It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by GoodOlDave
All right, here's one that comes to mind-
Q: Why on EARTH would anyone ever stage some insanely complex faked terrorist attack just so they could invade some worthless toilet of a country like Afghanistan?
A: You're seeing gov't conspiracies behind the 9/11 attack becuase you want to see gov't conspiracies behind the 9/11 attack, and you don't particularly care how absurd they sound.
posted by samhouston1886
Are you serious?
I can’t understand why some people are really so blind as to the fact that our leaders do not view us a humans but rather cattle.
A rancher cares about his cattle but when its time to kill them he does so without remorse.
Our leaders care even less than the rancher.
I find it personally insulting that people like you come here and say that we are absurd when thousands of hours or research would show that a layman whose knowledge of 9/11 is exclusively from television debunking 9/11 truth, is what’s really absurd.
I have more respect for people who know enough to stay out because they know that they are not informed, people like you really just make me sick because you come here to parrot what you saw on TV.
I am dying and people like you will send me to my grave never knowing what happened and why my children will go on with out a Father.
You are a disgusting human being.
posted by debunky
There is only one Question:
Q: Why did they US Saudis as Patsies, when they wanted to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, and why didn't they plant WMDs in Iraq?
... I think goodoldave is waiting for an answer on that one too.
Real A: Well larry silverstein put a massive insurance policy on the world trade center the month before 9-11 specifically regarding terrorism. Did he know something was going to happen? Larry got his cash, the government got their war. Patriot act passed. We lost our freedom.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
,it is estimated that he has less than a billion dollars left of the insurance payout....and he is still paying the "rent" on a property that is producing him NO income and will not be producing any income for several more years.
Originally posted by dalepmay
reply to post by The_Zomar
I could be misinformed, but didn't the 19 hijackers live in the U.S.? And attend our schools/universities? I wasn't aware that we had school students here in the U.S. living in caves.
searches through which law enforcement officers search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s permission or knowledge; the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the FBI to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order; and the expanded access of law enforcement agencies to business records, including library and financial records. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional
The act also expands the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the USA PATRIOT Act’s expanded law enforcement powers can be applied.
In a resolution passed on June 29, 2005 they stated that "Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act allows the government to secretly request and obtain library records for large numbers of individuals without any reason to believe they are involved in illegal activity
www.humanrightsfirst.org...
Human Rights First is concerned about a particular problem raised by the Inspector General in the report which the Department of Justice has not addressed. It involves the continued reliance on the so-called “custody procedure” regulations which permit detention of any alien – regardless of whether they have been designated as a “suspected terrorist” – without charge beyond 48 hours for a “reasonable period” in the event of “emergency” or other “extraordinary circumstances.”
The post-9/11 period has seen a dramatic expansion of government surveillance. Law enforcement has received extensive funding for this purpose. With little regulation and poor understanding of constitutional protections, the authorities have overstepped their bounds, especially in monitoring political activity. Many groups and individuals have found out that they have been spied upon; these include peace activists, demonstrators at anti-war rallies, animal-rights groups, student organizations, critics of U.S. policy toward Cuba, and opponents of the World Trade Organization.
Government agencies and their private contractors have covertly received private customer data from airlines, telephone carriers, credit card firms, and Internet service providers. Congress has begun investigating potential abuses and threats to civil liberties.
Unlike other losses from September 11, this loss did not happen all at once on a clear fall morning. A photograph or video camera cannot convey the damage. These changes have taken place slowly and incrementally, beneath the surface. What’s needed is an x-ray – a way to show how the very bones of U.S. law, policy and practice have shifted.
]
U.S. anti-terrorism policies not only contradict principles woven into the country’s political and legal structure, they also contradict international human rights principles...
Justice cannot exist without respect for human rights.
a federal court found that John Ashcroft, then-attorney general, violated the rights of U.S. citizens by ordering arrests on material witness warrants when the government lacked probable cause.
The judges — all appointed by Republican presidents — found that Ashcroft could be sued for prosecutorial abuses.
As the months unfolded after 9/11, we saw Congress passing dictatorial legislation, giving the President the kind of powers that Stalin and Hitler wielded.
"U.S. citizens suspected of terror ties might be detained indefinitely and barred from access to civilian courts under legislation proposed by the Bush administration, say legal experts reviewing an early version of the bill."
Originally posted by Roid_Rage27
Hmm...I think he's got you there Dave.
The military and NATO have been protecting us for DECADES. This "plot" was a cakewalk to stop, but it wasn't. Hell when a Cessna goes off course they send up a couple of F-16's.
Come on, the way the buildings fell is an great indication that they had some kind of explosives. Don't be lame and try debate that. Only explosives can create the fine dust that littered NY that day and ravaged people's respiratory system. Don't even get me started on the collapses onto themselves. That's just rudimentary physics. I think everyone understands the path of least resistance concept.
Originally posted by samhouston1886
I find it personally insulting that people like you come here and say that we are absurd when thousands of hours or research would show that a layman whose knowledge of 9/11 is exclusively from television debunking 9/11 truth, is what’s really absurd.
I have more respect for people who know enough to stay out because they know that they are not informed, people like you really just make me sick because you come here to parrot what you saw on TV.
I am dying and people like you will send me to my grave never knowing what happened and why my children will go on with out a Father.
You are a disgusting human being.
Originally posted by The_Zomar
Plane recorded to be flying in and out of USA:
CIA plane crashes with over 3 tons of coke
But you know, those who believe the official story won't comment on facts so my post was probably worthless.
Originally posted by dodadoom
reply to post by jprophet420
If I may.
Only ones that are blatantly unconstitutional!
searches through which law enforcement officers search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s permission or knowledge; the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the FBI to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order; and the expanded access of law enforcement agencies to business records, including library and financial records. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional
Um, gee, how about the right to be secure in our own homes!
I guess it wont much matter when we're dead from the flu anyway.
We must like it dry with no lube.
en.wikipedia.org...
Ah, the real reason:
The act also expands the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the USA PATRIOT Act’s expanded law enforcement powers can be applied.
In a resolution passed on June 29, 2005 they stated that "Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act allows the government to secretly request and obtain library records for large numbers of individuals without any reason to believe they are involved in illegal activity
How very convenient!
www.humanrightsfirst.org...
Human Rights First is concerned about a particular problem raised by the Inspector General in the report which the Department of Justice has not addressed. It involves the continued reliance on the so-called “custody procedure” regulations which permit detention of any alien – regardless of whether they have been designated as a “suspected terrorist” – without charge beyond 48 hours for a “reasonable period” in the event of “emergency” or other “extraordinary circumstances.”
Even though it is in direct violation of the Geneva convention!
Do I need to go into the torture thing too?
The post-9/11 period has seen a dramatic expansion of government surveillance. Law enforcement has received extensive funding for this purpose. With little regulation and poor understanding of constitutional protections, the authorities have overstepped their bounds, especially in monitoring political activity. Many groups and individuals have found out that they have been spied upon; these include peace activists, demonstrators at anti-war rallies, animal-rights groups, student organizations, critics of U.S. policy toward Cuba, and opponents of the World Trade Organization.
Government agencies and their private contractors have covertly received private customer data from airlines, telephone carriers, credit card firms, and Internet service providers. Congress has begun investigating potential abuses and threats to civil liberties.
Oh, looky here, it says Congress is investigating these abuses!
Were saved!
www.trackedinamerica.org...
The Top 40 Reasons To Doubt The Official Story Of September 11th, 2001
www.911truth.org...
Unlike other losses from September 11, this loss did not happen all at once on a clear fall morning. A photograph or video camera cannot convey the damage. These changes have taken place slowly and incrementally, beneath the surface. What’s needed is an x-ray – a way to show how the very bones of U.S. law, policy and practice have shifted.
www.humanrightsfirst.org...
]
U.S. anti-terrorism policies not only contradict principles woven into the country’s political and legal structure, they also contradict international human rights principles...
Justice cannot exist without respect for human rights.
www.globalissues.org...
www.youtube.com...
a federal court found that John Ashcroft, then-attorney general, violated the rights of U.S. citizens by ordering arrests on material witness warrants when the government lacked probable cause.
The judges — all appointed by Republican presidents — found that Ashcroft could be sued for prosecutorial abuses.
latimesblogs.latimes.com...
www.ca9.uscourts.gov...
As the months unfolded after 9/11, we saw Congress passing dictatorial legislation, giving the President the kind of powers that Stalin and Hitler wielded.
"U.S. citizens suspected of terror ties might be detained indefinitely and barred from access to civilian courts under legislation proposed by the Bush administration, say legal experts reviewing an early version of the bill."
cuttingedge.org...
I could go on and on but I'm thirsty.....
and the apathy is appallingly dry in amerika.
[edit on 8-11-2009 by dodadoom]
Originally posted by The_Zomar
You don't even know your own story you believe. Pathetic.
Originally posted by The_Zomar
Q: "How could something of such magnitude be kept so secret? Someone would SURELY leak information!"
A: Easily. The hydrogen bomb was conceived in complete secrecy at Las Alamos. Research the Manhattan project. It took over a thousand people and it never leaked.