It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Freedom would mean people can network and socialize all they want...but have total control over who can access what information about them...I don't use those stupid websites anyway, problem solved.
It appears to me that social networking sites are not compatible with the idea of freedom and individuality.
Originally posted by The Endtime Warrior
I wonder what would happen if everyone collectively stopped using sites like Facebook. What kind of change would that make for the entire world? Would certain people in positions of power be alarmed? Would they be sweating because now they aren't able to discern who is what? Obviously it would never happen but would we have more tangible interpersonal relationships as a result?
thanks for the critical thinking
Originally posted by crowdedskies
Originally posted by The Endtime Warrior
I wonder what would happen if everyone collectively stopped using sites like Facebook. What kind of change would that make for the entire world? Would certain people in positions of power be alarmed? Would they be sweating because now they aren't able to discern who is what? Obviously it would never happen but would we have more tangible interpersonal relationships as a result?
thanks for the critical thinking
I think I am jumping the gun. The real impact of these social networking sites will be felt at some point in the future. By then you may see a kind of 'common purpose' developing. In fact already Facebook and Bebo have been used to organise very big events.
I suppose the point I am making is that we are seeing the birth of a new world ; a one-world. And that is supposed to be our nightmare !!!
[edit on 8-7-2010 by crowdedskies]
Originally posted by PurpleDog UK
I think that the trend for Social Networking is driven by the sheep / herd mentality of most who do something because everyone else does.
I also think that most who are part of this (future) marketing database oopps sorry social network do not realise that once they are on and all their data and info is on then they are part of the Matrix.
I have chosen NOT to be part of any network, with the exception of this one of course b
regards
PurpleDOG UK
Originally posted by The Endtime Warrior
[
Well nightmare or not, its gonna happen, no question. And they won't force it on us, we're gonna ask for it. Perhaps these sites help condition us to accept a global unification? Surely can't hurt can it??
Originally posted by unityemissions
Well, I'm basically a loner with over a hundred friends on facebook As in, I post real world stuff daily and rarely get responses. Then I look at some of my fb friends mindless one sentence comments and see a ton of likes and comments. So I think that fb mostly just promotes the sheep mentality. People don't think it's cool to talk about real political, economic, or environmental issues. So, I actually wonder sometimes why I'm even on there anymore. I'm well aware that the government and organizations are data mining, but aren't they always? Isn't it pretty much impossible to be totally secure and unhackable? It's the same mentality I have for my vehicle and house. I junk them up and keep valuables mixed in between, and keep the doors unlocked. People don't mess with unlocked, junked up places.
Does anyone agree that the majority are losing their indviduality and becoming a product of the media ? Would you also agree that all this NWO and Globalisation thing is a direct consequence of the need of the masses to 'belong'
Originally posted by unityemissions
Back on topic! :
Does anyone agree that the majority are losing their indviduality and becoming a product of the media ? Would you also agree that all this NWO and Globalisation thing is a direct consequence of the need of the masses to 'belong'
Y
Yes, I agree with your last statement. It seems the world has been engineered to seem ( or actually be!) a scary place, so most people have strong yearnings for the comfort of the hive. It's actually instinctual to be social, and only a few people are schizoid naturally. I do think that it's more of an issue lately. It's very bizarre because you think back to the 1950's and how mass conformed people were then. In the 1960's-70's, you had the hippie movement and creativity/individuality poured out. I feel as if TPTB have used a limited section of our creative/individual potential and blasted that everywhere to make it seem as if people have choices and are being real/original. I think it's all a farce. Or it could just be that we're the ones who are pushing the envelope.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by crowdedskies
A one-world community is happening, and will continue to become more integrated unless civilization collapses in the process. This should actually be welcomed. It's a natural progression for humanity and a necessity for global stability. The problem is government, not community. The problem is a closed system which oppresses and deceives.
Originally posted by ghaleon12
When the internet first started it was more of a tool I think. It was something to "go to" for some things, then go on with life. But now the internet is more lively than life itself for a surprising number of people, and it's something that probably creeps up on people.
Early days of the internet, no one would have cared, they'd turn off the computer. Now people forget that they have that option. Or when people forget that nothing really is "real" over their computer, the people in your immediate surroundings are real. Everyone is different but personally I wouldn't want to keep in contact with most people from high school when 99% of the connection would be done through technology, there's no point.
[edit on 8-7-2010 by ghaleon12]