It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They are not real people
Originally posted by truthquest
I plan to publish this research at some point but since its pretty much a waste of my time as this stuff is not used as argument anymore
Originally posted by truthquest
The only thing that seemed especially odd that I did not research was the disparity between the impact time from what was seen on TV and the impact time from what was measured by the earthquake monitoring equipment
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
The no-plane disinfo cult absolutely does still argue the camera angle BS and that the planes were all coming in at different angles, so go ahead and post your findings. It's not like it will change any of their minds anyway.
Originally posted by countercounterculture
I wouldn't give much ear to those who would call me names 'un-patriotic', 'sheeple', 'lunacy fringe', 'cultist' etc...
Originally posted by countercounterculture
reply to post by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
The no-plane disinfo cult absolutely does still argue the camera angle BS and that the planes were all coming in at different angles, so go ahead and post your findings. It's not like it will change any of their minds anyway.
I must disagree with you there.
I think you are using some strange logic there.
I doubt many of the 'no plane dis-info cult' believed the 'no-plane' theory to begin with. They have steered away from the OS and changed their minds many times.
They have changed their minds before, I don't think it would be that hard for them to change their mind again.
Regarding 911, I have changed my mind many times.
I'm sure I can change my mind again.
I believe I can be convinced that the OS is true, or that there were no planes.
However although I expect to have my opinions criticized with argument and evidence, I wouldn't give much ear to those who would call me names 'un-patriotic', 'sheeple', 'lunacy fringe', 'cultist' etc...
I understand you have been bringing valuable evidence to the table to enlighten us all, and for that I salute you, but you should avoid hitting below the belt if you expect your criticism to be taken seriously.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by truthquest
I plan to publish this research at some point but since its pretty much a waste of my time as this stuff is not used as argument anymore
The no-plane disinfo cult absolutely does still argue the camera angle BS and that the planes were all coming in at different angles, so go ahead and post your findings. It's not like it will change any of their minds anyway.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by truthquest
The only thing that seemed especially odd that I did not research was the disparity between the impact time from what was seen on TV and the impact time from what was measured by the earthquake monitoring equipment
I'm not sure what the time difference is. If you know, please post it. But earthquake seismographs register vibrations in the ground. The planes hitting the towers nearly a quarter mile up would not cause significant vibrations on the ground.
Basement explosions, on the other hand, most definitely would.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
The few that created the "no planes at the WTC" and "tv fakery" theories actually create, i.e., manufacture some of their "evidence". These theories have already been found to be disinformation. Those who manufacture or create disinformation are disinfo artists.
It doesn't get much more simpler than that.
Originally posted by stevenwarran2
I disagree strongly with countercountercultural's argument. I could never again believe in the OS. For others to do so means to me that someone has spent some time behind the curtain with the wizard pulling the levers. Those are the only two real categories in life in my view: insiders and outsiders to the control box.
Could I ever believe that no-planes theory is false? I don't think so.
Advocating or advancing theories contending that no planes whatsoever struck the WTC is not permitted, and such threads will be subject to locking, moving to the Fire Pit, or deletion.
"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton
"I don't think my post was off topic in the slightest. When we spoke on the telephone recently you said you had never heard of the Reality Shack forum. There, they have been doing exactly the same type of work that you now are claiming, "is some of the best damning evidence that's been found and presented for ages in 9/11." This is independent of no-planes theory. It is called Vicsim theory. But it is equally as transgressive and upsetting to standard logic and rational thought as is no-planes, so beware. It has eclipsed no-planes as "the most divisive antagonistic theory in 9/11" to use your words. Think about it: the concept is not only have they been misleading our eyes, but they have been misleading our hearts."