It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FOUR out of ten people are unaware that eating a poor diet increases their risk of cancer, a survey reveals.
The poll of almost 2,000 people found that 41 per cent were unaware of the link between what they ate and the disease.
Only about one in three people knew that eating processed meat increased their cancer risk, while 44 per cent were unaware that being overweight was another risk factor.
Originally posted by ghaleon12
I've come to the conclusion that some people really do deserve cancer due to their stupidity. After smoking for 30 years and getting lung cancer then they throw a fit. What did they expect? They don't care how badly they've been treating their body, but when they get cancer all the sudden they care. Even if they get cured, they often go back to their old unhealthy habits. One has to wonder if cancer is even bad to begin with when people make these choices. People that make those kind of choices shouldn't feel bad when they get cancer and shouldn't expect others to feel bad for them either.
Originally posted by ghaleon12
I've come to the conclusion that some people really do deserve cancer due to their stupidity. After smoking for 30 years and getting lung cancer then they throw a fit. What did they expect? They don't care how badly they've been treating their body, but when they get cancer all the sudden they care. Even if they get cured, they often go back to their old unhealthy habits. One has to wonder if cancer is even bad to begin with when people make these choices. People that make those kind of choices shouldn't feel bad when they get cancer and shouldn't expect others to feel bad for them either.
Originally posted by disfugured
What I dont understand is why does the FDA allow such things as MSG, Aspartame and certain food dye's that are toxic to the human body in many of our foods!
Many times the names are disguised through other names or codes to fool people in thinking the food they consume is safe.
That should be illegal. The same term should always be used on the back of every ingredient. Misleading people is ill.
If you understand the Warburg effect and the metabolism of cancer cells, it’s easy to see why this therapy works, even in patients who at at death’s door. Since the cancers can use only glucose, and since glucose is made in the cancer cells slowly and inefficiently, the cancer cells have to rely on outside glucose to provide nourishment for their rapid growth and replication. People on very-low-carb diets produce ketones, which take the place of glucose in other cells that can use these ketones for fuel. But cancer cells can’t use the ketones since ketones have to be burned in the mitochondria, which are dysfunctional in cancer cells. If you can keep blood sugar low, then growth of the cancer cells may be held in check long enough for the body’s own previously overwhelmed immune system to rally and beat the vulnerable cancer back.
Originally posted by BorgHoffen
Now while we are on the topic of diseases.
What about Type 2 Diabetes.
Which the CDC has labeled an epidemic.
Where did it come from?
Only 55% of people who get it, are obese.
They think, alot of heart disease and death from heart problems, in the past 20 years, may have been due to this type 2 insulin problem.
Yet they didn't even discover it.Let alone treat it.
And still don't even know what causes it to happen.
They know the process's why it happens, but not why they start.
So the plague of the 21st century will be, Type 2 Diabetes.
Originally posted by soficrow
Good work Grock.
I like your focus on individual empowerment - as opposed to blaming the victims.
In 1900, cancer was extremely rare - maybe 1 in 1 million people were infected. Now - 1 in 2 American men will get cancer in their lifetime, and 1 in 3 women.
Originally posted by DevolutionEvolvd
Now, compare those statistics with the rise in type two diabetes over the last 100 years. You'll find that those cancer statistics probably mimic diabetic statistics.
-Dev
Originally posted by Uphill
The question was raised here about whether diet could prevent the amputation of toes/feet etc. in diabetic persons. That reminds me of a story told by a physician friend of mine who worked for several years at the Pritikin Institute (founded by Nathan Pritikin). The story was about an 80-year-old diabetic woman who enrolled in the Pritikin program (which my friend describes as "eating rabbit food and exercising") with several toes that were starting to turn black from gangrene (at which point an amputation would be necessary). After 3 weeks on the Pritikin regimen, her toes returned to a normal condition. No surgery was needed.
When people report, therefore, that dietary changes did not restore their health, more information is needed.
Originally posted by soficrow
Good catch. They do indeed - as do a host of other "modern" diseases.
...And no - the rise has nothing to do with improved diagnostic abilities; infectious components are found in most every "modern" disease epidemic/pandemic, and usually some type of herpes virus is involved. Think about it - nothing spreads that fast and far without an infectious component.
But lifestyle and exposures DO contribute - so the question is "How?"
The answer has to do with the nature of latent infections - latent infections go away and lie dormant until they're triggered and reactivated, a process that can recur hundreds of times in a life, potentially spreading and infecting new cells and organs with each reactivation.
...So in terms of personal empowerment, minimizing one's exposures to potential triggers can help, as does keeping "fit." It's all about preventing latent virus reactivation, and shortening flare-ups when they do happen.
It will perhaps astound you to learn that a person who is afflicted with the main causes of cancer (which constitute the real illness) would most likely die quickly unless he actually grew cancer cells. In this work, I provide evidence to this effect.
I further claim that cancer will only occur after all other defense or healing mechanisms in the body have failed. In extreme circumstances, exposure to large amounts of cancer-producing agents (carcinogens) can bring about a collapse of the body's defenses within several weeks or months and allow for rapid and aggressive growth of a cancerous tumor. Usually, though, it takes many years, or even decades, for these so-called "malignant" tumors to form.
According to research just released by the WCRF, simple changes in diet and exercise can prevent nearly 40 percent of breast and pancreatic cancers, 36 percent of lung cancers, over 60 percent of mouth cancers, a quarter of kidney cancers and 45 percent of bowel cancers.
Remarkably, these results were achieved without any mention of vitamin D! By adding vitamin D to the mix, which by itself has been demonstrated to prevent an astonishing 77 percent of all cancers (www.naturalnews.com...), cancer prevention rates approaching 90 percent overall can be easily achieved.