It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
His description of the S4 facility exactly matches those of Bob Lazar and "Victor", an interesting coincidence to say the least...
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
As much of a coincidence as reading a book, watching TV and repeating it back.
Why do we trust these people?
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
As much of a coincidence as reading a book, watching TV and repeating it back.
Sure but there is not much information available about S4 in books and on TV. To this day the site is unacknowledged by the government of the US.
If this "Connor O'Ryan" testimony truly was withheld from the public how do you explain the similarities between multiple witness testimonies?
Bottom line S4 appears to be a real government site. What goes on there is anybodies guess but after multiple whistleblowers came out with the same story it get's my interest.
Why do we trust these people?
I don't necessarily but I like to keep an open mind on what they have to say. Do you trust what the government has to say about S4, which is that it doesn't exist?
[edit on 4/7/09 by Fastwalker81]
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
If this "Connor O'Ryan" testimony truly was withheld from the public how do you explain the similarities between multiple witness testimonies?
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
His description of the S4 facility exactly matches those of Bob Lazar and "Victor", an interesting coincidence to say the least...
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
Do you trust what the government has to say about S4, which is that it doesn't exist?
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
If this "Connor O'Ryan" testimony truly was withheld from the public how do you explain the similarities between multiple witness testimonies?
You said it yourself...
You are presenting a false dichotomy. It is not an either/or situation.
Considering the disinformation that has been produced, why should we trust him simply because he is saying something we want to hear?
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Fastwalker81
If this "Connor O'Ryan" testimony truly was withheld from the public how do you explain the similarities between multiple witness testimonies?
You said it yourself...
Well I for one have not heard about this guy before the vid was released a few days ago. And besides the vid I could not find any reference about him from before that time. Wendelle Stevens claimed he withheld the testimony because he feared it was disinfo to discredit him. So if you can find a reference about this guy from lets say the nineties I would love to see it.
You are presenting a false dichotomy. It is not an either/or situation.
I am not sure I'm following you here. Why was my question a false dichotomy? S4 is either a base located at Papoose lake or its not, no?
Considering the disinformation that has been produced, why should we trust him simply because he is saying something we want to hear?
First of all he is not saying what I want to hear. Furthermore the people that have come forward regarding S4 and what happens there all presented some form of evidence. That's atleast alot more then the US Government has shown so far.
All I'm saying is that in my opinion these corroborating testimonies should not be dismissed out of hand just because what they present is well, incredible.