It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The equivalence principle is one of the more fascinating ideas in modern science. It asserts that gravitational mass and inertial mass are identical. Einstein put it like this: the gravitational force we experience on Earth is identical to the force we would experience were we sitting in a spaceship accelerating at 1g. Newton might have said that the m in F=ma is the same as the ms in F=Gm1m2/r^2.
[...]
All that changes today with the extraordinary work of Endre Kajari at the University of Ulm in Germany and a few buddies. They show how it is possible to create situations in the quantum world in which the effects of inertial and gravitational mass must be different. In fact, they show that these differences can be arbitrarily large.
It turns out that physicists already play with exactly this kind of set up: the so-called atom trampoline, in which a matter wave falls under the influence of gravity but is bounced by an electromagnetic force. They calculate that the energy eigenvalues of the atom are proportional to the (gravitational mass)^2/3 but to the (inertial mass)^-1/3.
If successful, these kinds of investigations will provide an entirely new way of studying the nature of mass and, perhaps more importantly, of investigating the puzzling relationship between general relativity and quantum mechanics.
Originally posted by psychederic
It turns out that physicists already play with exactly this kind of set up: the so-called atom trampoline, in which a matter wave falls under the influence of gravity but is bounced by an electromagnetic force.
Originally posted by psychederic
New Quantum Theory Separates Gravitational and Inertial Mass
The equivalence principle is one of the corner stones of general relativity. Now physicists have used quantum mechanics to show how it fails.
They have done nothing of the kind. If you had understood the research paper, you would have summarized it properly by saying that physicists have used quantum mechanics to provide a way of testing whether the Equivalence Principle fails for objects as small as subatomic particles.
Originally posted by strNick
I wanna aks "Are they that stupid for believing that gravity must exert the same force throughout all scales of masses, when this principle already breaks at subatomic scale, for example??"