It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Muckster
I touched on some of these issues here...
The pain of the middle classes
If you can be bothered, have a read, it explains my feelings on some parts of this thread. I dont wish to hijack your thread so i shall say no more.
Peace
In upstate New York, a bitter strike between Mott’s Apple Juice and its production workers has become the latest battle against the “race to the bottom,” the process of undercutting labor market standards that has plagued American labor for the last three decades...Dr. Pepper Snapple makes no pretense that their bargaining stance is based on economic necessity, on hard times for the company. Corporate sales in 2009 totaled $5.5 billion, with a rather handsome net profit of $555 million. Rather, Dr. Pepper Snapple is demanding concessions simply because it can.
...In his book The Big Squeeze: Tough Times for American Labor, Steve Greenhouse notes that between 1979 and 2007, the real hourly earnings of private sector workers, who make up 80 percent of the American workforce, rose just 1 percent. Over the same time period, the productivity of those same workers rose a remarkable 60 percent. If the wages of the American worker had kept pace with his increased productivity, the average full-time worker would have been earning an average of $58,000 by 2007. Instead, the average wage was $36,000.
The productivity gains, which never found their way into worker salaries, have been pocketed by the American corporate elite: in 1978, the average CEO salary was thirty-five times greater than the average worker salary; in 2007, the average CEO salary had mushroomed to 344 times greater than the average worker salary. [Executive Excess Reports]. “There’s class warfare, all right,” billionaire investor Warren Buffet said in an unguarded moment, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making the war, and we’re winning.”
Originally posted by rnaa
Now ask yourself:
Who exactly is at war with the Public Education System?
Who exactly is at war with the Unions?
Lots of people are screaming that America needs to return to what made America great. What made America great was its strong middle class. Destroying the foundations of the middle class is not going to return America to what made it great. Education and resistance to exploitation will.
Tell me again how 'the wealthy are going to have to cut corners'.
Shilling for robber barons and disguising it as support for the middle class is an ugly, ugly look.
Originally posted by SmokeandShadow
Its simple..there are only service jobs in America now. middle class is all about six people living in a 2 bedroom home or more likely, apartment including older children, grandparents and barely keeping food on the table. That is the new America. Unless you have AT LEAST a bachelors (sorry to all you liberal arts students) you are in for a rough ride. Don't worry, you can join the military though, at least they will pay for you're burial.
Originally posted by rnaa
This thread is a total FAIL.
The concept in the OP is a rehash of the old 'trickle down economics' that has proven to be a total failure and the pursuit of which over the last 30 or 40 years has brought the economy to its knees. We don't need more of that.
The simple undeniable fact is that the two most important factors that provided for the growth of the middle class in America was Unionism and the Public Education System.
The decline in the middle class in America over the last few decades can be exactly correlated to the decline in Unionism and the destruction of the Public Education System.
Now ask yourself:
Who exactly is at war with the Public Education System?
Who exactly is at war with the Unions?
Lots of people are screaming that America needs to return to what made America great. What made America great was its strong middle class. Destroying the foundations of the middle class is not going to return America to what made it great. Education and resistance to exploitation will.
A few grabs from The Corporate Race to the Bottom and the Blindspots of Power Elite Liberalism
In upstate New York, a bitter strike between Mott’s Apple Juice and its production workers has become the latest battle against the “race to the bottom,” the process of undercutting labor market standards that has plagued American labor for the last three decades...Dr. Pepper Snapple makes no pretense that their bargaining stance is based on economic necessity, on hard times for the company. Corporate sales in 2009 totaled $5.5 billion, with a rather handsome net profit of $555 million. Rather, Dr. Pepper Snapple is demanding concessions simply because it can.
...In his book The Big Squeeze: Tough Times for American Labor, Steve Greenhouse notes that between 1979 and 2007, the real hourly earnings of private sector workers, who make up 80 percent of the American workforce, rose just 1 percent. Over the same time period, the productivity of those same workers rose a remarkable 60 percent. If the wages of the American worker had kept pace with his increased productivity, the average full-time worker would have been earning an average of $58,000 by 2007. Instead, the average wage was $36,000.
The productivity gains, which never found their way into worker salaries, have been pocketed by the American corporate elite: in 1978, the average CEO salary was thirty-five times greater than the average worker salary; in 2007, the average CEO salary had mushroomed to 344 times greater than the average worker salary. [Executive Excess Reports]. “There’s class warfare, all right,” billionaire investor Warren Buffet said in an unguarded moment, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making the war, and we’re winning.”
Tell me again how 'the wealthy are going to have to cut corners'.
Shilling for robber barons and disguising it as support for the middle class is an ugly, ugly look.
edit on 6/10/2010 by rnaa because: added link
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by Janky Red
So the oil spill was designed to be mean to the middle class? Did I read that wrong? I believe that there may have been some shenanigans around the BP ordeal, but to claim Obama did it to effect the middle class will require some evidence to back it up.
edit on 6-10-2010 by sheepslayer247 because: spelling and change sentence
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by tigpoppa
Believe me, I am all about a good conspiracy, but I thought the Koreans or China took out the oil rig. link So I don't need more proof, I need proof to begin with.
As far as Reagen, please refer to my above posted link to see the economic data. He was a great speaker and brought many people together, but that in no way proves that his policies were best for the USA. In fact, Obama brought many people together. Should we expect the same from him?
edit on 6-10-2010 by sheepslayer247 because: spellin's
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by tigpoppa
My request still stands. Where is the proof, other than Republican bloggers, that Obama shot a missile at the BP oil rig?
Do you realize that if you read the constitution, the income tax is unconstitutional? Keep in mind that the 16th amendment is garbage and should be abolished. If Reagan was such a constitutional man, why didn't he do so?
If you believe in freedom then you think the Ground zero mosque should be built/allowed, right?
You believe commies and socialists have the right to protest and march for their beliefs right?
You believe that the war in the middle east is completely anti-freedom?
Be very careful what you say...........