It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Every single change in technology in the past 50 years has had "Stop building carriers!" written all over it. But the Navy paid no attention.
I've been saying for a long time that aircraft carriers are just history's most expensive floating targets and that they were doomed.
But now I can tell you exactly how they're going to die. I've just read one of the most shocking stories in years. It comes from the U.S. Naval Institute, not exactly an alarmist or anti-Navy source. And what it says is that the U.S. carrier group is scrap metal.
Originally posted by StellarX
While i don't think aircraft carriers have much use in a world war three scenario ( they were in my opinion built for what they were used; intimidating and terrorizing the third world)
Stellar
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
Originally posted by StellarX
While i don't think aircraft carriers have much use in a world war three scenario ( they were in my opinion built for what they were used; intimidating and terrorizing the third world)
Stellar
So was the Empire of Japan a Third World Nation? Carriers are built to project Air power in locales where USAF bases remain out of reach by-in-large.
Originally posted by dingyibvs
Of course the USN won't just sail into harm's way, but that also means they won't be able to sail within 2000km of Chinese shores should a conflict between China and the U.S. breaks out.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Originally posted by dingyibvs
Of course the USN won't just sail into harm's way, but that also means they won't be able to sail within 2000km of Chinese shores should a conflict between China and the U.S. breaks out.
Why, because of an untested missile that no one even knows will work or even exists?
Originally posted by dingyibvs
I'm sure they have better intelligence than we do.
Originally posted by punkinworks09
So what kind of terminal guidance does said missle have anyway.
Ballsitic missles are just that BALLISTIC, their motion is goverend by the laws of physics.
So how does it aquire its target once its in the area?
One of the other threads indicates that it WILL use chinas version of GPS, once it is fully deployed. How will they know where the carrier is?
Or was since it will still take 10 min to get there after launch.
Sattelites?
Do people honestly think that we are going to let the chinese do what they want should there be hostilities.
As soon as hostilities are inevatible every piece of chinese harware in space will be neutralized, and we dont even have to go into space to do it.
Besides if china goes to war with the US you WILL SEE THE 2ND PEOPLES REVOLUTION.
The chinese people have gotten used to their newfound lives of relative luxury, luxury compared to life in the old communist state.
How long would the government last when it loses that which makes it powerful, trade with the west.
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
So was the Empire of Japan a Third World Nation?
Carriers are built to project Air power in locales where USAF bases remain out of reach by-in-large.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by dingyibvs
A carrier IS hard to find, when you are searching millions of square miles of ocean. A long wave radar may pick it up, but not well enough to target, or to pinpoint it. A carrier battlegroup under EMCON is a hole in the ocean. They've snuck them around undetected for quite awhile during RIMPAC before, and they can do it again under real world conditions.
Again, how does an UNTESTED MISSILE become such a deterrent that they won't park a carrier within 2000 km of China? That's like saying that ballistic missiles are useless now because we have the ABL. It hasn't actually fired the laser from the plane yet, but since it's there ballistic missiles are useless.