National Geographic - 9/11 Science and Conspiracy Special 8/31/09

National Geographic will be airing a new documentary surround the science and conspiracies surround 911. I'm sure all the tin-capped folks will be all over this claiming the government had this made as propaganda.

Anyway, Monday August 31st 9pm EST. This show will I assume create some heated discussions here at ATS.





More info here:

channel.nationalgeographic.com...

[edit on 20-8-2009 by CameronFox]

This looks like it is going to be rather informative:



At the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center in New Mexico, the remains a steel column in an open field after of a thermite test.:



They are also hitting on the Thermite Dust:

Conspiracy: Thermite, which is less traceable, was used in the controlled demolition that brought down the towers.
Science: Some truthers claim dust that some New Yorkers found after the attack shares the components of thermite. Scientists assert that even if this dust did contain thermite, it would be impossible to determine whether the thermite came from a controlled demolition or simply from the melting of the airplanes. EMRTC designed an experiment to see if thermite was a plausible option in the collapse of the towers. The thermite in the test was not even able to melt a column much smaller than those in the World Trade Center.

channel.nationalgeographic.com...-conspiracy-vs-science

Great find Cameron!

Surprised have not seen any ads for the show yet

Will record it and add to library of 9/11 videos

I doubt the governemnt will let NG tell the truth. But im gonna watch this just to see what ridiculous things the people say to debunk the Theories

Originally posted by guitarhero4rox
I doubt the governemnt will let NG tell the truth. But im gonna watch this just to see what ridiculous things the people say to debunk the Theories

As I predicted in my OP.

Typical.

reply to post by guitarhero4rox


They probably will not even have theories worth debunking. I would be surprised to see a reference to the publication on thermitic material being found, for example, or FEMA even finding eutectic corrosion on the steel.

Originally posted by CameronFox
This looks like it is going to be rather informative:

At the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center in New Mexico, the remains a steel column in an open field after of a thermite test.:

Oh wow, you are just going to swallow this info up without raising any questions?

Did you happen to see the youtube video of some thermite eating through
and engine block which is much more dense than that piece of steel in
your photo?

I'll be watching this 'documentary'...

Many engine blocks are made from aluminium

Would it surprise you that thermite would burn through an aluminium engine block vs a cast iron one

Do you you know what material that engine was made from ?

Or like a typical tinfolier say wow that proves it was an "side job"...

Are they testing military grades of nano-thermite, too, or just conventional thermite?

Will there be anyway to watch this on the internet.. I'm in Australia and don't have cable.. So no National Geographic for me.

reply to post by SkipStorm


Skip ~

I am quite certain it will be on YouTube the day after it airs.

Originally posted by turbofan

Oh wow, you are just going to swallow this info up without raising any questions?

Hey, hero. How could I raise any questions? The show hasn't even aired yet!

Did you happen to see the youtube video of some thermite eating through and engine block which is much more dense than that piece of steel in your photo?

Um, kind of like this mythbusters episode where a THOUSAND pounds of thermite was unable to eat through an SUV?

Originally posted by CameronFox
This looks like it is going to be rather informative:



At the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center in New Mexico, the remains a steel column in an open field after of a thermite test.:

They are also hitting on the Thermite Dust:

Conspiracy: Thermite, which is less traceable, was used in the controlled demolition that brought down the towers.
Science: Some truthers claim dust that some New Yorkers found after the attack shares the components of thermite. Scientists assert that even if this dust did contain thermite, it would be impossible to determine whether the thermite came from a controlled demolition or simply from the melting of the airplanes. EMRTC designed an experiment to see if thermite was a plausible option in the collapse of the towers. The thermite in the test was not even able to melt a column much smaller than those in the World Trade Center.

channel.nationalgeographic.com...-conspiracy-vs-science

Well, is thermite used in the demolition of buildings or not? If it is, then what is the point of this 'test'?

reply to post by CameronFox


CameronFox how come you did not post this nonsense in the Demonization of the Truther's Movement by the Lapdog News Media thread where it belonged?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/38a8487f3864.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by SPreston


Did you start that thread? Typically I stand clear of your threads Spreston. They lack substance, facts, or any pertinent information.

By the way, do you know who Joe Ferguson is? He was killed on 911 when the plane he was a passenger in struck the Pentagon. Joe Ferguson was the director of geography education outreach at the National Geographic Society. He was on flight 77 with 3 elementary children on a National Geographic sponsored field trip.

Was the God damn National Geographic controlled media in on it too? HAd elementary children killed?

posted by CameronFox
reply to post by SPreston

 

By the way, do you know who Joe Ferguson is? He was killed on 911 when the plane he was a passenger in struck the Pentagon.

Calling CameronFox. YoooHooo. No plane hit the Pentagon CameronFox, so come back down to earth, and rejoin reality. No people crashed into the Pentagon on the plane that never was. It was all a fantasy. Your precious delusion has evaporated.

Waving your hands and screaming wildly like a girl will not work.

Excellent stuff, there`s nothing like a documentary to find out all those hard to acquire answers....

1). Why was national security protocols not adhered to.
2). How did Bush see on T.V the 1st plane crash as it happened.
3). Why did he mention explosives in his live speech.
4). Why were 503 first responders and Rodriquez not asked to attend the `omission.
5). Why was WTC7 not deemed important enough to mention at the `omission.
6). The C.I.A. are trained to notice adverse movement on the stock exchange that could involve terrorism, terrorists favourite weapons are vehicles used as or carrying explosives, airports and planes yield fantastic results.....

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/20dcf329833b.jpg[/atsimg]

The Bloomberg News reported that put options on the airlines surged to the phenomenal high of 285 times their average, a huge clue here, and with the impending Norad war games approaching, it would be an absolute retard not to notice this huge in your face clue.
7). An interview with the alleged correspondent whom supplied the incorrect news report to the B.B.C.
8). This was a major crime scene, why was it not treated at as such, again a complete disregard of normal protocols.
9). Why was the rear 1 of 3 explosions from the South Tower WTC2, completely different in both flames and smoke as the other two in identical surrounds.
10). Why did John Gross and NIST say there was no evidence of molten steel, even though there were plenty.
11). Why wasn`t the emphasis of the collapses with all the evidence at hand not put down to what can clearly be seen to cause them, and more testing done as such, explosives, this does not mean it was an inside job, terrorists managed before and here they are again, why was it deemed not worthy investigating a lot more thoroughly.
12). Why if this is a war against terrorism and by all accounts very much Saudi Arabian related, has war not been declared on Saudi also, has this anything to do with John O`neil being told to back off (whole can of worms to be opened here tbh).
13). Why was war declared on Afghanistan after America could not offer evidence that Bin laden was behind it.
14). Why was everyone of importance at the respective targets not there that day ie Bush, Silverstein, are the main two but if this side had the investigation it warrants there would be alarming similarities.
15). Why has Khalid Sheik Mohammad never been brought to justice.
16). Why was President Bush allowed to continue reading to a grade school class in Florida while the nation was under attack.
17). If Al Qaeda really is this well financed, world-wide terror organization, why have there not been any single incidents of small, cheap, normal acts of sabotage and terrorism in the US, with it’s nearly open borders.
18). Why hasn`t Republican presidential candidate and Senate Armed Services Ranking Member John McCain’s wife Cindy Hensley McCain been investigated regarding her stock market activities (namely put options) just prior to 9/11.
19). In depth interviews with patriots for truth.
20). And Rodriquez.

That will do for now, this programme can do one of two things it can sidestep these issues and many more, or do it professionally and get answers, either way it`s a win-win situation for the Truthers. A seemingly avoidance of asking or completely disregarding all the anomalies will only fuel the fires more, whilst at the same time opening more eyes = profit, or the world finally gets to see the truth = huge profit.

Click here to learn more about this warning.

Originally posted by Seventh
Excellent stuff, there`s nothing like a documentary to find out all those hard to acquire answers....

I suggest you update your cut and paste job. (and do a little research while your at it)

Originally posted by CameronFox

I suggest you update your cut and paste job. (and do a little research while your at it)

Regarding?, and whenever I do a long post I nearly always write it first in a text
document, research on what exactly?.