Mars: Really big Tubes, bridges, pipes or geological anomalies?

I've found these really strange, really big (more than one kilometer) and unusual anomalies on Mars. What are these big structures that cast shadows on the ground? What kind of geological amomalies? Are these only strange geological anomalies or... pipes, bridges, tubes... or worms?



In the same Area...


Anomalies in the Red Box

reply to post by Arken


I do apologize,

but i do not see any bridges, pipes etc. Is it possible for you to maybe point it out in the pic?

Otherwise this looks just like a surface pic of Mars, with craters, dust, etc etc.

Vvv

Unfortunatly like the above post, I don't see any of the things you describe either..
I see some rock formations which I think your talking about, but that's it..

I kind of expected the 'glass tubes' as the subject for your thread.
Far more interesting, not?





Or these lava tubes



And dunes

I assume this is in reference to the so-called Mars Glass Tunnels?

Here's a high res image of the same area.



The low-res black and white images didn't pick up the detail of the terrain so for years there has been debate that they are hollow translucent passageways.

They're really not.

They are either answer A or:
F. None of the Above

Mars indeed has some of the most bizarre surface features I've seen. Keep in mind that Mars has atmosphere, erosion, ice and sand, and used to have liquid water in the distant past.

Here's some good read: en.wikipedia.org...
The tubes are lava tubes. en.wikipedia.org...
Many large areas of Mars have been shaped by glaciers.

reply to post by wildespace


Lava tubes are on the ground.... NOT ABOVE.
And they don't cast shadows...

I can see the shadows under the pipes. S & F! Maybe my Palm Pre has a better screen resolution then the devices others are using, but then again I've seen keen observation quickly "debunked" by people simply saying they can't see it. Psyops!

reply to post by Arken


I don't see anythign above the ground in those pics. To me, it looks like folds in the surface.

reply to post by Arken


i just wanna share some very interesting images, from mars....
s1186.photobucket.com...

you may see my thread on this:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Arken


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e005149f8c94.jpeg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/91a5bf229156.jpeg[/atsimg]
Here are some more..

Are you serious!

Originally posted by Movhisattva
I kind of expected the 'glass tubes' as the subject for your thread.
Far more interesting, not?





Or these lava tubes



And dunes

edit on 1/3/11 by Movhisattva because: (no reason given)

I see what Skipper on marsanomalyresearch.com sees, giant worm casings. I think the author of Dune got his info the way many of them do, from projects. Notice the assymetrical, natural decayed look of some of them. I think he had several comparisons of what he considered real technology and nature.

Mars has less gravity than earth, things would naturally be bigger. The trees that resemble our Banyan trees are much larger.
www.popsci.com...

marsanomalyresearch.com...

Though somewhere he does discuss worms, in one of his articles he is saying these conclusions should not be linked to him, and I think he is going with something else. Interesting article here concerning it, for anyone interested.

marsanomalyresearch.com...

marsanomalyresearch.com...

What I soon discovered is that this evidence wasn't remotely glass tubes or anything like that. One thing that I soon became certain of back then, and all my research in tens of thousands of images since then over the next five years has all reinforced this interpretation, is that the evidence you see above and just about all like it is something on the terrain surface representing life of some kind. Life that spreads and covers downhill surface slopes or grades enabled there by the presence of shallow water flowing down such slopes and then terminating in pooling catch basins at the bottom. At the bottom the ridge forms extends right to the edge of but never extends voluntarily down into the deeper pooling water and only exists in the shallow slope water flow channeling it between the parallel ridges. The only exception to this is when the water level may temporarily rise in the catch basin covering a portion of the ridge forms.
When the depression side slopes are relatively short from the top down to the bottom and the catch system length is long and narrow, then this parallel oriented "ridge form" evidence field is also long and narrow and more uniform in appearance and ridge spacing. When this evidence is seen in this particular set of circumstances, as in my above first image, it tends to visually resemble the long "tubes" interpretation in this distant poor satellite imaging in the quality it has been released to us. The smudge image tampering fields that are typically found around this type of evidence, such as also seen in the first image above, tends to reinforce this impression by smoothing the surrounding background providing the ridges with sharp contrast and also going up between the ridges smoothing out and destroying evidence there giving the ridges a even more pronounced and uniform look.....

…..These factors likely indicate another factor of intentional design, intelligence and therefore active intelligent life as opposed to simple biological life reacting to the presence of this water resource or simple geological activity either for that matter. If only the distancing poor quality imaging and the outright image tampering wasn't so effective in obscuring this evidence, we could then have some better answers..
Also, it should be noted that these formations also initially form consistent with earlier water table and flow levels which may or may not be the same as current lower water levels. So, these ridge forms and their development can tend to follow the water flow levels down the slope as the general underground water table diminishes. This means that the ones at the very top of the slope may no longer represent viable life evidence and may just be very durable forms that last in the terrain long after the higher water level that enabled their development is gone. In such a scenario, the lower level ridge forms are likely the newest and most viable if any shallow flowing water is still present at all at the site or all may be defunct if water is no longer there.

He then went back and changed his original report.
He says that doesnt mean there is no evidence for artifical tubes, and links this report:
www.marsanomalyresearch.com...
and
www.marsanomalyresearch.com...

and the real tubes part 1 and 11:
www.marsanomalyresearch.com...

www.marsanomalyresearch.com...

reply to post by Arken


I think they are layers, but the most noticeable part is the edge, because of the direction of the light.

The triangular area on the top left of the photo looks the same type of feature.

They are geological anomalies, nothing more. I am sure that 90% of 'claimed' alien technology and 'claimed' alien activity on Mars, and, God help us, the Moon, are nothing but tricks of the eye, and we are seeing what we want to see. Sad, I know, but I am not in anyway saying it isn't possible that there are aliens on Mars or the Moon, I am sure there probably are.

Originally posted by Davian
They are geological anomalies, nothing more. I am sure that 90% of 'claimed' alien technology and 'claimed' alien activity on Mars, and, God help us, the Moon, are nothing but tricks of the eye, and we are seeing what we want to see. Sad, I know, but I am not in anyway saying it isn't possible that there are aliens on Mars or the Moon, I am sure there probably are.

So, everything......

Hmmm....

A straight and clear position, a clear opinion, a clear point of view!

here's something to share with...
enjoy
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by wildespace


you skeptics try to discrete everything eh?

The tubes are lava tubes.

www.ebtx.com...
www.greatdreams.com...