It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The idea has emerged from studies of the way children’s brains develop and of the workings of the brain during religious experiences. They suggest that during evolution groups of humans with religious tendencies began to benefit from their beliefs, perhaps because they tended to work together better and so stood a greater chance of survival.
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
I agree with the article. Human's believe in God is more complex than it seems. It's not just about poor education or indoctrination. I even believe that cavemen have some form spiritual belief.
And I disagree with the 'I figure it all out' mentality which crusading atheists and skeptics usually have. It's usually just oversimplification of things and that's not helpful at all.
www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by hautmess
The more i think about it. The more I think i'm already in heaven.
life is so beautiful.
Originally posted by KennyRJR
After awhile with a lot of spiritual experience, it comes in mind with us all that we are gods.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
An unfortunate but very real bi-product of religion at early stages of human development.
~Keeper
Originally posted by Stylez
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
An unfortunate but very real bi-product of religion at early stages of human development.
~Keeper
Seems it is even worse a bi-product of societys where Religion was NOT and that is why they didn't survive as well. They were genocided in the millions by atheistic leaders of Godless states.
Richard Dawkins counter argument is that no one was ever killed by in the name of athesim. I would just like to ask Mr, Dawkins why he thinks they would need to do it in the name of atheism if their is no religion, would their be any atheist's?
[edit on 6-9-2009 by Stylez]
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
We are born to believe in God
www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
... groups of humans with religious tendencies began to benefit from their beliefs, perhaps because they tended to work together better and so stood a greater chance of survival.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
This only proves that people of like mind and beliefs banded together for their safety/advancement.
I do agree with that article however that perhaps a belief in higher powers would have lead to better living conditions while these people were all living together.
However once another tribe with different beliefs came into the mix, I assume that violence and hatred soon followed.
An unfortunate but very real bi-product of religion at early stages of human development.
~Keeper
Originally posted by A Fortiori
reply to post by tungus
Here we go...
*eyeroll*
Because atheists never did anything wrong *cough cough Stalin cough cough*
It seems to be that the underlying commonality in violence and evil is not "religion" as the Stalins and Pol Pot's of the world have shown us, but man.
Men kill each other. Religions don't.
I would just like to ask Mr, Dawkins why he thinks they would need to do it in the name of atheism if their is no religion, would their be any atheist's?
Because atheists never did anything wrong *cough cough Stalin cough cough*
It seems to be that the underlying commonality in violence and evil is not "religion" as the Stalins and Pol Pot's of the world have shown us, but man.
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
We are born to believe in God
www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
The idea has emerged from studies of the way children’s brains develop and of the workings of the brain during religious experiences. They suggest that during evolution groups of humans with religious tendencies began to benefit from their beliefs, perhaps because they tended to work together better and so stood a greater chance of survival.