It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I was a little annoyed that Gage kept saying that WTC 7 fell at free fall rate, when this is not the case. WTC 7 was confirmed by NIST and other independent people, to have fallen for 2.25 seconds with a free fall rate. Gage did not speficially mention this or make it clear that only part of the collapse sequence was at free fall rate.
Originally posted by impressme
Has anyone confronted Gage about his comments? Have you had a chance to write Gage to find out why he did not substantiate the NIST 2.25 seconds free fall rate? I would like to know what he would say.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
As far as the video goes, I wasn't there so I don't know what context it was used. I also don't know if he saved the video and used it or he actually went to that NIST website and used it during the presentation.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
If I were you, I would email Gage and tell him your feelings and ask him why he used that video and see what his response is.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
As a member and sustaining member of AE911T, I find your thread very offensive.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
To insinuate that Gage is purposely lying and purposely being deceptive is a very serious accusation towards the most prominent organization in the 9/11 truth movement. And even more-so since you haven't even tried to get a response from Gage about your thoughts first before making such accusations.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
As a member and sustaining member of AE911T,
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Just for the record, Gage isn't the only one that works on his powerpoint presentation material. Other people also help with that facet as well. So we really have no idea who put that particular video in his presentation and why.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
That's why contacting him to bring this information to his attention and get a response would be the better thing to do before just all-out calling people liars and accusing them of being purposely deceptive when it might have just been a mistake or an accident or something that was overlooked.
Originally posted by tezzajw
The lecture theatre looked like it could hold 250 people and it was mostly full, at least 200 people were there. Gage initially asked how many people believed the official government story. There were about three (brave) people put up their hands,
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Nothing "brave" about them. I'd call them gullible, naive and lazy for relying on the MSM for (mis)information instead of doing their own research.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Most of the people the other night were already informed about 9/11 to some degree.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
I can't tell if you're sympathetic or antagonistic to the 9/11 truth movement.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
The complaints you have about Gage's presentation seem kinda petty and nitpicky (especially compared to the massive U.S. government lies),
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
yet you claim to have donated to AE911truth.