It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KrypticCriminal
reply to post by sparrowstail
There is actually clear footage out there its just extremly hard to find and even the clearest one are still open for interpratation. I think you've been looking at youtube too long. I ve noticed that when i upload videos to youtube it deminishes the quality. I thought videos you put up yourself for your own channel would be better but i was wrong.
As for UFO's deliberatly making videos grainy by choosing times and places its hard to film. Im not so sure. I think its just the quality of low to mid price range cameras when it comes to filming objects that small at a distance.
Originally posted by sparrowstail
Perhaps good footage is not possible because they won't allow it.
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
When strange craft were on the ground or low level flight no one
had a camera.
Except for the Belgium triangle.
Ever since the early operation of these ship the visibility and
photo evidence were evaluated and perhaps deemed no problem
from being identified.
Such craft had the ability of knock out the electronics of radar
on B-17s invading Germany and used to stop bombing runs.
So their operation seems free to go anywhere except near
radar stations and will not be identified.
One theory has so much electricity surrounding the ship that
it generated the light surrounding the craft that makes photos
fuzzy.
Guess thats true.
Originally posted by CosmicEgg
Well, imagine that they aren't subject to our "known" laws of physics. They could produce any number of "irregularities" as a result. We're only now figuring out that what we "know" is actually wrong -- and it's only in the beginning of that understanding. It's just not widely known yet, or rather, widely admitted.
This is another reason that "scientific rigor" is so absurd. Pff. We're most likely missing the whole thing simply because our observational skills are so limited, and our "science" narrows it still further.