It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A footnote found in an article written by Gerald K. Haines for the CIA's classified "Studies in Intelligence" confirms the existence of a rumored National Security Agency psychic research program.
Haines writes, "CIA also maintained Intelligence Community coordination with other agencies regarding their work in parapsychology, psychic phenomena, and 'remote viewing' experiments. In general, the Agency took a conservative scientific view of these unconventional scientific issues."
The footnote also mentions possible CIA involvement when extraterrestrial aliens arrive here on Earth: "The CIA reportedly is also a member of an Incident Response Team to investigate UFO landings, if one should occur."
Curiously one of the sources... claimed that some of the operations to remote view foreign intelligence targets had been blocked by "an unknown extraterrestrial source," suggesting the program involves more than psychic perceptions.
Originally posted by draevin
Extremely interesting article, thank you for posting it!
I've always wondered if, since many people claim/believe/whatever that ETI exists on the conscious level and not physical, that there might be some possible interaction with remote viewing and other "psychic" abilities.
This article adds to that, but it also makes me wonder if the other phenomena on the planet, ghosts, poltergeists, demons, angels, astral entities etc etc etc etc, might also be connected on this level.
What if it is all connected this way, and we just haven't connected the right dots?
Oops, here I go again, off on my own. Heh. >.>
First, a target cue or name is formulated and assigned a set of eight random numbers, which serve to keep the process blind and act as a label for administrative purposes. The viewer only receives these numbers and then follows the stages of TRV structure, in order, working for usually forty five minutes in a single session. In the end, the viewer working alone or in concert with a team, almost always has an extremely accurate description of the target, including sketches and often the solution to a problem.
Try as I might, I can never seem to get Gary Bekkum and his overdramatic boy-spy blog out of my life. Just when we, at RU, think that he’ll be content publishing the same old baseless government conspiracy theories over and over – he throws a real doozy out there…a major faux pas manipulation of the truth that simply can’t go unfixed.
As an organization that prides itself upon a “passion for truth,” such an outright abortion of the truth can’t go unanswered. What is this terrible thing? It’s a recent article Gary published at the American Chronicle, a cheesy small online publication that publishes user content from anyone who’s willing to write an article for free for them. In Gary’s recent article titled, “Spy Games Revealed: Spies, Lies and Polygraph Tape,” Gary weaves a very odd web – quoting out-of-context snippets from select email conversations between two friends who happen to be either current or former U.S. Intelligence employees.
Originally posted by ocker
Maybe the People Viewing the targets are saying they are getting blocked.
Worried about the nature of the targets and the implications that could arise from their descriptions from the viewing.
It would be good to hear from someone who participates in this.
Thanks
Ocker
Gary S. Bekkum is an independent 'occasional' rogue journalist & web author, and researcher of material that blurs the distinction between fiction and reality.
www.americanchronicle.com...
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
[Disclaimer - this article is written by Gary Bekkum. Take that for what it's worth ]
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
[Disclaimer - this article is written by Gary Bekkum. Take that for what it's worth ]
If you ever need a caveat like that before reading a writer's work, it should tell you a lot.
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
[Disclaimer - this article is written by Gary Bekkum. Take that for what it's worth ]
If you ever need a caveat like that before reading a writer's work, it should tell you a lot.
It does. It tells you to tread carefully. But I believe in judging everything on its own merits.
A well-known fraudster might hoax 99 UFO photos and take 1 genuine one. If you pre-judge based on the man's reputation, you'll miss out on that real photo.
A well-known fraudster might hoax 99 UFO photos and take 1 genuine one
a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response