It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'll release more about the specifics of Charles' information over the coming weeks. The only reason I'm not presenting it all at once is that there's a huge amount of it: there are many places to drill down into. These include:
* The demonization/ criminalization of the alternative media.
* The plan to create a false flag event to present the ETs as dangerous enemies.
* The plan to reduce the world's population through the control and distribution of food.
* Planet X and dangerous solar activity (both are real - but are not show-stopping threats).
* The ET project to create and optimize a new genome - which is the human race on this planet.
* This is the first time in the history of the human race that we have got our hands on ET technology - which was never part of the plan. There were no accidental UFO crashes: all the craft were shot down - at first by a 'lucky hit', and thereafter deliberately.
* The legacy of the controlling group, and why they feel this is their responsibility.
* The way the controlling group functions, and considers its role: some of their codes, protocols, and 'rules'.
An important note: this group is NOT the Illuminati. It's a Council of the 33 most senior members (defined in a particular way) of each of the 33 bloodline families on the 'inside'. The controlling group does not have a formal name.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by drkid
I'm still watching the video to gleam possible insights, but the guy is obviously still doing "his job" whatever that may truly be. He's giving MANY tells to being dishonest nearly every minute of the video. If you can't see this, I think you're going to have a difficult time in the world of conspiracies. Watch how when pressed to give information that he's uncomfortable with, he switches the subject, starts using hand gestures, and changes his speech in tempo and tone. These are all obvious tells. He's also using another clever deceiving technique, which is to build a story in mind while buying time by repeating the question or going off on a meaningless tangent for a few. It works on most people, but I recall being a hellova mischievous youth, and employed these skills, so it's there quite plain and clear from my view.
Originally posted by drkid
I see where you are coming from, however i believe many of us, by human nature have such high expectations that we fall victims of the true colors of reality and we are picked apart by our own disappointment.
Originally posted by drkid
Sure, this man might be who is says he is, might not be. However, since we are not him, since we cannot go into his mind from our desk's we can only assume he knows what he is talking about.
Originally posted by drkid
Keep in mind, he has already made friends will Bill Ryan and they have had a friendship for the past 6 months. It is safe to say, if he presented a guard, it was fairly lowered by the time this interview took place. I insist on staying away from discrediting someone because of my own personal disappointments towards the information they are choosing to shed light upon. Also, in the world of conspiracies... everyone is a liar, trust no one but your own tool of judgment, and even that gets a little rusty from time to time.
Originally posted by unityemissions
The only other thing I can say is everything he mentioned has already been revealed to anyone who's paying attention.
There is nothing new presented here at all.
So what was the point in any of this?
Why?
Is this one big game to keep CTers going in circles, and entertained rather than taking action?
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by drkid
I see where you are coming from, however i believe many of us, by human nature have such high expectations that we fall victims of the true colors of reality and we are picked apart by our own disappointment.
My disappointment is that he has failed to display any moral character whatsoever. It's not a slight blip, it's a huge gash that bleeds profusely.
Originally posted by drkid
Sure, this man might be who is says he is, might not be. However, since we are not him, since we cannot go into his mind from our desk's we can only assume he knows what he is talking about.
This is rubbish, so please don't speak for me. You don't rule me, and have no authority to attempt and impose a reality on how my psyche operates. Using your illogical stance, nothing can every be known of anyone, and yet we should assume everyone knows what they're talking about? There are things which provide insights into other peoples situations and intentions. Empathy, instinct, intuition, and good old critical thinking skills prove that things can be known about other people.
Originally posted by drkid
Keep in mind, he has already made friends will Bill Ryan and they have had a friendship for the past 6 months. It is safe to say, if he presented a guard, it was fairly lowered by the time this interview took place. I insist on staying away from discrediting someone because of my own personal disappointments towards the information they are choosing to shed light upon. Also, in the world of conspiracies... everyone is a liar, trust no one but your own tool of judgment, and even that gets a little rusty from time to time.
I don't assume nearly as much as you do here. Perhaps they have become friends, perhaps they are both liars. I haven't a clue. It's obvious that the two are playing a psychological war game throughout the entire discussion. Is this one big game to keep CTers going in circles, and entertained rather than taking action? I just don't know much of anything about these two characters besides one of them is obviously attempting to fool people, and the other may just be an unwitting pawn of a game. If everyone's a liar, than nobody can be trusted. That IS paranoia.
The only other thing I can say is everything he mentioned has already been revealed to anyone who's paying attention. There is nothing new presented here at all. So what was the point in any of this? Why? How did he crush these people like he said he wanted to? There's too many conflicts from what he says of intent, and what the actual intent could logically be.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by drkid
I think the world-population problem is rubbish. I liken it to Gore's global warming!
The problem is the concentration of a lot of people in small areas.
And if Monsanto is taking over the food source then surely they'll be able to feed all their people, no?
A little trivia: The world population can fit in the state of Texas and still have room to move!
So who are we to say what's enough? What's not? What's too cold? What's too hot? etc?
I loved their (Bill and his guest) suggestion. Stop watching TV/Internet, reading or talking to anyone for 14 days. We'd be amazed at how influential the outside world has truly been on our minds.