It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
YOU are the reason we are in this predicament.
Originally posted by XyZeR
Criminals carry weapons everywhere...Law abiding citizens don't
For if they did, they would be the same as the criminals.
We call that "respecting the law" ...maybe when you see these figures you'll have a different look on things
Originally posted by doctor j and inmate c5779
I got charged with a class c felony.... However I am still not allowed to vote or own a gun or enter any country worth a crap.
Originally posted by XyZeR
Criminals get guns and carry them everywhere.
But, a law abiding citizen, can't?
We call that right.....being INFRINGED!
Criminals carry weapons everywhere...Law abiding citizens don't
For if they did, they would be the same as the criminals.
We call that "respecting the law"
Logic FTW!
maybe when you see these figures you'll have a different look on things
Since America has the most armed citizens/nation on earth it should in your warped logic be the safest... which it clearly isn't
Country Gun Death Rate per 100,000
Japan 0.07
Singapore 0.24
Taiwan 0.27
Kuwait 0.37
England/ Wales 0.4
Scotland 0.49
Netherlands 0.55
Spain 0.74
Ireland 1.24
Germany 1.44
Italy 2.27
Sweden 2.27
Denmark 2.48
Israel 2.56
New Zealand 2.67
Australia 2.94
Belgium 3.32
Canada 3.95
Norway 4.23
Austria 4.48
Northern Ireland 4.72
France 5.48
Switzerland 6.2
Finland 6.65
USA 13.47
Source: W. Cukier, Firearms Regulation: Canada in the International
Context, Chronic Diseases in Canada, April, 1998 (statistics updated
to reflect most recent figures, January 2001)
www.guncontrol.ca...
How does the bible say it again:
He who lives by the sword..... (replace sword by handgun....)
Originally posted by 23refugee
reply to post by Lilitu
So, any person choosing to excercise a constitutional right is either suicidal or a terrorist. REALLY? REALLY?
Originally posted by 23refugee
The first oppression that should be stopped is the disarming of the citizenry.
Much to the surprise of many, President Obama’s first year in office has not featured a push for new gun control legislation. In fact, not only has he not pushed for new legislation, he has actively resisted calls by gun control groups while signing legislation allowing open and concealed carry in National Parks and Wildlife Refuges as well as allowing firearms on Amtrak trains. In fact, the Brady Campaign is so up upset with President Obama that they rated him an ‘F’ on their annual report card. In a report issued on January 18th of this year, they noted that in just one year, President Obama has "signed into law more repeals of federal gun policies than in President George W. Bush’s eight years in office."
Originally posted by VintageEnvy
I'm glad carrying your gun around town makes you feel safe. I sure as hell wouldn't feel safe with you standing next to me in line somewhere with your gun hanging out. I'm not going to feel better knowing your having dinner in my restaurant and your packing in case some mugger runs in and tries to hold me up.
Your causing more problems then you think it's solving. If I actually saw you rolling around with your gun I would be inclined to call someone and make sure your allowed to have it. I don't feel safe when people around me have guns. People are too flawed to be carrying around something that can do so much damage.
Originally posted by Lilitu
Do you really believe your little pop-guns can prevent tyranny by the government?? I mean - REALLY??? Consider for a moment the awesome irresistible power they could bring to the fight against you. Consider the shock and awe. Consider dead neo-confederates by the millions bulldozed into mass graves because they are too numerous to give a proper burial. Your weapons are nothing. You are as powerless armed as you are disarmed. And while you are doing all that considering, consider that there are better, smarter means of accomplishing ones political aims than resorting to violent suicidal/terroristic behavior.
My statement was an explanation of the original intent of the second amendment, which is still the law, feasible or no.
Originally posted by Lilitu
Originally posted by 23refugee
reply to post by Lilitu
So, any person choosing to excercise a constitutional right is either suicidal or a terrorist. REALLY? REALLY?
I didn't say anything about rights. I was addressing your stated purpose for bearing arms which entails a threat to US national security and sovereignty and is therefore a terroristic threat. At the time the constitution was written an armed citizenry made sense as a final check against tyranny but that is no longer feasible. You simply cannot match the firepower of the US government.
Originally posted by 23refugee
The first oppression that should be stopped is the disarming of the citizenry.
Where are US citizens being disarmed? Who is doing it? Obama? Seems his presidency has been a gift to gun owners.
The Obama Administration Year One: The flight from gun control
Much to the surprise of many, President Obama’s first year in office has not featured a push for new gun control legislation. In fact, not only has he not pushed for new legislation, he has actively resisted calls by gun control groups while signing legislation allowing open and concealed carry in National Parks and Wildlife Refuges as well as allowing firearms on Amtrak trains. In fact, the Brady Campaign is so up upset with President Obama that they rated him an ‘F’ on their annual report card. In a report issued on January 18th of this year, they noted that in just one year, President Obama has "signed into law more repeals of federal gun policies than in President George W. Bush’s eight years in office."
Wake up already!
Originally posted by 23refugee
Accusations of terroristic threatening...
Originally posted by Lilitu
Originally posted by 23refugee
Accusations of terroristic threatening...
The words which you typed, posted and which I quoted are by legal definition a terroristic threat. Intimidation of the government by threat of force of arms is a terroristic threat according to the Federal criminal code 18 U.S.C. §2331.
You failed to answer the questions in the second part of my last post.
Where are US citizens being disarmed? Who is doing it? Show me the documentation if it's not just a paranoid delusion.