It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
TPTB must be buying Whitewash wholesale at the rate they use it.
Originally posted by stirling
I have been waiting for this particular thing to hit the fan for some time...
many of these bundles mortgages were sold out of country....
the foriegn buyers of these bundles cannot prove ownership of individual properties to forclose i believe....
So if deutsch bank has your particular mortgage bundle it cannot show title...and thus cant take the property p
The mortgage mess gets more complicated every day. Here are a sampling of stories that shows how.
Originally posted by win 52
reply to post by Flighty
That is how they crippled China and got back a whack of money we sent over there for goods. Now China wants to get even with the USA for stealing the money they re-invested in the US. ...Fanny Mac, etc....
China has the power now. The USA was trying to put them in their place. The thing is that China has a large sum of USD still and they will not be as easily marked as they were then. The whole economic world is giving power to China with their devalued Yen, buying cheaper goods and selling them at inflated prices to feed the market system.
All of this so certain people can keep their cushy, cake eating lives.
Originally posted by dawnstar
let's see, only a little computer data base knows for sure who owns any particular piece of any mortgage.....MAYBE....maybe even the data base doesn't know either, who knows...
umm.....for some reason, I keep getting this sick feeling that this data base might not have long to live???
has any of the investigators got a court order for a data dump...
I mean, if that goes....by some weird accident....
no evidence, to trail, nothing!
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by thegoodearth
Maybe not.
I do find this interesting...very. Chicago Cook County Sherriff is refusing to follow through on evcitions now, untill they are proven legal. Wow, talk about taking the law into your own hands.
Now, this is what we need all over America. Rise up against the tide of crooked Bankstas!
www.abovetopsecret.com...#
The sheriff for Cook County, Illinois, which includes the city of Chicago, said on Tuesday he will not enforce foreclosure evictions for Bank of America Corp, JPMorgan Chase and Co. and GMAC Mortgage/Ally Financial until they prove those foreclosures were handled "properly and legally."
this type of activity will stop the banksters faster than any type of investigation headed by them (ha). Hopefully more people in the system are still good hearted and have a conscience, they'll be the ones to shut this monster down. We all need to do our part.
Here is the irony...
As they go house to house to confiscate guns, Republicans will have sold out to the communists. Aren't they Pro guns,pro NRA? Yet the troops knocking at our doors half of them will be Republican minded. And they sold out to the communists. Doing the very thing they preech they would never do....
Think about that for a sec.
...the leaked agenda of this year meeting on the corbett reportt
1. Will the Euro Survive?
2. Development in Europe: Europe's Exit Strategy...On Hold?
3. Do We Have Institutions to Deal With the World Economy?
4. Greece: Lessons and Forward-looking Strategies
5. NATO and Afghanistan: The Practical Agenda for the Alliance
6. Iran and Russia: Economic and Financial Threats to the Alliance
7. The Consequences of War Against Terrorism
8. The Influence of Domestic Issues on American Foreign Policy
9.The Outlook for Japan's Economy
10. The Future of the U.S. Dollar
On June 1, 2010, Estulin will make history, being the first investigative journalist in the world to give an address on the Bilderberg Group in the European Parliament in Brussels on special request from Europe´s most-voted politician – Mario Borghezio.
The Bilderbergers decide jointly on the best way to deal with the resources of the planet, and exert control over energy and money supplies, reported Estulin. The structure of the group is not pyramidal with one person at the top-- it is "oval" with three groups of 13 people deciding the particular issues and participants in a given year, he added.
Ultimately, the Bilderbergers seek to destroy the US and world economies, so they can consolidate power, said Estulin, who advised people to take their investments out of banks and corporations and put their money in one's local economies. Based on his study of the group, he has concluded that a war with Iran is "off the table," oil will rise to $120 - $130 a barrel and Putin will not be "dislodged" from Russia.
geraldcelentechannel.blogspot.com...
The 58th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Sitges, Spain 3 - 6 June 2010. The Conference will deal mainly with
Financial Reform,
Security,
Cyber Technology,
Energy,
Pakistan,
Afghanistan,
World Food Problem,
Global Cooling,
Social Networking,
Medical Science,
EU-US relations.
Approximately 130 participants will attend of whom about two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America. About one-third is from government and politics, and two-thirds are from finance, industry, labor, education, and communications.'
www.stopbilderberg.org...
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to post by burntheships
Our Redemption Drawith Nigh.. is how i see this Foreclosuregate...
.......Bank of America will be forced to accept the original mortgage paper from the major buyers,
the NY Fed and JP Morgan toname just two major holders of the toxic mortgage paper.
Bank of America, will prepare new mortgage paper to establish a legal chain of ownership,
but the old sales price of the property will not be acceptable to the current home owner-residents,
the underwater owners living in the home will not sign the restructured mortgage paper unless
a severly reduced mortgage balance is reflected in the contract...
lets say a $300k home purchased in 2006, (but with a faulty deed/title/mortgage lien)
is presently, in 2010 valued at $225k---and expected to lose another $50k of value in this crisis,
the home buyer being in the driver's seat, will demand the outstanding price of the mortgage
to be only $175k due on the house...or else the residence owner will just squat on the property
that has no clear owner and the squatter cannot be evicted because of the foreclosuregate fraud.
I hope beyone all hope that this is the outcome. If not....and we get another bait and switch.... like your other scenario...
that is unless the FED & Treasury and the Courts...decide to support the Wall Street/ Banker
fraudsters & the support groups like Ratings Agencies, Insurers, Title search Lawyers, Appraisers...
instead of 'We The People' on Main Street USA
Now that is going to be the last straw. And actually, there is a bill in the works, something about Notarys, and some load of bandini....have you heard about that?
This client’s lawyer, another foreclosure specialist, was equally strident. He simply stated that this massive scandal would “fundamentally destabilize” the entire U.S. real estate market. Pines interjected again.
“This is not only residential, this is commercial.” In that respect, what Pines meant is that we are about to see the same scenario play-out in the multi-trillion dollar U.S. commercial real estate market. At this point he came out with his real “bombshell”: “Nobody in this country knows for sure who owns any real estate.”
He qualified that remark very slightly, by stating that anyone who owned their property free-and-clear before mortgage securitization started in the 1980’s was likely in the clear. Roughly speaking, this would probably comprise no more than 10 – 20% of the U.S. real estate market.
Note, however, that it is not necessary for 80 – 90% of all property titles in the U.S. to be defective, or even possibly defective. Even if only 10 – 20% were defective (still an astronomical number), that this is more than enough to permanently depress real estate prices in the U.S.
Ask a rational buyer whether he would like to spend $200,000 buying a home in Canada – and actually own it, for sure; or ask that same buyer if he would rather spend $200,000 for a home in the U.S., and perhaps “own” it, what will that rational buyer do? The buyer will either simply completely reject the U.S. market – without consideration – due to the lack of legal certainty, or, the buyer would heavily discount his offer for the U.S. home, to reflect living with permanent risk. How much less is a home worth if you can never be sure you really “own” it? Is it 25%? 50%? 75%?
While the callous attitude of many Americans (bank shareholders?) to the plights of their fellow homeowners is nothing less than despicable, the stupidity of these people in wanting their government to simply wallpaper over this fraud is truly mind-boggling. Clearly, given the choice of one or two more years of housing-sector devastation (the time necessary to properly fix a problem of this magnitude), or the choice of large, permanent discounts on all U.S. real estate, there is no choice here for any mentally competent adult.
Of course, Wall Street has done much more than throw into chaos the U.S. housing market and the entire U.S. mortgage-securitization market. It has also destroyed the entire U.S. state and municipal pension system. Thanks to decades of corruption, where banker-lobbyists gave pension fund administrators fat kick-backs – in exchange for buying what they were told to buy, the U.S. pension system was already underfunded by trillions of dollars.
Now, thanks to the latest, biggest chapter of Wall Street fraud, somewhere around $1 trillion of mortgage-backed scam-products held by these pension funds have little if any worth. The only possible means for many of these pension funds to ever come close to solvency is to sue Wall Street banks, for all of the fraudulent banker-paper sold to them (plus damages).
Note that there are $10’s of trillions in “credit default swaps” (held by Wall Street banks) which back these fraud-products – at extreme leverage. We caught a glimpse of how leveraged this market is in a bankster-versus-bankster lawsuit, between Morgan Stanley and Citigroup. When Citigroup sought to collect on a CDS contract it had with Morgan Stanley, even after liquidating the so-called “collateral” which backed the contract, Morgan Stanley was faced with a pay-out at approximately 300:1. Does anyone want to loan Wall Street banks $300 trillion, or so?
No “terrorist”, or group of terrorists, or army of terrorists could ever equal the economic harm inflicted on the U.S. by the Wall Street psychopaths. They have destroyed their businesses. They have destroyed their sector. They have destroyed the U.S. pension system. And, as of this moment, there is every reason to believe they have destroyed the entire U.S. real estate market.
The $10’s of trillions in losses which they are facing (a very conservative estimate) are more than enough to vaporize this entire crime syndicate – even after the $10+ trillions in hand-outs/loans/guarantees which they have already extorted from the U.S. government. The countless trillions of dollars in legal damages which will be awarded against them in at least a decade of endless litigation is (separately) also more than enough to vaporize them.
Yet despite the greatest white-collar crime wave in the history of our species, not one senior executive of a Wall Street fraud-factory has even been charged with a crime – let alone convicted. This grim statistic leads us to conclude that there is yet one more American “casualty” in Wall Street’s crime-wave: the Rule of Law, itself.
Many (including myself) argue that the U.S. has committed itself to becoming a “Third World” economy. It already has a Third World legal system (and a Third World government).
www.bullionbullscanada.com...:foreclosure-fraud-fall-out&catid=47:us-commentary&Itemid=132
U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo & Co. lost a foreclosure case in Massachusetts’s highest court that will guide lower courts in that state and may influence others in the clash between bank practices and state real-estate law. The ruling drove down bank stocks.
The state Supreme Judicial Court today upheld a judge’s decision saying two foreclosures were invalid because the banks didn’t prove they owned the mortgages, which he said were transferred into two mortgage-backed trusts without the recipients’ being named.
Joshua Rosner, an analyst at the New York-based research firm Graham Fisher & Co., called the decision “a landmark ruling” showing that at least in Massachusetts a mortgage “must name the assignee to be valid.”