posted on May, 27 2010 @ 10:32 AM
EDIT: Okay, it's obvious now the retraction was because of the new video coming to light.
Original comment:
Indeed. Surely this is fairly typical of a hoaxer, just keep continuing your story. It's a bit like celebs who seem to hog the limelight, or more
recently Courtney Cox causing a stir for media attention right before her latest release. "Before" ryhmes with the word I'd choose to describe
that..."stitch".
So what's the possiblity that this person, who it was mentioned in the other new spiral thread (it's all getting confusing!!) is a known hoaxer just
trying to stay in the limelight. Surely if your latest hoax was laid to rest, you'd then choose to find a way to make people talk about it still for
a couple more weeks?
When these things happen hundreds if not thousands of people see the same thing. I mean, there's that case where something was seen streaking
across the sky in America over various states, and it fell into a ravine. When fire chiefs found it, it was an acorn shaped craft about the size of a
small car.
It was seen streaking across the sky by hundreds. The Norway Spiral must have projected out high above the sky to perhaps a few hundred metres, maybe
more - perhaps the trail was kilometres wide.
Both events lasted less than a minute but were seen by hundreds.
The original "Canada spiral" shows what an area that would be seen by hundreds of people, not just one conviniently placed cameraperson. If there is
"something more to it" it just strikes me as wanting people to look at the same videos but "in a different light". ie: "The camera is in such a
great place [for the CGI video shot] because I was told it was going to happen."
So my first impression this is a hoaxer just being a hoaxer and doesn't realise when to shut up. Probably lonely IRL.
[edit on 27-5-2010 by markymint]
[edit on 27-5-2010 by markymint]
[edit on 27-5-2010 by markymint]