At the time this was going on, Iran was still very much in the cross-hairs. Even now, there's still a huge US Navy presence in the Gulf. I think
another unprovoked war might well provoke a serious reaction here, not just from Muslims, but also from ordinary citizens who've had enough of this
nonsense.
There's also a real possibility that things could go seriously t***-up economically, which could result in civil disorder.
Whichever... I don't necessarily agree with Icke on, for example, the reptilian thing or the bloodlines business, but he does good research and his
analysis about the "agenda" being pursued by both sides of the political spectrum is, I think, spot on.
In case you haven't seen all three hours of the video, he says that the "agenda" is the policies that both sides implement, that they keep coming
back to, for example the European Constitution. Originally the EEC was just supposed to be a free trade area, removing tariffs to promote the
transfer of goods within the first 6 and then 9 countries. Icke's argument is that the endgame was always political union with legislation imposed
by fewer and fewer, and less representative, politicians.
Ireland rejected the constitution. Are they going to leave it there? No.
I also think that the "chipping" is going to be pushed more and more. I couldn't believe the story a couple of years back when some deluded family
in the US actually agreed to be chipped. Eurghhh.
There's a rather good interview Aaron Russo gave to Alex Jones before his (Russo's, obviously) death in which he describes how David Rockefeller was
saying that the object is to get everybody chipped so that if anyone gives any trouble, you just "turn off" the chip. No more money... and that's
the
least of the possibilities. There's always the chance that the chip might have some sort of lethal technology embedded for real
emergencies.
I guess the ultimate paranoid nightmare is that the people who put up
the Georgia
Guidestones get hold of that kind of technology.