It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I haven't heard about those, can you give me a couple of examples?
Originally posted by Topato
In numerous cases that have reported UFOs and even ETs themselves, radiation levels shoot up after they have left the area.
Look at the picture of the dial on that link,and note that it has settings of .5, 5, 50, 500, and presumably 5000 and a higher number where we can see the tick marks but no not the scale number.
The highest reading mentioned on the tape is “seven tenths”, i.e. 0.07 mR/h; this was a ‘spike’ obtained briefly at the centre of the site, not a steady level. In his memo, Halt reports a peak figure of 0.1 but we do not know where that was obtained, or whether it was just a rough value recalled from memory. The figure of 0.07 mentioned on the tape is only twice the general reading. Such a random jump could easily have been caused by natural sources, or even an accidental movement of the meter, and hence is not significant.
On behalf of Frank Close, NRPB contacted the American manufacturers of the AN/PDR-27, who stated that Halt’s peak measurement of 0.1 mR/h was the “bottom reading on the lowest range” of the monitor and was “of little or no significance”. They noted further that these instruments are designed to be used to monitor workplace fields or radiation levels after sizable nuclear incidents and are therefore not suitable for environmental monitoring at background levels. On the basis of this information from the manufacturers, NRPB concluded that using such an instrument to establish a level of 10 times background is not credible.
On the tape we hear them describing the readings at the site as “minor clicks” and “three to four units”, i.e. 0.03 to 0.04 mR/h. They got these readings as they approached the site and then as they checked each of the supposed landing marks. Confirmation that this was only background radiation comes from the fact that the same levels were also recorded over half a mile away from the supposed landing site, after they had crossed two fields beyond the forest (read the transcript here).
The victims were reported to have possibly encountered some kind of ionizing radiation while the UFO was actually there, but there is no evidence I know of that "radiation levels shoot up after they have left the area." in that incident either. In other words, if they were exposed to any radiation, it was only in the presence of the UFO and when the UFO left there was no more radiation. It's more analogous to getting an X-ray taken by a doctor except maybe the dosage was a little too high, if they really did get exposed to radiation. In order to conclude that they did, we would need some information about their health BEFORE the UFO incident, and nobody seems to have that information.
when Schuessler inspected Betty's car in early 1981 and used a geiger counter to check for radioactivity, he found none.
Originally posted by VType
Yep I think its the "exaust" from their tech.
Light and electricty seems too also be at play in lots of descriptions.
Im sure they have "shield" tech that most likely also constantly uses huger powers emitting the Radiate .
The attraction too lightning is some cases shows a Tesla like theory at work as well imo.
Thanks for the link, but this isn't a UFO, it's an alien (supposedly), right?
Originally posted by Topato
www.youtube.com...
In part 34/51 (the one right before the above link) is the actual footage of an "alien" extending its hand and trying to grab the boy. In the following parts they enhance the footage to show its skinny, long arm, etc.
The recording, presented by Maussan as a world exclusive, is of poor quality and was made with cell phone. The pranksters claim that they made it "in order to make a good amount of money from the sale of that material", but are now afraid and undecided about disclosing the truth or maintaining the hoax.
"The events are fake. There is no such alien," said Sergio Valdez Diaz, member of the Centro de Investigacion de Fenomenos Paranormales, a group dedicated to studying such events. ...
The alleged entity's long arm, which touches the young man, is a visual effect. It was said that contact took place when the boy went to fetch the ball, but the ball was on the left and the post was on the right," stated Valdez Diaz, who met with the authors of the prank, all minors.
Do some research on "dark matter" and you'll see any claim that was involved with the "radiation" is surely a hoax. Nobody knows what dark matter is, nor have they measured any radiation from it, only gravitational effects.
According to a written instrument sent to MILENIO by Jaime Maussan, radioactivity was found at the site where three youths recorded a seemingly non-human being on March 20, 2005 using a cell phone.
The text says that astronomer and physicist Jorge Guerrero stated that the discovery was astounding and inexplicable, since there is no reason to justify the existence of radiation in Fraccionamiento del parque. Measurements taken with specialized equipment detected the presence of radiation not deemed hazardous, but merely as "dark matter".
Do some research on "dark matter" and you'll see any claim that was involved with the "radiation" is surely a hoax. Nobody knows what dark matter is
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Nobody knows what dark matter is, nor have they measured any radiation from it, only gravitational effects.
Originally posted by zorgon
I do... turn out the lights in your room and walk into a wall... you will experience dark matter
Yes but while the type of radiation measured with a geiger counter could conceivably stay elevated after a radioactive object left the area, the other types of radiation you mention (like EM radiation) wouldn't linger after the object left which was what the OP referred to:
'Radiation' does not necessarily mean the type detected by a Geiger counter which are used to detect ionizing radiation. Light is radiation as well and if focused can burn some nice holes. So are radio waves and microwaves...
If you take the light example, when the object leaves, the light goes with it, it doesn't "shoot up after they have left the area".
Originally posted by Topato
In numerous cases that have reported UFOs and even ETs themselves, radiation levels shoot up after they have left the area. What's up with that?
There is a vein of uranium ore that runs from George West Texas to almost Texarkana Texas. When determining where to place a mine, the following steps are accomplished: (1) A geologist with a geiger counter flies over the area and finds the highest radiation reading. (2) Drilling trucks are sent out and core samples are drilled to determine the highest concentration of uranium ore. These core samples are drilled in a grid pattern and every core sample is given a tracking number and logged in showing the concentration and amount of uranium present. (3) The open pit mine is then laid out according to these core samples.
When this UFO incident happened, we were about 2 feet away from a layer of hard rock called the "tap rock" that laid directly on top of the uranium ore. The uranium ore varied in depth from 6 to 18 inches and had about the same brown color as low grade coal. Two days after this incident, the tap rock was removed to expose the uranium ore. We were astounded to find that the uranium ore was now a chalky white substance that had NO radioactivity at all! There was a 250 foot diameter circle of this chalky material in the center of the pit.
He also says:
Originally posted by Beavis
We were astounded to find that the uranium ore was now a chalky white substance that had NO radioactivity at all! There was a 250 foot diameter circle of this chalky material in the center of the pit.
1971 UFO oncounter over Texas
Could one infer from his occupation that he probably doesn't have an advanced degree in nuclear physics, or chemistry, or geology, or any field which might actually lend some credibility to his claim about non-radioactive uranium?
I was one of 6 people operating Caterpillar 657B earth movers...
How does he know they were laser beams? They probably weren't because laser beams are invisible until they hit their target, so if they were lasers what he would have seen were spots on the ground where the lasers hit the ground...the beams themselves are typically invisible.
Around the perimeter of the craft was hundreds of penlight size light beams that alternated in all colors of the spectrum. Now I know they were laser beams.
(1) A geologist with a geiger counter flies over the area and finds the highest radiation reading. (2) Drilling trucks are sent out and core samples are drilled to determine the highest concentration of uranium ore. These core samples are drilled in a grid pattern and every core sample is given a tracking number and logged in showing the concentration and amount of uranium present(3) The open pit mine is then laid out according to these core samples.
Outside of the circle, the uranium ore was still as potent as before the incident. Core samples don't lie. This chalky material was uranium before this incident
That happens at the surface.
Originally posted by Beavis
(1) A geologist with a geiger counter flies over the area and finds the highest radiation reading. (2) Drilling trucks are sent out and core samples are drilled to determine the highest concentration of uranium ore. These core samples are drilled in a grid pattern and every core sample is given a tracking number and logged in showing the concentration and amount of uranium present(3) The open pit mine is then laid out according to these core samples.
I was one of 6 people operating Caterpillar 657B earth movers. We were down to about 210 feet deep when this incident happened.
When this UFO incident happened, we were about 2 feet away from a layer of hard rock called the "tap rock" that laid directly on top of the uranium ore. The uranium ore varied in depth from 6 to 18 inches and had about the same brown color as low grade coal. Two days after this incident, the tap rock was removed to expose the uranium ore. We were astounded to find that the uranium ore was now a chalky white substance that had NO radioactivity at all! There was a 250 foot diameter circle of this chalky material in the center of the pit.