It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by boondock-saint
Thats a revolution nowadays?
Originally posted by brainwrek
reply to post by boondock-saint
Ok, lets make it easy on you.
Name a single person who has ever been denied medical care and died as a result.
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
Now, when you say you're using Occam's Razor to see who's sending threats, that's just insulting.
Originally posted by Acid_Burn2009
I am lucky enough to have health care through the military since I am a reservist and even that is $200/month. I also have VA coverage for my disability and it's free as long I go to the VA for service connected issues, otherwise I pay.
Originally posted by brainwrek
Name a single person who has ever been denied medical care and died as a result.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
I hear it on MSNBC and FOX that members of the house who voted for the health care bill are getting death threats. And so it begins, the wrath of the american public is starting, and some of these people are out for blood. They are also feeling threatened by having their picture with a bulls eye target on it, giving them pause to think about what they just did. Many are saying to calm down and do not do anything violent or rash, but I have a feeling that there are those who are going to force a change at the point of a weapon. Right now it is just small incidents, bricks through windows, verbal and email threats, but the more this goes, the more they are going to look at the possiblity of curbing free speech. According the news, they are looking into the threats seriously. And it is extending to the representitives families as well.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
You better read that Declaration again. No where does it advocate violent revolution.
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security
Originally posted by brainwrek
Actually you may want to read that Declaration again.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
No where does it advocate violent revolution.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Your "authority" goes so far as to who you or rather your district or country elect (depending upon office of course).
Wrong again it was to keep the delegations manageable but have the peoples voice. delegates were appointed as spokesman to convey the will of the people who they represented. Not do thier own thing. And they knew if they did anything other then the will of those who appointed them they would be yanked immediately. They also knew they had no authority to vote on anything in the personal lives of people. You need to study history. What you see today is not what they set up in most respects. The people today have no memory of how the free republics operated.
The federal government had no authority in the states or over the people it had 17 enumerated powers period it was mainly for mutual defense. The Constitution does not apply to the men and women on the land it was simply a restriction on the Federal government. i.e. This is what you can do and nothing more, if it's not in there you can't do it!
Originally posted by brainwrek
Could you please post the name of a single person that has "lack of insurance" listed as COD on their death certificate?
Originally posted by brainwrek
Treatment doesnt guarantee survival, and at their ages, most likely it wouldnt have provided much in quality or quantity of life.
They died from cancer, not lack of insurance.
# When government takes away these rights, the governed have just cause to overthrow or separate themselves from that government. The thought that people had a right to overthrow government was indeed revolutionary, although the premise had been stated by philosophers in the past--John Locke, for example. The Declaration contends that although the right to rebel exists, human nature dictates that people will not do so over light and transient causes, choosing rather to suffer than rebel in most cases.
# Great Britain is guilty of attempting to take away the aforementioned God given rights; therefore, the colonists are justified in separating themselves from Great Britain. Jefferson and the committee use deductive reasoning to make their case, stating first the principle and then supplying evidence (in the body of the document).