Megyn Kelly to Obama spokesman: Will you Delete The Email Addresses?

This woman is good.

Check out the video

She reamed his arse good while he squirmed and squirmed.
She cornered him, or actually he cornered himself with a big foot in mouth, to the point where he was practically stammering and choosing his words carefully.

He almost pleaded the fifth, yet he never answered the original question.

I'm sure he went back to the White House with his tail between his legs.

Interesting video, everyone should watch this one,,,

If nothing else for the entertainment value.



And this is a white house spokesman?

Duck, Duck, Duck.

I guess we can read between the lines about the email addresses.

Simple question, yet no answer. Then they wonder why Americans are getting tired of Washington.

reply to post by Alxandro


I can't stand to 'double-speak' they do in Washington. Whatever happened to yes/no answers?

And before I get -sigh- called a racist because I disagree with the administration. . . the republicans have also done that.

There. (I should have that as a disclaimer or a signature from now on)

But this is the administration in power now. They can't stand the spotlight of the public eye on them.

Transparency my a##!

He was very transparent. He refused to answer the question "Are you purging or deleting the email addresses of those emails you are receiving?" Which only means they are not, and are made a permanent White House record that will be utilized in the future. Very transparent, for politico speak.

While I certainly see the same thing everyone else is seeing I must recall

"In politics, everything is planned, everything you see is a production."

It's worth remembering.

I hope he is a reflection of the party that came up with this nonsense... deer in the headlights....

Americans are not so stupid as not to recognize the dangerous nature of that little social experiment...

Now.... will they erase the email addresses? Or is it too late? How many IT Managers have to die before the social-engineers realize that the internet is not their plaything?

[edit on 12-8-2009 by Maxmars]

Hrmm, let's see.

"It is not my intention to run car companies" - Nationalized the Car Companies

"This is going to be the most transparent and Honest Administration in History" - Not honest and transparent

"We do not want to nationalize the banks" - Nationalized the Banks

"We do not want to give this money to the banks" - gives money to the banks

"We want honest debate" - staged town halls

"I disagree with signing statements" - Makes signing statements

"I will cut the defense budget" - Increases it by 4%

I hope you see where the is going so let's another one to the list of many that I have left off.

"We are not compiling an Enemy's List" -

Based off this guys track record, he's compiling an enemy's list.

reply to post by Hastobemoretolife


I really do hope you are wrong... but the indications are we need to be 'watchful' of this administration, but then, we really needed to be watchful of all them throughout the last century....

What needs to be different about how we control our government?

[edit on 12-8-2009 by Maxmars]

reply to post by Maxmars


I agree, we need to watch every administration like a hawk. Even if a third party was to come to power we even need to watch that one with as much vigor as we would watch any other administration.

What we need to do different is connect the dots and thoroughly vet each candidate at all levels of government, from county to state to federal. These people get there starts in the county then move to the state level then to the federal level.

Another thing is, no CEO's of huge corporations or lawyers, and no high level military personal. The best thing to do is elect people that know how the government should work and not how it actually works.

The idea of it all is to elect so many different ideologies to all levels of gov. that nothing ever gets done. Our government and the way it was set up is too efficient at the way it passes bills. That is the first sign that things are not right. In a country of 300+ million people I find it hard to believe that out of all the people that vote they can all be grouped into two ideologies for these people to keep getting re-elected.

The most import thing to do though, is to educate our neighbors and stay informed. We have to keep the internet free.

Megyn Kelly is as smart as a whip. I've seen her chew O'Reilly's *ss to bits. Since I detest how he magically "knows everything", it was a great moment.

I believe the white house intent is apparent, though they don't have the nerve to admit their deeds.

Now, IF the email addresses are kept, and IF the spokesman had admitted it, the next question would invariably be - what for?

What for?

Are dissenters now identified as terrorists?

What happens to the people deemed as such in a time of war?

Can't forget, we need to do away with the lobbyists.

No more special (selfish?) interests. But I doubt that'll ever happen.

reply to post by orderedchaos


I sent an email to this site on myself.

I'm going TDY next week, will let you all know if I suddenly got on a no-fly list.

I watched it live and it was a great moment indeed

She's good.

The American people used to watch the government, and would try, with varying terms of success, to keep it in check. But at the turn of the last century, when the progressives were voted into office, people got lazy, and began to let the government take care of them. Now, they are beginning to realize that the chickens have come home to roost. The government giveth, and the government taketh away. People about to be stripped of some of the most basic freedoms, and they are awakening to the fact that they have allowed it to come this far.
They really do believe that Obama is compiling an enemies list, that he will pull the plug on grandma(and it will come to that.)and that he really doesn't care what the citizens of this country think.
I missed Megan Kelly reaming this guy, and I'm on dialup at home. You-tubeis blocked at work.
I love to watch Megan get a hold of one of these Washingto Bureaucrats. She's like a like a pit bull. She clamps down and won't let go. Plus she's easy on the eyes.
It's a shame that all TV news is lumped into neat little timeframes. There would be some interesting confessions coming out of Washington, and elsewhere.

The compilation of the list serves a dual purpose.

First, it can be used to identify the "enemies".

Second, it can be used to identify the "friends".

When the lists fall into the "wrong" hands, who becomes an enemy/friend?
And we all know that, in time, lists have a habit of finding their way into the hands of the opposition.

What would YOU do, should you find out who submitted YOUR information for addition to the list?
The whole idea sucks big time. As if this country is not already sitting on a powder keg, this is the fuse to get each to go after another, rather than the PTB, the instigators.

She's hot for an lady older than me. But anyway i like listening to her in the morning because i go to bed when that news show goes off. It's quite balanced in my opinion.

lol;
that was a pretty good video

Hmm... I never really thought to much about the requesting of emails by the white house. But this interview brings up a good point regarding the Presidential Records Act. These emails will be on record for a long time, then they'll be made public. That scares me...

The White House says that lists aren't being made, however the ability to make those lists will be very easy with all of it being on file.

[edit on 13-8-2009 by XTexan]

reply to post by XTexan


yeah tell me about it, On my post "Letter from the whitehouse" that I posted on here....


I got a letter from em, and i DAMN sure didnt sign up to receive them, altho it says i did.....Im sure there are many different ways for this to happen, but none the less they still have my email, and used it to send me their "here let us tell you how healthcare really is" crap.....lol like im going to get my "facts" from the place trying to push the bill....sorry im not a sheep, ill go through outside sources and investigating on my own to do that!


"No no no , youll be able to keep your private healthcare, Obama says so in his speaches!" Riiiiiiiight , like how he wasnt gonna bring in lobbyist right?

I dont trust the guy, hes lied and weasled at every turn, if he cant keep the small promises he cant keep the big ones....

And when they tell you they arent gonna be using these email addresses for nefarious stuff........dont believe it for a second.......

On the other hand, there is an upside......if they want to monitor everything we do , and have all that information on us as citizens.........that means they are scared........and THAT is a good thing

I'm not seeing what you suggest.

She wants him to answer the question because the answer is "Yes". Since 1978 the white house is required to keep a record of all these correspondences.

But why does she want that answer? To imply that the records could be used against the people who they originate from.

He doesn't go for the bait and instead he addresses the concern. To that the answer is no. Had he answered yes, I'm sure they would have spun it.

Both of these people are just doing what they are told. They are soldiers in a turf war for the control of people and power. All I see is two tools arguing semantics. And they call it the news.

You will not find any facts here, just another form of entertainment. Don't be a pawn. Ignore this issue.

We have a broken system and our country is falling apart.

Viva la Revolucion!