It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Aspartame provides food, soft drinks, candy and chewing gum manufacturers with substantial cost savings compared to sugar
It is also used in vitamins and pharmaceuticals, including syrups and antibiotics for children.
In January 1976, then Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner had been charged with falsifying toxicological data on the sweetener.
Under the explicit provisions of the 1958 Delaney Law, which requires an automatic ban on carcinogenic food additives, it is anticip
the prestigious Italian Ramazzini Foundation confirmed that aspartame is unequivocally carcinogenic.
Originally posted by dizziedame
Just curious.
How much aspartame does a person have to ingest to possibly have toxic effects?
The most disturbing research on phenylalanine is found in recently published studies of its effects on the normal human brain. These studies show that elevated phenylalanine levels caused significant, widespread EEG (brain wave) slowing in neurologically normal subjects. The effects are reversible when the phenylalanine levels are lowered.
Additional research by Woodrow Monte, the director of the Food Science and Nutrition Laboratory at the Arizona State University shows that when aspartame breaks down in the body, it releases methyl alcohol (a brain toxin) into the bloodstream. Dr. Monte thinks the neurological problems reported by aspartame consumers might be caused by this toxic by-product.
It is important for the public to be aware that the safety of aspartame is controversial, (especially during pregnancy) since aspartame may soon be an ingredient in more and more processed foods. NutraSweet, a subsidiary of the Monsanto Company, has recently announced that it has perfected a process to keep aspartame from breaking down at the high temperatures required for baking. This new process could open the door to the $l5 billion-a-year sweet baked goods market.
Originally posted by Next_Heap_With
Prohibition Round 6....
i don't like prohibition..., people should choose want they want to put in their bodies...the only thing the government should do warn about the dangers..but that is all..they should not ban...
-- If you think is dangerous to you then don't drink it... there is no reason to take away other people's enjoyment..
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
the prestigious Italian Ramazzini Foundation confirmed that aspartame is unequivocally carcinogenic.
Article also mentions brain tumors, oddly enough it doesn't mention formaldehyde, I found that odd.
Can we finally see a ban on this poison?
I myself do consume it, I love my single malt with diet 7UP, it's lovely.
But I'd much prefer something better and not toxic.
www.huffingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by suicydking
Just curious...
Why ruin the flavor of a single malt with diet soda? If you have a whiskey habit, surely diet soda isn't going to help much anyway. That shot has lots more calories than a glass of 7up.
Originally posted by mahtoosacks
i seriously doubt it will get the ban. too much fn money....
Originally posted by sos37
Originally posted by dizziedame
Just curious.
How much aspartame does a person have to ingest to possibly have toxic effects?
That, sir, is the key question. Does it take 1000% the normal ingestion rate of a single day's worth of aspartame to produce "toxic" intake, the same way they test on lab mice? Or have they conducted tests with say regular groups of people drinking say three diet sodas per day for years? I doubt it.
You can't rush research by injecting something with a hundred or a thousand times the average intake of something to simulate the "over time" rate of ingestion and expect the result to be the same.