It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by carewemust
reply to post by Mak Manto
If an average of 2,392,000 die each year in the USA and 45,000 of them
don't have health care (health insurance?), what is the point you're trying
to make? (See: wiki.answers.com... )
Personally, I don't see the need for a Government Health Insurance plan
to "keep the insurance companies honest" as Prez Obama likes to say.
Is he assuming that they are honest and he wants to keep it that way?
That's what it sounds like. If so, there are many ways to keep them
honest via regulations. Regulations work for our banking, food, and
other important industries. It sure would be cheaper to impose and
enforce regulations on health insurance companies than it would be
to set up a huge new government department. That's a no-brainer.
-cwm
[edit on 7-10-2009 by carewemust]
It's obvious that you do not understand the "pre-existing exclusion." My ex had cancer in 1985. Given a 5% survival. Med-mal caused a misdiagnosis and it had progressed unchecked. She HAD insurance and it didn't prevent the misdiagnosis.
She recovered, luckily. She has moved and had 3 employers since then. She has obtained insurance each time, no problem. Every policy had a "p-e-c exclusion." She's had 3 recurrences. All covered. All by different insurers.
How? Simple. The pre-existing condition exclusion applies to conditions you suffer from or have been treated for in the past 2 years. If you FAIL TO DISCLOSE such care or condition, your policy may be canceled for YOUR "MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION." You lie, you lose.
Tell the truth, you have to wait a year or so and it "kicks in" for the old stuff. Everything else is covered from DAY ONE.
This keeps thieves and liars from skating by without care or insurance, who then get sick, fill out an application, lie, and hope some "big corpoiration" will pay for their own stupidity. If you're honest, the pre-existing condition doesn't hurt you.
Thus, your premise is false and your argument a "red herring."
Since when can you predict what will happen to non-existent hypothetical people under plans that do not exist yet?
Let's return to reality: No insurance carrier I know, have been insured by, fought for, or fought against, ever asked an applicant for financial background information.
This is an outright lie.
"Low income families" qualify for GOVERNMENT-subsidized health care (the BEST kind, right?) in every state. Children of such families get even more GOVERNMENT-subsidized programs from birth!
Aren't you contending that GOVERNMENT programs ARE the best? Then, "low income families" get it, don't they?
The Constitution of the United States prohibits discrimination due to status or origin. PERSONS have Rights under the Constitution, not CITIZENS.
ALL government programs, State and Federal, can not legally deny care to ANY PERSON by reason of their ethnicity, status or origin.
You might want to talk to someone who passed high school government about this.
And, they're THE BEST programs, right? Outright lie no. 3.
(By the way, this makes all the Democrats who say "the government option will not cover aliens" liars, too, doesn't it?)
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by carewemust
No. You've missed the point. Each policy contained a "pre-existing condition" exclusion such as was described of by the poster.
She was covered because she was honest in her application and asymptomatic for extended periods between occurrences.
Group coverage is LESS expensive than individual. It's just a matter of spreading the risk.
I've negotiated and purchased both.
jw
Okay, I'm going to just say what a lot of people have PM'd me....
You are suspected of being an agent of DISINFORMATION, attempting to further the agenda of the health insurance lobby.
Is this true?
Let me give you a story...
This was given to Obama, and you probably know of it about the Texan woman who had breast cancer. Now, she had insurance, and was going to get a double mastectomy.
Why did she lose her insurance? Because of acne she had in the past and her weight being wrong...
Do you understand where that pre-existing clause is at? It's insane, and it's used by insurance companies to weed out thousands of people...
But, should someone be thrown off their insurance when they need it if they fail to report a case of acne that they had? Or how about a case of gall stones that they forgot about?
Foolish...
Originally posted by dizzie56
Im not exactly sure what your saying here. Are you saying that you had a procedure done to your daughter and two nurses were in attendance and you got billed for it? If that is the case, how is it the insurance companies fault? If that is the case, you need to take that up with the doc and or hospital and find out what their policy is on such matters.
Dr. John Muney is negotiating with state insurance regulators to maintain the system he arranged with patients who pay $79 a month for unlimited office visits
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by dizzie56
Im not exactly sure what your saying here. Are you saying that you had a procedure done to your daughter and two nurses were in attendance and you got billed for it? If that is the case, how is it the insurance companies fault? If that is the case, you need to take that up with the doc and or hospital and find out what their policy is on such matters.
That's the thing. It's nobody's fault -- it's a retarded system as a whole.
I understand that the insurance company enters into contracts with providers and vice versa. Hospitals may choose providers they want. The net result is that though I am supposedly "covered", in many cases I'm not! Not sure if the hospital needs to tell me whether this particular nurse who gives me an IV is participating in the plan -- but this just demonstrates sheer insanity of the existing system. Which is super-expensive to the boot, not in the least because it's inefficient because of all that incredible bureaucracy.
Dr. John Muney is negotiating with state insurance regulators to maintain the system he arranged with patients who pay $79 a month for unlimited office visits
Originally posted by jdub297
I thinklarge providers, insurance and government have a place in healthcare, but only as backstops for catastrophic illness and accidents that would overwhelm average people.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by jdub297
I thinklarge providers, insurance and government have a place in healthcare, but only as backstops for catastrophic illness and accidents that would overwhelm average people.
Define catastrophic! A condition that is not life-threatening has all the potential to send my family into bankruptcy. Can you imagine the bureaucracy that will decide who's catastrophic and who's not?
Not only is the Department of Justice Blog Squad going to reach out to nontraditional media like TPM Muckraker or the Muffled Oar, but they are also tasked with fostering anonymous comments at conservative leaning blogs such as the Free Republic. They are also tasked with fostering anonymous comments, or comments under pseudonyms, at newspaper websites with stories critical of the Department of Justice, Holder and President Obama.
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by uaocteaou
You have an excellent ability to copy and paste unsupported propaganda, now that your cover has been blown, don't you?
Try citing the sources fgor your "study" and "report" conclusions.
Every single point has been proven wrong before.
Show me your your support.
You won't because you are a disinformation agent:
“Anonymous DOJ Blogger Campaign Attacks Media and Critics”
Friday, October 2, 2009 “Anonymous DOJ Blogger Campaign Attacks Media and Critics”
muffledoar.blogspot.com...
Not only is the Department of Justice Blog Squad going to reach out to nontraditional media like TPM Muckraker or the Muffled Oar, but they are also tasked with fostering anonymous comments at conservative leaning blogs such as the Free Republic. They are also tasked with fostering anonymous comments, or comments under pseudonyms, at newspaper websites with stories critical of the Department of Justice, Holder and President Obama.
Try and support any of your claims. I know you can't.
Deny ignorance.
jw
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by dizzie56
Im not exactly sure what your saying here. Are you saying that you had a procedure done to your daughter and two nurses were in attendance and you got billed for it? If that is the case, how is it the insurance companies fault? If that is the case, you need to take that up with the doc and or hospital and find out what their policy is on such matters.
That's the thing. It's nobody's fault -- it's a retarded system as a whole.
I understand that the insurance company enters into contracts with providers and vice versa. Hospitals may choose providers they want. The net result is that though I am supposedly "covered", in many cases I'm not! Not sure if the hospital needs to tell me whether this particular nurse who gives me an IV is participating in the plan -- but this just demonstrates sheer insanity of the existing system. Which is super-expensive to the boot, not in the least because it's inefficient because of all that incredible bureaucracy.