It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
CHARLOTTE - Even by President Obama's loquacious standards, an answer he gave here on health care Friday was a doozy.
Toward the end of a question-and-answer session with workers at an advanced battery technology manufacturer, a woman named Doris stood to ask the president whether it was a "wise decision to add more taxes to us with the health care" package.
"We are over-taxed as it is," Doris said bluntly.
Obama started out feisty. "Well, let's talk about that
He then spent the next 17 minutes and 12 seconds lulling the crowd into a daze. His discursive answer - more than 2,500 words long -- wandered from topic to topic, including commentary on the deficit, pay-as-you-go rules passed by Congress, Congressional Budget Office reports on Medicare waste, COBRA coverage, the Recovery Act and Federal Medical Assistance Percentages
Even Obama seemed to recognize that he had gone on too long. He apologized -- in keeping with the spirit of the moment, not once, but twice. "Boy, that was a long answer. I'm sorry," he said, drawing nervous laughter that sounded somewhat like relief as he wrapped up.
But, he said: "I hope I answered your question."
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by plumranch
Imagine that. He only took 17 minutes to try to explain to an obviously ignorant woman, one of the most complex and poorly-understood facets of our government.
People spend years learning what all that stuff means, and she got it in 17 minutes.
Tragedy is, you know it all went in one ear and out the other, since she probably didn't want an answer anyway.
Imagine that. He only took 17 minutes to try to explain to an obviously ignorant woman, one of the most complex and poorly-understood facets of our government.
Even Obama seemed to recognize that he had gone on too long. He apologized -- in keeping with the spirit of the moment, not once, but twice. "Boy, that was a long answer. I'm sorry," he said, drawing nervous laughter that sounded somewhat like relief as he wrapped up.
But, he said: "I hope I answered your question."
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Good for Obama.
Finally a decent guy who will sit there and explain....
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by plumranch
Imagine that. He only took 17 minutes to try to explain to an obviously ignorant woman, one of the most complex and poorly-understood facets of our government.
People spend years learning what all that stuff means, and she got it in 17 minutes.
Tragedy is, you know it all went in one ear and out the other, since she probably didn't want an answer anyway.
Do you ever feel like that you are a appeaser? I ask because it seems you will cover for every action and blame anyone else other than your guy. It shows weakness and for you to pretend that you have any idea what this woman thinks is pure appeasing arrogance on your part.
To tell you the truth I am getting sick and tired of the shills on ATS that want nothing more than to pick a fight or play the blame game. You rarely make points and when you are cornered attack with simple minded comebacks.
I am wondering if could prove me wrong please explain why she would not want a answer to the very question she asked. What was it exactly that made you think this. I bet you cant answer without making wild assumptions. But by all means please try.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by plumranch
Imagine that. He only took 17 minutes to try to explain to an obviously ignorant woman, one of the most complex and poorly-understood facets of our government.
People spend years learning what all that stuff means, and she got it in 17 minutes.
Tragedy is, you know it all went in one ear and out the other, since she probably didn't want an answer anyway.
Do you ever feel like that you are a appeaser? I ask because it seems you will cover for every action and blame anyone else other than your guy. It shows weakness and for you to pretend that you have any idea what this woman thinks is pure appeasing arrogance on your part.
To tell you the truth I am getting sick and tired of the shills on ATS that want nothing more than to pick a fight or play the blame game. You rarely make points and when you are cornered attack with simple minded comebacks.
Do you ever feel like a hypocrite?
I am wondering if could prove me wrong please explain why she would not want a answer to the very question she asked. What was it exactly that made you think this. I bet you cant answer without making wild assumptions. But by all means please try.
Well, when someone shouts at the man, "Where's your birth certificate?!" do you think they're angling to try to get an answer? No. They're making an accusation and softballing it by putting a question mark at the end.
"More taxes to us, we're overtaxed as it is!" - first, who are "we"? What is her definition of "overtaxed" and how much tax is "just right"? Her question is wholly subjective, odds are it's not actually based in fact (I could be wrong, maybe she actually is in a bracket getting a tax hike. Maybe I'm a Corsican prince.) Her question basically is a vehicle to accuse Obama of "overtaxing us"
If you ever take a break from being a hypocrite, maybe we can discuss the nuances of language in political discourse. It's actually a pretty interesting topic.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by plumranch
Because taxes are boring. Really, what's your point? people wandered off from a boring part at the end of a speech? Oh heavens to betsy, it's Obama's Hindenburg!
I like the guy. I voted for him. And I would do it again. And I'm certain I would nod off or wander out to take a leak if he started taking nearly 20 minutes to explain taxes. He's just not quite that interesting.
Now, if he could get Elizabeth Kucinich to tell me about taxes, I would give the subject the attention it deserves
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by plumranch
Im sorry but where exactly have you been over taxed? Income taxes have been at their lowest since Reagan. Where? I ask.
Its all about throwing everything and anything. If Obama answered the question in under a minute, his ignorant! Didnt explain himself! He takes the time to explain it as best he can and now his taking too long! Nevermind the fact disgruntled conservatives now actually have an opportunity to address Obamas answer word for word, nope, they are unable to!
So they shoot how long he takes. Instead of addressing the bill itself, the bill is 'too long!'. Instead of addressing Obama, his answer is 'too long!'. Instead of countering his policies with relative arguments, 'his using a teleprompter!'. Its absolutely pathetic and it shows you how personal people have it in for this man. At the end of the day you realize how little this has to do with the constitution or policy in general.
The most interesting thing about this is that if you type the exact title of the thread on google, you start seeing a long list of rightwing websites going on about it. This is just the result of the rightwing echochamber here. People are unable to be objective themselves.
[edit on 4-4-2010 by Southern Guardian]