 1973:
4. Authorises member states that have notified the secretary-general, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in co-operation with the secretary-general, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the member states concerned to inform the secretary-general immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council;
edit on 19/3/11 by stumason because: (no reason given)
to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory
Originally posted by Esrom Escutcheon Esquire
This business with Libya really boils my blood.
It exposes alot of the hypocrisy steming from goverments world wide.
America wants to take a back seat so that they wont further tarnish their image to muslim population where all the uprising has been happening.
So they ask a joint UK and French team to lead the way in this... farce, whilst adding Kuwait and Qatar to support the no fly zone. Even recently, the Canadians are supporting this action.
Forcing out maddog and supporting an uprising.
So where is the line going to be drawn in the Sahara???
There are uprisings all across the Middle East, where the ruling goverments are doing their best to suppress any form of protest.
Will there be any action taken in any of the other countrys where the goverment has killed its people because it did not like what it heard?
With Bahrain, we have king Abdulla (s.p?) who has let neighbouring forces do the dirty work too suppress the peoples voices and has been invited to the Royal wedding...
Originally posted by Esrom Escutcheon Esquire
The UK wants to have this no fly zone to stop the expected massacre at Benghazi, when there has been massacres, genocides in plenty of other places outside of Libya.
Originally posted by Esrom Escutcheon Esquire
David Cameron can wave his magicwand and fund a course of military action, which may lead to war, whilst he cuts jobs and benifits.
Originally posted by Esrom Escutcheon Esquire
What a ¢¥n£!!!
Originally posted by john124
Ah well, you may as well go and support the mass-murdering sociopaths on their new adventure to distract us from economic calamities and their own financial terrorism. History always repeats itself.
Originally posted by john124
How many people dying in Yemen and Bahrain ?! (caused by UAE and Saudi's). UAE involved in carrying out the no-fly-zone!! WTF!!!
Originally posted by john124
And the Israeli PM calling for bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities whilst Japan suffers a nuclear catastrophe. Those are friends of the corporate west and our pathetic "leaders" are still licking their arses.
Originally posted by john124
And onto Cameron's ridiculous policices: The outsourcing of public sector jobs into the private sector is only making the rich corporations even more weathier with no accountability, and so we will get crapper service still funded by tax-payers!
Originally posted by john124
Salaries in the private sector exceed public sector salaries. People's lives are not "waste".
Originally posted by john124
Meanwhile those bonuses at 83% state-owned RBS are looking great!!!
Originally posted by john124
Mussolini had a name for the merger of state of corporate powers : FASCISM!!!
Corporatism + wars = modern day fascism