It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sambell
reply to post by EnkiCarbone
No, not really, but the question about using dead rabbits as fuel isn't that important to me and pretty off-topic, but thanks for providing me with the info. But when we are on that topic, what does it matter what they do with them if they are dead anyway? The rabbits in Stockholm, it's cute and everything but they are also a problem, obviously. Almost like the rats in any large city. I see them almost everyday and it's nice to see them, but I can understand if the take over large areas and populate like crazy, they become a problem.
is it better to just dump them somewhere or put them to use when they are dead?
I say go for the good use if you gonna get rid of them anyway, they don't even burn them alive.
And you judge an entire country because we happen to slay some rabbits that has become a pest? All over the world, we kill off cows by the millions, rats, cockroaches etc etc. Do you fight for them also or is it just because the rabbits are cute n cuddly?
As they are a pest, they probably get incinerated anyway when they are dead. So why not use them for something good? Their fur isn't good for resale anyway
and the meat can be dangerous to eat.
So should we just let them hump like crazy and take over the entire inner city of Stockholm?
Or should we do as the Australians and introduce targeted viruses and deceases which gonna screw it all up after the rabbits build up an resistance to after a few years anyway?
We all know that hasn't really worked for them in any way.
Originally posted by Cythraul
Is Sweden being destroyed? Yes
Is it deliberate? Yes
Are other Western nations being systematically destroyed from behind the scenes in the same way? Yes
Is mass-immigration a primary tool of this destruction? Yes
How and why? Look up 'Cultural Marxism'. It explains everything.
The immigrants themselves (including Muslims) are pawns in the game. Unfortunately, native and immigrant will come into conflict, all the time not realising who the real enemy is. It's called "divide and conquer".
Interesting points. You're right about the rise of nationalist/romanticist heavy metal. There are new bands coming up all the time in Scandinavia, the UK, Spain, Portugal and particularly in Eastern Europe. I have a bit of insight into the movement and for the most part it is totally unlike the skinhead punk movement of the 80s. It is not mindlessly racist but rather, it heralds back to a bygone era of national prosperity, family cohesion and a love for the natural landscapes these people's ancestors lived within. There's an intelligent and spiritual aspect to it as opposed to a hateful, political one.
There's an intelligent and spiritual aspect to it as opposed to a hateful, political one.
My only thought is this: Did the globalists really think they weren't going to meet some kind of resistance from the youth who are set to inherit this muddled new world? They're lucky it's only being expressed through art and music so far.
Originally posted by Chevalerous
And as I see it - the elite has created this problem and now they are steering us towards the solution, which is the political extreme parties of "Fascism" which are the only political parties who want to stop the mass-immigration.
That's the only logical conclusion I can make of this so far?
Originally posted by Chevalerous
reply to post by Cythraul
Interesting points. You're right about the rise of nationalist/romanticist heavy metal. There are new bands coming up all the time in Scandinavia, the UK, Spain, Portugal and particularly in Eastern Europe. There's an intelligent and spiritual aspect to it as opposed to a hateful, political one.
Yeah exactly! that's my analysis also - mostly anyway!
Maybe because of the Pagan influences with the old Norse Gods as well perhaps?
And you said it beautifully - these are more "normal" people who are longing back for a "bygone era of national prosperity, family cohesion and a love for the natural landscapes these people's ancestors lived within."
My only thought is this: Did the globalists really think they weren't going to meet some kind of resistance from the youth who are set to inherit this muddled new world?
They're lucky it's only being expressed through art and music so far.
The elite and globalists always work with, and are ruling us with 'Hegelian dialectic' to support two opposite sides to get their preferred outcome.
Thesis - Antithesis - Synthesis.
Or
Problem - Reaction - Solution.
And as I said in my former post:
First they have this agenda of mass-immigrations which was mainly implemented by Social Democratics and Centre Governments in Europe through the 1960's to today.
Now the whole political field has changed in Europe towards more neo-liberal right wing Governments.
And many of the extreme far right parties are gaining ground in many countries and even in the European Parliament.
And as I see it - the elite has created this problem and now they are steering us towards the solution, which is the political extreme parties of "Fascism" which are the only political parties who want to stop the mass-immigration.
That's the only logical conclusion I can make of this so far?
But I don't really know mate, but as I see it both in America and here - is that they are clearly implementing and pushing us towards more Fascist Corporatism in our political system.
Maybe this new form of Corporatism/Fascism needs to wipe clean old nationalistic thoughts and concepts of sovereign nationalism and national culture identities on each country's soverign national level before they can implement a new form of Fascist nationalism - but this time on a much bigger scale - on an European level for all of Europe?
It will not be named nationalism though - it will be Europalism 2.0
I mean, that's pretty smart if you think about it!
If I for an example would like to implement a new Fascist system for the whole of Europe, what would the biggest obstacle to that be?
That would actually be the old strong remains which also happens to have to the same character as the old form of Fascism:
1. A strong cultural identity
2. A strong national identity
3. A strong national Sovereignty of each country in Europe.
4. A strong miltary (this has already happened recently in Sweden, the old strong Swedish military is now almost gone - they now wait to build a new one, but this time it will be a part of a regional new EU Military)
I know this may sound weird, but to be able to implement a new Fascistoid system (but this time on an European level for whole of Europe) I must first destroy the old sovereign system with its nationalistic pride and strong cultural identity - FOR EACH COUNTRY!
en.wikipedia.org...
neoliberalism seeks to transfer control of the economy from public to the private sector
Originally posted by Chevalerous
Or something similar to that!
Originally posted by TheLaughingGod
they're really not that hardcore when compared to parties like the EDL and such.
Originally posted by zerbot565
how many swedes do you know that can prove that their lineage goes back
at least 4 generations, lets make it better 6 generations ?
Originally posted by zerbot565
reply to post by TheLaughingGod
how many swedes do you know that can prove that their lineage goes back
at least 4 generations, lets make it better 6 generations ?
Originally posted by Cythraul
Originally posted by TheLaughingGod
they're really not that hardcore when compared to parties like the EDL and such.
"Parties"? I assume you're talking of the English Defence League, who are not and never will be a political party. Furthermore, how are they "hardcore"? They demonstrate, alongside people of all races and religions, against Islamic Fundamentalism.
Originally posted by zerbot565
reply to post by Sambell
sweden had its ups and downs but in all sincerity when a goverment makes a law that banns the sensation of euphoria something is wrong ,
it sais pretty much all an all what the goverment is about ,
Originally posted by EnkiCarbone
I stopped caring about the cowardly Swedes when I found out they were culling wild rabbits and burning them alive as fuel.
Originally posted by zerbot565
for that you have to read up on history, as far as i know sweden was heavily populated by dutch , "belgian" ,finns, german, polish and turkish , you name it they got it but that immigration wave was for work not refugee or sanctuary,
Originally posted by Cythraul
Originally posted by zerbot565
for that you have to read up on history, as far as i know sweden was heavily populated by dutch , "belgian" ,finns, german, polish and turkish , you name it they got it but that immigration wave was for work not refugee or sanctuary,
You can make the same argument for pretty much any country in the world. I'll construe from your answer that you do personally believe that Sweden has no coherent , unique ethnic identity (and don't say "yes, it has a identity which is the result of a mix of other identities" - that's not a coherent, unique identity).