It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OhZone
The feet on the film where she was apparently walking thru snow, are very, very white. Snow sticking to the bottoms?
The Patterson-Gimlin film (also referred to as simply the Patterson film) is a short motion picture of an unidentified subject filmed on October 20, 1967
Originally posted by OhZone
I suddenly saw the face. I did then vanish from the forum.
Just look at the pic of it above.
There are none so blind as those who willl not see.
Explain to me that light area.
No one will do that.
Why?
Originally posted by Xeven
The USAF has the ability to settle this once and for all. They have many aircraft with nigh sensors that no animal could hide from. They should attempt to locate one and use special forces to capture it. It would make very realistic training.
originally posted by: iamcamouflage
reply to post by Gemwolf
My problem with the Patterson footage, that makes me question its authenticity is that this footage was taken 1967 by men who said they were going out to look for bigfoot. These guys say, "hey, lets go look for bigfoot" and bang, they get the footage they wanted.
originally posted by: OhZone
If you will measure the arm you will see that upper an lower arms are the same length. And the fingers only come to the mid thigh.
The feet on the film where she was apparently walking thru snow, are very, very white. Snow sticking to the bottoms?
The face, I'm waiting for you to describe the face. What do you see there?
originally posted by: Kandinsky
This footage takes me back to being a kid and watching it with my brother in awe. For this reason, I'd be pleased if it was confirmed as authentic footage of a Bigfoot. It's unfortunate that hoaxers have taken away the joy and wonder and replaced them with automatic doubts and jaded cynicism
Whatever the truth of the video, nobody has ever definitively nailed it as real or hoax. If we're now talking about 7' 4", it lends itself to the 'real' side of things purely because a 7'4" gorilla costume would stay on the clothes rack for a long time. Then again, it could be made specially for the video? Round and round we go again....