Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

reply to post by EFGuy


i can't believe it this thread have so much popularity
Seems the truth is hurting someone hard

Originally posted by backinblack
Personally I think Boon was kidnapped and replaced with a reptilian,
but that just means I now have to debate with a lizard..

lmao, a sense of humor is always good.
It keeps us from going over the edge
Thanks for it

and yes everybody is allowed to change their mind
including me.

Originally posted by sakokrap
There's some good cliches similar to: "know a man by his fruits," and in this regard I confess I like what Assange is doing

finally, a post worthy of discussion

Just what is he doing ????
Do we really know???
All we know is what we are spoon fed
by the MSM. They have lied before.
Why not now ????

I'm getting flashbacks from 9/11 here
when ALL the news networks started
blurting out Osama Bin Laden's name
within 2 hrs of the attacks.

Mass propaganda PR campaign
comes right straight out of the
clandestine playbook.

Originally posted by ParkerCramer
his entire reasoning for this OP is based on a lie, as far as I can tell................

absolutely wrong !!!!

The OP is based upon the financial and legal ties
between Julian Assange/Wikileaks and George Soros.

That has already been established by multiple sources
other than just Glenn Beck.

reply to post by JohnySeagull


It could very well be an organization that is out to free humanity from the control, and bs, of all the governments around the world. Soro's , The Open Society Foundation" appears to be trying to help. This could very well be a cover up, but we always seem to gravitate to negativity.
Maybe, just maybe, they are out for what they think is good.

Originally posted by CrazyChinchilla
Everyone who says someone else is NWO, that person is NWO, trying to make other people look NWO to slander their name and make the conspiracy theorists go against them.

well I guess that post is directed at me
since I am the OP.

If you think a guy that has $23.00 in his bank account
is NWO. Then you are sadly mistaken.

Speaking of, I gotta take $20.00 of that out before
the Dec. 7 bank run.

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by CrazyChinchilla

 

So, you as a trusting person just take Wikileaks word for it that they need to have complete secrecy about all of the funding they receive becasue they are "the good guys"?

burntheships brings up a valid point here
and one that was confirmed by John Young
a former wikileaks employee.

John claimed that he left because of their
original funding goal of $5 Million dollars.

Now what in the world could cost that
much for a whistleblower site when John Young's
cryptome site does it for about $100.00 a month
hosting ???

Where is THAT money going ????
And WHAT is it used for ????
AND .....
IT'S A SECRET !!!!

I can def take a big guess as to where it's going.
Paid informants in the clandestime services
of multiple countries. That does NOT come cheap.

reply to post by EFGuy


Did anyone notice that Michael Moore has contributed to Manning's defense. Why isn't Fox going after him?

Originally posted by JohnySeagull
Wikileaks is not making these cables up.
They are real. They exsisted. They are showing them to the public.
Are you afraid of the truth?
For the last time this is the TRUTH. Its staring you in the face and you still reject it. You have been distracted.You just want to vent your anger at somebody and BLoody fox news has convinced you to vent it at the messanger.
wake up man.

another worthy post to respond to

I am ALL for truth, don't get me wrong.
But in this case, it is a half truth and
for an agenda.

Yes, the documents released are real.
However, in what order they are released
and who they target and who finances the
operation are the leading indicators that
there is an agenda to the leaked madness.

Yes, I want to see my country back to a
great republic as it once was. But I'm not
gonna sit around blindly and accept it's transition
from one tyrannical regime to an even worse one
called a NWO. That's not progress at all.
And you can look at who is financing this
operation to see there is NWO written
all over it. Soros has said it himself
in interviews with him already posted
in this thread.

So anybody who accepts the wikileaks
agenda is basically opening up themselves
to slavery from the NWO financiers.

Originally posted by whatevername
I approve for anyone to bring us transparency because I think it helps fight corruption.
In order to solve the problem we must know everything about it and these guys are informing us.
So that is a good thing.

And that is the very thing the NWO is using
against us. Is our desire to have the truth
at ANY cost !!!

It's laid out on the table for u to sift through
and scrutinize, meanwhile the door locks
behind you in the prison cell.

The truth is NOT worth the cost of slavery.
And that is the exchange getting ready
to take place.

Originally posted by harryhaller
I couldn't agree more with your sentiments, BUT selective truth is lying too.

excellent post there Harry
star 4 u

giving us the truth in the releases but hiding
all the rest is selective truth and Harry is
correct. They are still lying.

Originally posted by EFGuy

Manning's attorney is David E. Coombs
www.bradleymanning.org...

LOL !

ur joking right ???
the article posted is from Sept.
It is now December and can
a person not have 2 attorneys.
The article didn't say he was
Manning's ONLY attorney.

This could get interesting. Apparently Wikileaks has some information on a subject ATSers might find interesting. Wikileaks has some UFO files!

www.msnbc.msn.com...

Originally posted by FuzzyNutzs
This could get interesting. Apparently Wikileaks has some information on a subject ATSers might find interesting. Wikileaks has some UFO files!

www.msnbc.msn.com...

from ur link

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said on Friday that there were some references to UFOs in "yet-to-be-published" confidential files obtained from the U.S. government.

there is a huge difference between

references

and

disclosure

I only went back a few pages, so if this has been covered I beg your Saintly forgiveness.

1) The timing of these releases nearly silenced the findings of the concerning the DOJ and there selective civil rights enforcement (Black Panthers). Read cover for Obama.

2) Obama has come through this unscathed, while the person that seems to be taking the most heat in this country is Clinton. Hillary is Obamas main obstacle to the Dem. nomination in 2012 and there is no love between the two.

3) Soros only gets involved where there is means to the end.

4) If one believes in the "insider" series by Newflavor, is this part of the shakeup? If so it was known.

reply to post by nocents

great points u bring up

and it confirms my posts where
I say WHAT and WHEN is disclosed
if off the most value.

star 4 u

Originally posted by FuzzyNutzs
This could get interesting. Apparently Wikileaks has some information on a subject ATSers might find interesting. Wikileaks has some UFO files!

www.msnbc.msn.com...

I have no idea what a death treat is.

This JUST come over the news 740 ktrh am Houston. Hillary Clinton is Quoted as saying this is the last public office she will hold.

Mission accomplished???!!!

Well, OP, you have even more evidence that George Soros is behind all of this just by reading what wikileaks plans to leak next .... confidential bank records.

Hmmmm ... so that is how George Soros is able to manipulate economies ..... he steals their private information.

he wouldn't have been charged for this type of behaviour in the past would he?

Originally posted by nocents
This JUST come over the news 740 ktrh am Houston. Hillary Clinton is Quoted as saying this is the last public office she will hold.

Mission accomplished???!!!

You beat me to it. I am not quite jaw dropped, but this is rather interesting develpments.
Consider this, just days ago that Assange, with (Ahem) Time Magazine, and Times Editors help
told Hillary she should resign.
www.time.com...

Now, that is so suspect initself. To my knowledge, she is the only person he has ever targeted like that.
Of all of the big bad men out there in Office, he has never suggested anyone else resign.

Huge red flag.