It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to post by Circle
Some people feel that the Scottish Rite and York Rite are both degree pedaling systems as well, but some feel they are important.
While it may be relevant to himself, he is not necessarily correct.
Originally posted by Circle
That's interesting, I didn't know that the Operatives had made a beachhead in the US. You would think that it would start in a bigger city like New York or one with more political influence like D.C. It's probably because a leading member went to work in Phily. What's the lodge called Senrak?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
From my experience, most seem to focus on the 33rd degree, as if it were the pinnacle of Freemasonry. In reality, the Masonic system of three degrees contains the fundamentals of Masonry. Other Masonic degrees and rites expand upon the first three degrees, but do not replace their original authority.
Originally posted by Circle
How difficult is it for a Mason outside the US to join the College of Rites to get access, to say, the Eygptian Rite or other inactive Orders? It begs the question - are they really inactive or just restricted to a certain privileged few?
Is the M-M International, the official College Of Rites for Masons outside the US?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
But not "within" .. They are Masonic, only Masons can attend said degrees, and Freemasonry acknowledges (most) of them. But they are not "within" Freemasonry, which is, officially, under the UGLE, the Blue Lodge or 3 degrees.
The Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Louisiana is a 3rd degree Mason. Because the head of the Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction, the guy in charge of Scottish Rite Masons in 35 of the United States, happens to be from Louisiana, he falls under the purvey of that state's Grand Master. So a Grand Master, who might not be a 33° Scottish Rite Mason, can, at will, declare that Ron Seale is not a Mason. What does that tell you? That an individual Mason, regardless of affiliation in appendant bodies, answers to no higher Mason than the Grand Master of his jurisdiction who has the authority to recognize said bodies or not as he sees fit, or at the voting of his constituent lodges.
Originally posted by Circle
The 33 Degree Mason in Ancient and Accepted Rite can sit in on the 3rd degree Ceremony of Craft. The Master Mason of Craft, unless he is a 33rd, cannot do the same for the Ancient and Accepted Ceremony. What does that tell you? "Officially" the 3rd is the highest. Draw your own conclusions please.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
The Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Louisiana is a 3rd degree Mason. Because the head of the Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction, the guy in charge of Scottish Rite Masons in 35 of the United States, happens to be from Louisiana, he falls under the purvey of that state's Grand Master. So a Grand Master, who might not be a 33° Scottish Rite Mason, can, at will, declare that Ron Seale is not a Mason. What does that tell you? That an individual Mason, regardless of affiliation in appendant bodies, answers to no higher Mason than the Grand Master of his jurisdiction who has the authority to recognize said bodies or not as he sees fit, or at the voting of his constituent lodges.
Originally posted by Circle
The 33 Degree Mason in Ancient and Accepted Rite can sit in on the 3rd degree Ceremony of Craft. The Master Mason of Craft, unless he is a 33rd, cannot do the same for the Ancient and Accepted Ceremony. What does that tell you? "Officially" the 3rd is the highest. Draw your own conclusions please.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
So a Grand Master, who might not be a 33° Scottish Rite Mason, can, at will, declare that Ron Seale is not a Mason.