It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Researcher who issued challenge demanding UFO proof shocks audience, lecturer, when he presents personal evidence Billy Meier UFO case authentic; hid information for year to avoid publicity for person trying to sabotage and attack Meier case
Playa Del Rey, CA (PRWEB) February 7, 2011
Media representative, Michael Horn, who had set the stage for a momentous announcement by publicly demanding proof of UFO related claims made by researcher, Stephen Bassett, unexpectedly turned the tables when he himself presented what may be the best new evidence of extraterrestrial contact - and then offered it to his former opponent. The event took place, Friday night, at the Flying Saucers Cafe in the Santa Monica area of Los Angeles.
After reading article thrice, I still don't get it.
How does he proves undeniable presence of ETs ?
Originally posted by greenfox83
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
I dont see where he is revealing anything of interest. Only the feud between him another guy is really mentioned. Where can I find the actual pree release of the discussion on Feb.5th?
Originally posted by Versa
reply to post by Namaste1001
No I don't speak for ATS I speak for myself and as me I have made my mind up concerning the Billy Meier case. The theory goes 'Most of his pictures are ridiculous but that doesn't mean that all of them are and he has one arm so he is incapable of being a hoaxer' Well I'm sorry but the whole Billy Meiers case is laughable if you have half a brain.
Originally posted by Unthought Known
Who wrote that article? I ask because it is seemingly on Yahoo yet it is one of the worst written articles I have ever read on a national news website.
Originally posted by Seekeye2
Originally posted by Versa
reply to post by Namaste1001
No I don't speak for ATS I speak for myself and as me I have made my mind up concerning the Billy Meier case. The theory goes 'Most of his pictures are ridiculous but that doesn't mean that all of them are and he has one arm so he is incapable of being a hoaxer' Well I'm sorry but the whole Billy Meiers case is laughable if you have half a brain.
Serious Question: Why are you here?