It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kiwifoot
Hm, I fail to understand the true gist of your post.
I take it you're pro-abortion.
I'm pretty sure you're pro children having homes.
This is where it gets tricky, are you saying that before religious folk get up in arms (over abortion) they should adopt all the kids that need a home?
But how would that affect the ladies wanting to have abortions in the future?
Am I missing something here friend?
I'm not disagreeing, just trying to get some clarification!
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by Trudge
Just because someone might oppose abortion, does not nessasarily mean they would make the best parents, or meet criteria required to be permitted to adopt.
[edit on 3/12/2010 by ladyinwaiting]
Originally posted by Trudge
I was just thinking of this today. Why don't "ALL" religious groups (families) adopt "ALL" children that need adoption? In my opinion, I think it is a womans right to decide if she would like to have an abortion, and religious groups don't believe in abortion, and fight teeth and nail to try and stop abortion. My question is ,why don't "ALL" families who are in religious groups adopt "ALL" children who need a home? Shouldn't "ALL" children have a place to call home? I think that until "ALL" children that need a home have a home, they should stop trying to get rid of abortions. Am I way off here??
Originally posted by Trudge
reply to post by woodwytch
I thank you for your reply to my post woodwytch, and everyone else that has sent a reply, or will send a reply. I enjoy reading everyones thoughts on this matter, and it helps me to better understand this issue.
Thank you.