It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Last November a police officer shot and killed David Masters, an unarmed motorist, as he sat in the driver’s seat of his car on the side of Richmond Highway, a major thoroughfare in Fairfax County, Virginia. Masters was wanted for allegedly stealing flowers from a planter. He had been given a ticket the day before for running a red light and then evading the police, though in a slow and not particularly dangerous manner.
In January of this year, Fairfax County Commonwealth Attorney Raymond Morrogh announced through a press release that he would not be filing any charges against the officer who shot Masters. The shooting, Morrogh found, was justified due to a “furtive gesture” that suggested Masters had a weapon. The only eyewitness to this gesture was the police officer who pulled the trigger.
There exists dash-camera video of Masters’ shooting. There are also police interviews of other witnesses, and there is the police report itself. But the public and the press are unlikely to see those, or even to learn the officer’s name. That’s because the Fairfax County Police Department—along with the neighboring municipal police departments of Arlington and Alexandria—is among the most secretive, least transparent law enforcement agencies in the country.
Michael Pope, a reporter who covers Northern Virginia for the Connection Newspapers chain and for WAMU-FM, filed a series of open records requests related to the Masters shooting with the Fairfax County Police Department. All were denied. In March, Pope asked Fairfax County Police Public Information Officer Mary Ann Jennings why her department won’t at least release the incident report on Masters’ death, given the concerns that some have raised about the shooting. “Let us hear that concern,” Jennings shot back. “We are not hearing it from anybody except the media, except individual reporters.”
Except the media? That’s exactly who you would expect to file most open records requests. Asked why her department won’t even release the name of the officer who shot Masters, Jennings got more obtuse. “What does the name of an officer give the public in terms of information and disclosure?” Jennings asked. “I’d be curious to know why they want the name of an officer.”
Well, for starters, because he’s a government employee, paid by taxpayers and entrusted with the power to arrest, detain, coerce, and kill. And he recently used the most serious of those powers on an unarmed man. Releasing the name would allow reporters to see if the officer has been involved in other shootings or if there have been prior disciplinary measures or citizen complaints against him. It would allow the media to assess whether the Fairfax County Police Department has done an adequate job of training him in the use of lethal force.
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by highlyoriginal
I'm sorry, maybe I am tired or something, but what's an nt agency?
Originally posted by Redwookieaz
I hate cops....
I'm posting this in 'general conspiracies' since this is not just happening in Virginia - it's happening all over the country.
Media blackouts are what our government is all about, we know this to be a fact.
And yet the police department will not even release the cops name who shot this unarmed man. Not only is it terrible that this happened, but no charges are being filed and yet there have been no files or video released what so ever, so how can you file charges without knowing the information? YOU CAN'T!
The media has a big say in what the masses do and think unfortunately
In this case a person was murdered, and yet no information was available not only to the media but to the public as well. So I believe this is a media blackout as well as a public blackout.
If you wish, try calling/mailing this specific police department and asking for official documents and let me know how that goes.
Originally posted by zaiger
Maybe someone can point it out to me because i really do not know. Where in the constitution are we given the "right" to get the names and videos of officers we want? Or is "rights" in this case being used for the sake of throwing aroud the word?
Originally posted by Redwookieaz
reply to post by highlyoriginal
Thanks for the compliments Yeah I grew up wanting to be a cop and when I was finally old enough to be on the force, and joined, I realized how bad things were.
My friend's dad was a lieutenant with the local gang squad when I was a teen and was the assistant chief before retiring. He had the same perspective and had been a cop for 30+ years. He noticed that while there were always a few bad apples, somewhere around the turn of the last century or so (maybe even before). things changed. They started hiring the types of people they once would weed out. People that were jumpy and violent. People that would get a kick out of the gun and badge. Nasty, bully, adrenaline junkies. They used to really avoid people who they felt had that kind of potential. Not anymore.
I want to add that the crime I saw on the streets didn't hold a candle to the crimes I saw committed by fellow cops! Because when a cop did it and got caught, departments tried to hide it or sweep it under the rug. I saw cops on drugs, covering up negligence, murdering, stealing, sexually abusing people (including multiple pedophiles), etc. And these guys for the most part were never fired!
Cops suck my friends! Take it from a former one!
Edited for S&G
[edit on 2-7-2010 by Redwookieaz]
[edit on 2-7-2010 by Redwookieaz]
For example, records of an internal affairs investigation of an employee would be exempt from disclosure as an administrative investigation conducted pursuant to law (Section 2.2-3706 (G)(3)) and as a record containing information concerning identifiable individuals (Section 2.2-3705.1 (I)).