It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They are not being supernatural in my opinion. they are using models. like if you look at www.nlp.com you will learn about some unique shi#. unbelievably cool stuff. the phrases trust your heart and listen to your feelings are about using what is called a sensory predicate.
The mind is a fantastic invention, but some would argue that it is not man's "greatest weapon."
One can theorize a level of knowledge above rational thought. When someone alludes to "instinct" or "heart" that may be what they are trying to do. In the materials I have studied it is called "knowingness." It is senior to, and more powerful than, rational thought.
It may be that rational thought is looked on as man's greatest weapon. But it is also his Achilles heal! For the mind can be booby-trapped so that it will perceive things that are not real or are not true.
I would not belittle the attempts of people to tap into higher states of knowing.
It's all about soul evolution. Using the energy centers
The soul resides in the heart. All of your guidance or instincts come from your higher self - this is felt in the heart.
If you feel light or a 'happy heart' this is the decision to follow.
Originally posted by Edrick
To their emotions?
You have heard it all before, probably...
"Listen to your Heart!"
"Let your feelings Guide you!"
(Proof Plz!)
Originally posted by Ethereal Gargoyle
(Proof Plz!)
Can you define the exact parameters of what would constitute "proof"?
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Edrick
Just because something is classified by humanity *not even all of it at that* does not mean it doesn't exist and is thusly "natural". Human classifications does not dictate reality.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Edrick
You forget that "proof" is a subjective term. What constitutes proof to one person does not necessarily constitute proof to another. If you are looking for emprical proof of things that aren't by their nature aren't a part of what we call material existance then you are attempting to find a peice of amber with a metal detector.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Edrick
But once again. It does not dictate reality. It affects our perception of reality to be sure but it simply does not dictate reality.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Edrick
I take it you are assuming "faith" is a destructive thing?
Proof:
1. any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something
2. a formal series of statements showing that if one thing is true something else necessarily follows from it
3. validation: the act of validating; finding or testing the truth of something
I can prove to you that Intellect, Creativity, and Reason are necessary for your survival.
Can you prove that "Chakras" even exist?
-Edrick