It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
"About the only thing which I find I can agree with you is that there was confusion at NORAD on the morning of 9/11."
Trillions of dollars poured into NORAD to defend the country and the best they could come up with was "confusion"? Wow!
"Not entirely surprising in that NORAD had been conditioned for years to look outwards from the continental US and suddenly became aware of mayhem in it's rear."
On the contrary, very surprising considering a well funded and profesionally stocked organization like NORAD had their lunch handed to them by 19 cavemen who couldn't even keep a Cessna in the air.
Originally posted by Alfie1
A totally fallacious argument. Vast sums are spent on law enforcement. Does that ensure that a crazed gunman could never enter your house and murder your family ?
Originally posted by boroboy
reply to post by TopsyTurvyFuture
Hello
I am not sure if you know but when the bombs were exploded on the London underground on July 7th ,there was an "exercise going on that day aswell"same type of scenario .
Hmmmm 2 attacks / 2 training exercises both exercises with the same scenario as what happened
Anyone with an IQ above 10 would look at the WTC 7 video with the top of the building creasing and the speed of the collapse and say "That looks exactly like a demolition".
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by dariousg
However, when a plane crashes, intentional or not, the NTSB is still called in to the accident scene to do their JOB.
Just thought I would point out some of the contradcitions there. The NTSB's job, among other things, is to regulate and monitor the transportation industry. To that end they will investigate accidents and mishaps. 9/11 was not an accident nor a mishap. There was no purpose in "investigating" the crashes as there would be nothing to learn or advise for future correction. The crashes were all purposeful acts of criminals. They may have assisted techinically, as required, the governing investigative agency but that is not their "job".
Originally posted by killer4281
i have met some people and been to places you have never heard of i can tell you this when the CIA or the F.B.I tell you it is top secret they mean that if you open your mouth you will never be heard from again that i can promise you
Originally posted by -Blackout-
I ran upon this website and these theories/facts within this link below. Its some interesting stuff.
www.salem-news.com...
Thoughts?
[edit on 19-4-2010 by -Blackout-]
Originally posted by killer4281
i have met some people and been to places you have never heard of i can tell you this when the CIA or the F.B.I tell you it is top secret they mean that if you open your mouth you will never be heard from again that i can promise you
Originally posted by skeptic_al
Originally posted by -Blackout-
I ran upon this website and these theories/facts within this link below. Its some interesting stuff.
www.salem-news.com...
Thoughts?
[edit on 19-4-2010 by -Blackout-]
How is this another seriously undeniable flaw, this is exactly the same
bull plop that has been peddling now for 9 years.
It's just moved to different web site.
Originally posted by Alfie1
There is nothing unique or miraculous about flimsy documents surviving horrendous air crashes.
this is just unsubstantiated and possibly intentionally misleading garbage.
Originally posted by FewWorldOrder
At least one poster claims that parts from the alleged flights were positively identified by some government agencies.
Looking over the links provided, I do not see this evidence.
Originally posted by 4nsicphd
this is just unsubstantiated and possibly intentionally misleading garbage.
Unless this evidence is presented, that is exactly what this is.