It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by AlreadyGone
For the same reasons your friends in high school seemed cool and your dad seemed like a jerk. I assure you that as you mature, your views will too...and you will realize that neither your dad nor God is a jerk.
In fact, you quickly find they weren't as dumb as you thought, and the older you get...the less you are so sure of....LOL
Your dad purposely went out and found bad infulences for you to befriend and surrounded you with "cool" temptations that would lure you away from his protective love and teachings?
My dad did not but I was reading about your god and apparently he did that.
After all that free will BS, your god then went on and allowed his old friend Satan to fill the world with lies, deception, temptation, and confusion. He did not need to let that happen.
He could have just given you free will, good advice (do not pet lions, surface when you run out of air, people cannot fly, etc.) and sent you on your way. That sounds more like my dad.
He loved me, taught me, cared for me, looked out for me, and still allowed me to make my own mistakes. He did not have an old friend sprinkle my life with lies and temptation for apparently no good reason.
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
reply to post by MikeboydUS
Dude, don't mince words with me.
Stewardship is a caretaker position; more custodial than anything else.
But your bible specifically says "dominion", as in "domination; absolute sovereignty" also known as "I can treat you however I want because I own your sorry ass".
You're trying to tone down what the actual words are by putting your own spin on the definitions.
Don't bother.
You'll lose.
And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake.
And if he smite out his manservant's tooth, or his maidservant's tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
Has Satan ever killed anyone?
Wow, people need to pick up a Bible and read.
Satan takes everything from Job and I mean everything, including killing his family. He does it to try to prove a point. He tries to prove that the only reason Job has such great faith in G-d is because G-d had blessed him so much.
Yes, people do need to pick a bible and read it. God accepted the challenge. God gave Satan PERMISSION to bring so much pain to Job. Satan did not do anything to Job without first getting the OK from God. Read the story.
Why did your god accept a challenge from Satan that would bring so much suffering upon and innocent and devoted man? Too counter Satan's point -ie Make a point to Satan.
Who come off as more evil in that story?
John Milton's Paradise Lost and Dante's Inferno have completely brainwashed most people into thinking Satan is something else.
Who on this board is quoting the type of devil illustrated by either fictional author? I think you are confused because Christians are prone to just believe books are some divine truth. Atheists and the like are able to find their way out of the fiction section.
Satan in the Bible is a tyrant.
God in the Bible is a tyrant.
He isn't in hell. He has not fallen.
Again, ditto.
He doesn't like humans. He is compelled to prosecute humanity, which means one thing.
Satan? Are you sure you read any of that bible you are telling others to read? GOD PROSECUTES HUMANITY NOT SATAN. Satan does not hand out judgement, your god does. Satan is not a prosecuter, he is just the jailer. He takes what your god sends him. Knowing what Satan is going to do with them, it hardly resembles anything to the contrary of what you state about Satan to still willingly send them to him. Obviously your god does not like humans or he would not prosecute them and send them off to the worst punishment imaginable.
He wants humanity exterminated.
Then why does he not just rain fire down on cities and kill whole lots of them? Oh, right, your god does that.
Why does he not just flood the planet and kill them all? Oh, right, your god again.
How about getting humans to kill each other over him? Damn, your god have Park Place and Boardwalk, plus that light blue crap on the other side of GO.
Hmmm...what can Satan do to kill humanity (as you say he wants to) that your god has not already done or is doing?
How about get people to believe that they have the right to murder other people over stupid laws like cursing at your father? Damn, your god again.
Maybe you just have God and Satan confused?
This idea of Satan being a rebel is based on assumptions and misconceptions.
Out of curiosity, why does your bible say the rift between God and whatever you call Satan began or what was it about?
Two clear misconceptions, the serpent in Eden and Helel king of Babylon. Neither of them are the same as the Satan of Job.
Funny, I tried to argue the same thing and all I got was the verbal beat-down from a bunch of faux-Christians. Where were you to back me up?
All of this Promethean nonsense is fan fiction.
...and the award for best use of a pretend reference with no real link in a completely empty sentence goes to...
Mikey!!!
Applause applause.
So Satan has started wars, killed, and even committed atrocities. He doesn't care if we kill each other anymore than if maggots murdered one another.
When did your god show any concern over whether or not we kill each other?
I can agree Satan does not care if we kill each other.
Unfortunately, not only does God also not seem to care - he punishes us on top of it for it.
Originally posted by catwhoknows
reply to post by hotpinkurinalmint
Here is why Satan seems cool and God seems like a jerk.
Satan offers the easy options, the roads that humans prefer.
God offers the difficult options, the roads that people can't be bothered to follow.
Do you think we are here to have an easy lazy life? OK, follow Satan.
Or are we here in order to learn, to grow and to help others? OK, follow God.
Or I could rephrase and say, Satan equals evil and God equals good - the names are almost the same - God and good. You do not have to be religious to differentiate between good and evil.
But what about having to atone at some point?
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
Originally posted by catwhoknows
reply to post by GENESIS2012
And God, or good, equals caring about your fellow human beings, animals and the planet.
Wait...did you really just say that?
Are you freakin' kidding me?
god cares about animals?
Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but your bible said (and I know I covered this before, but you probably didn't even read the whole thread before you decided to give your [sarcasm] educated opinion [/sarcasm] ) that man (and it doesn't even say "woman" or "people" or "humans", it says man, so right there, your god is a sexist jerk) has dominion over animals.
In giving man dominion over animals, man has developed factory farming. Millions of animals tortured and murdered every day...living in miserable conditions, treated inhumanely, and dying in indescribable fear and agony...because...your god "cares about animals". Do you even have a freakin' clue?
Honestly...there is insurmountable evidence that none of you think before you speak or even listen to a fraction of the stuff that comes out of your mouths.
People turn around and ask me if I've read the bible, so I can, in turn, ask them if they know about the torture and suffering their post-church Sunday dinner steak came from. You all cast the very stones you accuse other of casting.
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
reply to post by MikeboydUS
By "mince words" I was referring to the "dominion" part of the argument and how it is defined and/or interpreted.
Buuuuuut...about the rest of what you said...
It doesn't matter if you care what the English is...that's what it says.
If they wanted to translate it better, then they should have...well...translate it better.
I'm no bible scholar, because I don't care to be.
I'm no foreign language major either...hell...I barely speak English.
Originally posted by satanictemple
If you're referring to the biblical portrayal of what "God allowed Satan to do," then I pretty much agree with you, but if you actually think that all the excess, needless suffering in the world is due to Satan, I disagree with you.
I believe Yahweh is the salve-driver, the Enlil figure (which predates Yahweh), who desires control over the minds and hearts of humans, and causes suffering, wars, famines, etc to achieve his ends. Satan, the true Lord of humanity, desires our freedom.
Originally posted by satanictemple
Ha-Satan = adversary. It's a title. It's very possible the Satan I worship is not the Satan of Job.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by K J Gunderson
The word "satan" appears numerous times in the Hebrew in the Bible and refers to various figures, including people. So it can refer to any adversary.
Originally posted by catwhoknows
reply to post by GENESIS2012
Because the devil equals everything negative - get everything, grab everything, don't care about people etc etc etc, wage war, blah blah blah.
And God, or good, equals caring about your fellow human beings, animals and the planet.
The first option is easier.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by K J Gunderson
Ive stated before that Satan can't do anything without G-d authorizing it.
That doesn't change his desire to commit such actions.
Its not so much as a challenge. Does a prosecutor challenge a judge when bringing a case before him?
A better question would be why is there such a system of agents and wardens that operate, bringing cases before the Adatel ( the court of G-d)?
The Bible doesn't give a definitive answer, but there are verses that seem to imply some kind of system or structure was set up after either the deluge or the Babel incident.
From your perspective yes, but compared to many human kings and dictators I would say no.
G-d has a more hands off approach than most national leaders. Satan and the other wardens on the other hand directly interfere in human lives. If you are familiar with the Gnostic Archons, Satan's wardens and agents are virtually identical.
Satan prosecutes humanity. G-d judges. Thats very clear in the book of Job. To an extent Satan could also be called an executioner, but I don't know where you get the idea of him being a jailer.
He isn't authorized to do so. I'm sure if given authorization he would do so.
I think you might have them confused. The Gnostics made a mistake like that.
There isn't any rift with them. The rift is between humanity and G-d.
Where was this? I used to have a thread on ATS, where I broke it down verse by verse, word by word about the Serpent and Helel, King of Babylon.
I know its difficult to argue with people who have been brought up on a specific belief structure, even though their holy books contradict what they were taught. They don't like their view of reality disrupted. It confuses them, causing uncertainty and doubt. The biggest issue is that humans don't like to think for themselves. They don't like the responsibility.
I try to not be like that. I examine faiths and philosophies from around the world, searching for archetypes and analogs. There is a syncretic pattern.
I try to go back to the original words and languages to find meaning.
One of the issues that most humans have with any superior being or god and how that being deals with humanity, is that humans think they have some kind of special entitlement or rights.
Do fruit flies in a lab have rights? Does a bacterial culture have rights?
An even better analogy would be does a Sim, from the game, have rights? Should we give rights to virtual beings? Most people would say no, they arn't real. Humans are in a somewhat comparable situation.
Compared to the powers or archetypes that transcend us, we are virtual. Our world is a mere shadow of theirs.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by K J Gunderson
You said his satan couldn't be a different satan. I'm saying it could. It doesn't matter how Christians percieve the issue.
Azazel and Ha-Satan of Job are two different entities. Azazel has been called a satan and so has numerous other angels.
Christian misconceptions don't change that. You and I both know there are Christians who call anything they don't understand "satan", including Allah and Buddha.
But where did it all begin? Pagans From old Egyptian texts we can see that people regarded the Sun as the emblem of the Creator. They called the Sun Ra, and all other gods and goddesses were forms of the Creator. One of these gods was Amen; a secret, hidden and mysterious god named variously Amen, Amon, Amun, Ammon and Amounra. For the first eleven dynasties (c. 3000-1987 B.C.) Amen was just a minor god, but by the 17th dynasty (c. 1500 B.C.) he had been elevated to be the national god of southern Egypt. This position gave Amen the attributes and characteristics of the most ancient gods, and his name became Amen-Ra, that is, a supreme form of God the Creator. By the 18th Dynasty (1539-1295 B.C.) a college had been established to study Amen-Ra and as a focal point for worship.
The Jews settled in Egypt for around 400 years4 from 1847 B.C. and during this sojourn there is no doubt they would have been fully exposed to the worship of Amen-Ra. By the time of their exodus from Egypt in 1447 B.C., the term 'Amen' would certainly be in their language even if it was not their god. It would be a word that had associations with reverence and majesty. This is not difficult to understand. People still talk about Moses, Jesus, Mohammed and Buddha, and often use those names completely out of context as expletives. Amen was seen as a powerful god and the name continued, out of context, as an exclamation or salutation; a classic example of language evolution. From the Jews, the word was adopted by Christians, Muslims and others.